 |
Page: 1 · 2 · 3
|
|
|
|
oldsouth Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Jan 5, 2003 Location: United States Posts: 174
|
|
Review Date: Apr 2, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Great picture quality for the price. Solid construction.
|
|
Cons:
|
Old technology. Not enough resolution compared to the new cameras. Poor low light focus. High ISO's have too much noise.
|
|
|
Was awesome when it first came out. Still makes great pictures compared to 90% of the cameras out there.
|
|
Apr 2, 2003
|
|
Chuck A Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Aug 16, 2002 Location: United States Posts: 15
|
|
Review Date: Apr 1, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,100.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Excellent image quality. Much better than the current crop of 3-5mp consumer cameras. Very low noise level. Good color reproduction. Great entry level DSLR. Accepts a wide array of lenses and accessories. Low price.
|
|
Cons:
|
Low light, low contrast focusing can be a problem.
|
|
|
I tried my hand at digital photography with a 4mp consumer camera and was dissapointed in the image quality and noise levels. I have moved up to the D30 and have not looked back. I bought mine used and have been very happy. With the prices dropping like stones to a level equal to or below the top of the line consumer cameras you can't go wrong.
It is only 3mp and the current crop of 6mp and above DSLR cameras show more detail. But it gives much better image quality than a 5mp consumer camera. A 9x13 print looks quite good.
It is highly adjustable and easy to use. I really can't say enough about it.
|
|
Apr 1, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
34
|
44357
|
Oct 26, 2010
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
85% of reviewers
|
$1,011.86
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
8.53
|
9.20
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
 |