|
|
dwainasaurus
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 22, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Jan 22, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $125.00
| Rating: 7
|
|
Pros:
|
Affordable, rugged, capable enough for 95% of what I do.
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow to startup, no B&W image preview option.
|
|
After spending some time with Canon's Rebel XTi, I purchased a second hand 10D for nearly free. It was put to use doing product shots. The convenient thumb wheel made it a better camera for full manual use and the smaller file sizes, compared to my 400d, were just fine for the work I was doing.
After starting my <a href="http://www.camerology.com">lens review</a> site, the 10D became a workhorse in evaluating lenses. I even did a short write up on the 10D.
Because I was already invested in the EOS line the 10D was a good fit for me. But, because of its depreciated price, the 10D is the best value of any digital body on the market. It is quite capable despite its age. I miss being able to view images in monochrome on the tiny LCD. The startup time is quite long and sometimes annoying. But for the low cost and great capabilities I'll tolerate those minor faults.
|
|
 Jan 22, 2010
|
|
AbramG
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Jan 30, 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1339
|
|
Review Date: Nov 22, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $400.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Light weight, durable, pretty solid IQ, now inexpensive.
|
|
Cons:
|
pretty slow AF, tiny tiny LCD, not too great high ISO
|
|
I'm writing a review now for a camera I owned over 4 years ago. The 10D was my first DSLR, and at the time it was the best available (the 20D wasn't out yet) I got a great deal on a used one, and it began my transition from film to digital.
I really enjoyed working with it both in and out of the studio and at the time it was so great to be able to review my images in the field. (new concept to me at the time)
These days there of course are newer and better cameras out there, but I still think the 10D was and is a great crop sensor camera. If you got a real great bargain on one it would make an excellent backup camera, or even if you are learning photography on a budget that's a great place to start! Leaves you with more money for lenses.
|
|
|
Nov 22, 2009
|
|
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Jan 14, 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 478
|
|
Review Date: Oct 23, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $150.00
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Cheap on eBay, reliable, the battery grip is great compared to the new ones.
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow, high iso pretty much unusable, the mirror fell out during an important shoot.
|
|
I bought my 10d a few years back very cheap with the grip because someone listed it as a film camera on ebay. Picture quality in low ISO was great but ISO 1600 was horrible. In the middle of a job the mirror fell out...I was able superglue it back in place and it's still holding up till this day for it's new owner.
|
|
|
Oct 23, 2009
|
|
Rjmccutchan
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 12, 2006
Location: N/A
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Jun 18, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Solid as a rock, never missed a beat, image quality
|
|
Cons:
|
slow start, slow image playback
|
|
I have had this camera a couple of years but did not use it seriously until last fall to shoot a wedding. I wish I had started with Canon instead of Konica/Minolta. I have sold all of my minolta gear and switched to all canon. (I now have a 20D also). I have been really impressed with the image quality. Tones seem to be really smooth compared to the Minolta. I have had more sharp clear pictures with this camera than I have ever had with any digital camera. Image qauality at iso800 good, and iso1600 is useable if exposed properly. I would'nt want to do serious cropping or big enlargements with iso800/1600, but it is useable for quite a few situations, and iso400 is useable in most situations. Canon's noise looks similar to film grain, so the noise never bothered me too much, especially when converting to black and white. Sometimes I would shoot at 1600 knowing I would be converting it to b/w so I could get a little gritty feel to the photograph. I have had great success with enlargements at 400. All in all, this camera is a good value at what it sells for today. It doesn't have the speed of the newer ones or the big screen on the back, but it is quite capable of excellent results. If you compare it to how we photographed weddings before digital, it's not so slow, and being able to change iso on the fly is a real plus. I've been told that people have made billboards with images taken from the 10D.
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2009
|
|
aquiles83
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Aug 29, 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 18
|
|
Review Date: Jun 4, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Accurate focus, no noise (in terms of shutter sound), weight, price
|
|
Cons:
|
Noise at 800 ISO, small dinamic range, non trustworthy light meter! (at least in my body), slow buffer, slow start up, weird problem explained above :)
|
|
This camera made me suffer a lot (because of its low speed) and gave me a lot of satisfactions:
http://tinyurl.com/qnmufo
Nevertheless I had a lot of problems while learning photography with it.
After a while I was told by an expert in digital photography that some 10d bodies tend to make different images out of the same exposure and light situations.
That means, you can take two pictures, click, click, and have two different images. Maybe one lighter than the other, or with a different white balance.
This happened to me a lot of times.
|
|
|
Jun 4, 2009
|
|
Galehn Photo
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 13, 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 36
|
|
Review Date: May 28, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $275.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Great all around camera..cant beat the price!
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
|
|
May 28, 2009
|
|
Annapurna
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Dec 29, 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Mar 27, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Build quality. Excellent imeage quality.
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow startup. Small lcd.
|
|
I have had the camera since it was released.
It took me a long time to discovers all its abilities.
Not always satisfied with the quality of the images. Sometimes it needs at lot of postprocessing.
|
|
|
Mar 27, 2009
|
|
mdwhaley
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 17, 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Feb 8, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,500.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Durable build quality, quiet shutter, image quality.
|
|
Cons:
|
.crw raw files, slow write speeds, ETTL I, noisy at ISO 3200
|
|
I have had the 10d since 2003. I also have used a 20d and a 5d. Since there is an abundance of 10d's on ebay at around 200-225 I will discuss the reasons why to buy this camera at that price compared to current technology.
This camera produces great 6 megapixel images in jpeg or raw if you know what you are doing. The build quality is solid and I still prefer the sound of the shutter compared to the newer Canon bodies.
At the current used price the only reason I would not recommend the 10d is if it will be used for ettl flash photography regularly. I mastered the different "hacks" of ettl to get the desired results like FEC and using focus lock with the AE lock button and though a pain in the butt it is possible. Newer bodies with ettl2 make all of that go away though.
Other than the flash issues at the price of a film body it is a no brainer, get the 10d.
|
|
|
Feb 8, 2009
|
|
Fusion08
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 15
|
|
Review Date: Oct 2, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Great quality with good glass, cheap (many excellent low frames on ebay) Sturdy and well built much better than 350 or even the 20D. Nice colours.
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow start-up, and review and slow transfer buffer. But not really a problem considering the end results.
|
|
Been using the 10D as a main camera up unitl I go my EOS 1Ds. Still use it regularly and although it does not match up to the quality of the 1Ds its not so far behind.
I have found it to be reliable (never missed a frame) , the exposure system is great and apart from the negatives already identified its a great little workhorse ( I have taken over 40,000 frame with it without any problems)
I will be keeping this camera as my backup and have no intention of replacing it with anything other than a 1D. Will even consider picking up another used one or two.
Would recommend to anyone as a cheap way to get pro results at a economic price.
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2008
|
|
anthonygh
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 8, 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 416
|
|
Review Date: Jul 24, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Use it with care and technique ane prepare to be amazed....
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow write speeds.......
|
|
This model is cheap as chips on eBay at the moment...but it is still an amazing camera and a real bargain. I have had mine (bought with battery grip) for two years. It's never missed a beat despite day long studio sessions. I use quality lenses and the results are ( to judge by the clients reactions) stunning!
I did a shoot recently with another photographer using a 5D. It was hard, in the end, to tell what images came from what camera...but I did have the better glass!
The build quality is beyond question...I am the proud owner of the EOS 1v ( with battery grip). For feel and handling...they are in the same league (obviously the 1v is much better for weather sealing etc...but handling wise they are similar).
I have thought about getting the 40D.....but decided the ideal studio setup (on my budget (I don't believe in throwing money at photography)) is two 10Ds with complimentary lenses...so I can just switch from one camera to the other. Sorts out the slow write speeds as well.
I already own a mint 10D.....but if not I could buy two (with grips) for the price of a body only 40D...in my mind it's a no brainer!!
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2008
|
|
Duncan Gibson
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Aug 24, 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 430
|
|
Review Date: Dec 14, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
First xxD EOS! Great value used.
|
|
Cons:
|
Considering its 4 years old not much. Slow start up. It doesn't take EF-s lenses.
|
|
I have recently upgraded to a 5D, but I want to commemorate 3 very happy years with my 10D.
Although the D30 and D60 are older, the 10D was the camera that made dSLR photography within reach of amateurs. I had never owned a film SLR, so I had a lot to learn. The 10D let me takes lots of frames, and with the help of auto-exposure some of even them got printed (I have found the 6 megapixel resolution is good up to about 8*12).
I won't sell my 10D, instead I will keep it around for time-lapse.
|
|
|
Dec 14, 2007
|
|
PJ Fish
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Nov 24, 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 15
|
|
Review Date: Nov 3, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Though Big and PRO Look Tank camera,Reliable,Sharp files,fast AF,strong made,almost weatherproof(tight design) VERY Very Quiet shutter(the best in Canon)precise autofocus and low noise.Loong shutter life.
|
|
Cons:
|
Too few series of series shut when firing raw,to slow start up(not a prob)otherwise very fine made.
|
|
This is a very good classic indeed among pros and serious amatéurs.
I still use this occassionaly as a back up,and even as a prime camera especially when i need a place for at quiet assignment.
I recently used it for sports!it was an icehockey game paired w a Canon 70-200 F2,8 L and a Canon 135 F2,0 it is still awesome indoors shooting low noise at 800 iso and 1600 iso = the pics and files you get with this Isos is incredible.
I like it so much so i plan NOT to sell it because Canon 10D is still up there in the class of the newcomers 20D and 30D.
I will recomanded this camera anytime ;its a pro camera for a budget price and very good.
|
|
|
Nov 3, 2007
|
|
|
