|
|
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Jan 14, 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 366
|
|
Review Date: Oct 23, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $150.00
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Cheap on eBay, reliable, the battery grip is great compared to the new ones.
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow, high iso pretty much unusable, the mirror fell out during an important shoot.
|
|
I bought my 10d a few years back very cheap with the grip because someone listed it as a film camera on ebay. Picture quality in low ISO was great but ISO 1600 was horrible. In the middle of a job the mirror fell out...I was able superglue it back in place and it's still holding up till this day for it's new owner.
|
|
 Oct 23, 2009
|
|
Rjmccutchan
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 12, 2006
Location: N/A
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Jun 18, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Solid as a rock, never missed a beat, image quality
|
|
Cons:
|
slow start, slow image playback
|
|
I have had this camera a couple of years but did not use it seriously until last fall to shoot a wedding. I wish I had started with Canon instead of Konica/Minolta. I have sold all of my minolta gear and switched to all canon. (I now have a 20D also). I have been really impressed with the image quality. Tones seem to be really smooth compared to the Minolta. I have had more sharp clear pictures with this camera than I have ever had with any digital camera. Image qauality at iso800 good, and iso1600 is useable if exposed properly. I would'nt want to do serious cropping or big enlargements with iso800/1600, but it is useable for quite a few situations, and iso400 is useable in most situations. Canon's noise looks similar to film grain, so the noise never bothered me too much, especially when converting to black and white. Sometimes I would shoot at 1600 knowing I would be converting it to b/w so I could get a little gritty feel to the photograph. I have had great success with enlargements at 400. All in all, this camera is a good value at what it sells for today. It doesn't have the speed of the newer ones or the big screen on the back, but it is quite capable of excellent results. If you compare it to how we photographed weddings before digital, it's not so slow, and being able to change iso on the fly is a real plus. I've been told that people have made billboards with images taken from the 10D.
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2009
|
|
aquiles83
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Aug 29, 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 18
|
|
Review Date: Jun 4, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Accurate focus, no noise (in terms of shutter sound), weight, price
|
|
Cons:
|
Noise at 800 ISO, small dinamic range, non trustworthy light meter! (at least in my body), slow buffer, slow start up, weird problem explained above :)
|
|
This camera made me suffer a lot (because of its low speed) and gave me a lot of satisfactions:
http://tinyurl.com/qnmufo
Nevertheless I had a lot of problems while learning photography with it.
After a while I was told by an expert in digital photography that some 10d bodies tend to make different images out of the same exposure and light situations.
That means, you can take two pictures, click, click, and have two different images. Maybe one lighter than the other, or with a different white balance.
This happened to me a lot of times.
|
|
|
Jun 4, 2009
|
|
Galehn Photo
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 13, 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 36
|
|
Review Date: May 28, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $275.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Great all around camera..cant beat the price!
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
|
|
May 28, 2009
|
|
Annapurna
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Dec 29, 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Mar 27, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Build quality. Excellent imeage quality.
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow startup. Small lcd.
|
|
I have had the camera since it was released.
It took me a long time to discovers all its abilities.
Not always satisfied with the quality of the images. Sometimes it needs at lot of postprocessing.
|
|
|
Mar 27, 2009
|
|
mdwhaley
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 17, 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Feb 8, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,500.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Durable build quality, quiet shutter, image quality.
|
|
Cons:
|
.crw raw files, slow write speeds, ETTL I, noisy at ISO 3200
|
|
I have had the 10d since 2003. I also have used a 20d and a 5d. Since there is an abundance of 10d's on ebay at around 200-225 I will discuss the reasons why to buy this camera at that price compared to current technology.
This camera produces great 6 megapixel images in jpeg or raw if you know what you are doing. The build quality is solid and I still prefer the sound of the shutter compared to the newer Canon bodies.
At the current used price the only reason I would not recommend the 10d is if it will be used for ettl flash photography regularly. I mastered the different "hacks" of ettl to get the desired results like FEC and using focus lock with the AE lock button and though a pain in the butt it is possible. Newer bodies with ettl2 make all of that go away though.
Other than the flash issues at the price of a film body it is a no brainer, get the 10d.
|
|
|
Feb 8, 2009
|
|
Fusion08
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 15
|
|
Review Date: Oct 2, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Great quality with good glass, cheap (many excellent low frames on ebay) Sturdy and well built much better than 350 or even the 20D. Nice colours.
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow start-up, and review and slow transfer buffer. But not really a problem considering the end results.
|
|
Been using the 10D as a main camera up unitl I go my EOS 1Ds. Still use it regularly and although it does not match up to the quality of the 1Ds its not so far behind.
I have found it to be reliable (never missed a frame) , the exposure system is great and apart from the negatives already identified its a great little workhorse ( I have taken over 40,000 frame with it without any problems)
I will be keeping this camera as my backup and have no intention of replacing it with anything other than a 1D. Will even consider picking up another used one or two.
Would recommend to anyone as a cheap way to get pro results at a economic price.
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2008
|
|
anthonygh
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 8, 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 357
|
|
Review Date: Jul 24, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Use it with care and technique ane prepare to be amazed....
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow write speeds.......
|
|
This model is cheap as chips on eBay at the moment...but it is still an amazing camera and a real bargain. I have had mine (bought with battery grip) for two years. It's never missed a beat despite day long studio sessions. I use quality lenses and the results are ( to judge by the clients reactions) stunning!
I did a shoot recently with another photographer using a 5D. It was hard, in the end, to tell what images came from what camera...but I did have the better glass!
The build quality is beyond question...I am the proud owner of the EOS 1v ( with battery grip). For feel and handling...they are in the same league (obviously the 1v is much better for weather sealing etc...but handling wise they are similar).
I have thought about getting the 40D.....but decided the ideal studio setup (on my budget (I don't believe in throwing money at photography)) is two 10Ds with complimentary lenses...so I can just switch from one camera to the other. Sorts out the slow write speeds as well.
I already own a mint 10D.....but if not I could buy two (with grips) for the price of a body only 40D...in my mind it's a no brainer!!
|
|
|
Jul 24, 2008
|
|
Duncan Gibson
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Aug 24, 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 430
|
|
Review Date: Dec 14, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
First xxD EOS! Great value used.
|
|
Cons:
|
Considering its 4 years old not much. Slow start up. It doesn't take EF-s lenses.
|
|
I have recently upgraded to a 5D, but I want to commemorate 3 very happy years with my 10D.
Although the D30 and D60 are older, the 10D was the camera that made dSLR photography within reach of amateurs. I had never owned a film SLR, so I had a lot to learn. The 10D let me takes lots of frames, and with the help of auto-exposure some of even them got printed (I have found the 6 megapixel resolution is good up to about 8*12).
I won't sell my 10D, instead I will keep it around for time-lapse.
|
|
|
Dec 14, 2007
|
|
PJ Fish
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Nov 24, 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 15
|
|
Review Date: Nov 3, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Though Big and PRO Look Tank camera,Reliable,Sharp files,fast AF,strong made,almost weatherproof(tight design) VERY Very Quiet shutter(the best in Canon)precise autofocus and low noise.Loong shutter life.
|
|
Cons:
|
Too few series of series shut when firing raw,to slow start up(not a prob)otherwise very fine made.
|
|
This is a very good classic indeed among pros and serious amatéurs.
I still use this occassionaly as a back up,and even as a prime camera especially when i need a place for at quiet assignment.
I recently used it for sports!it was an icehockey game paired w a Canon 70-200 F2,8 L and a Canon 135 F2,0 it is still awesome indoors shooting low noise at 800 iso and 1600 iso = the pics and files you get with this Isos is incredible.
I like it so much so i plan NOT to sell it because Canon 10D is still up there in the class of the newcomers 20D and 30D.
I will recomanded this camera anytime ;its a pro camera for a budget price and very good.
|
|
|
Nov 3, 2007
|
|
Bernd Guthmann
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Aug 29, 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Aug 29, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
durable, dead reliable, tool for nearly every situation (if you do your job right)
|
|
Cons:
|
a bit slow compared to newer designs, battery life, needs good lenses
|
|
I felt in love with this camera from the very first beginning, bought it 4 years ago and released about 25.000 times. I'm still amazed with the result when I use my brain to work with the abilities the 10D gives to my hands.
This is not a fire-and-forget camera as like as most of the semi-pro or pro cameras aren't. I t takes good lenses to create good pictures the body is only just one part of the whole system. Sio invest in accessories like an external flash (first 380EX now 580 EX), the battery grip and again in lenses.
No matter what shooting situation I'm in I can trust on my 10D as my favorite workhorse.
Sometimes I would liek to have it operate a bit faster but this is something you get used to. Be sure to carry some extra battery life with you and you'll be on the save side.
|
|
|
Aug 29, 2007
|
|
pziasd
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Dec 27, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 569
|
|
Review Date: May 26, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Pro look and feel w/battery grip, build quality, battery life, fast focus with prime or L glass, quiet shutter, easy to use controls, image quality, compatible w/550 EX and price.
|
|
Cons:
|
Buffer speed, 1.6x crop factor, start up, unable do use my 50mm indoors due to crop factor, viewfinder brightness, LCD.
|
|
I bought this 10D from a forum member and I've been very pleased with this camera, it does have its pros and cons.
Pros:
I have always loved the pro look and feel of Canon cameras,the 10D with the BG-ED3 grip has just that. The construction is sturdy and the heft lets you know its not a toy. The 10D focuses fairly fast with better glass, if you have the kit lens...loose it. The 550 EX and remote shutter release is compatible with both the 10D and EOS 3, which worked out since I have both cameras. The image quality is crisp and sharp with better glass, not so much with the kit lens. You really don't need more than 6mp unless you plan on printing your photos and most people don't, at full resolution you can get prints up to 8x10 without loss of quality or any extra PS work. The small/normal is more than adequate for Internet use. The medium/fine is great for 4x6 prints....unless you like spending more time playing with software than being outside taking photos the small to medium resolution is your best bet.
Cons:
The small sensor can limit what you do indoors. I have a 50mm f1.4 that I tried to use at a family birthday party, but I couldn't back away far enough to get everyone in the frame. The 1.6x crop factor turns 50mm into an 80mm which isn't condusive to indoor use. I recommend the 28-105 or the 24-105 L, either of these two will allow more flexiblity shooting in and out doors and these lenses are a great workaround for the 1.6x crop factor. The startup is slow but not unreasonable. The viewfinder isn't as bright as my EOS 3 but the 10D isn't a 'pro' camera.The LCD is small, however I don't use the LCD to preview my photos, its turned off. I have enough confidence in my skills that I don't need the preview.
The buffer is the bottleneck. Unless you plan on printing all of the photos you take, shoot at either the medium/fine or small/fine resolution...the write speed will be fast enough, shooting a 9 shot burst at full resolution (large/fine) will cause the camera to pause for about 12 seconds while it processes the data and writes it to the card. If you need to shoot this many images regularly, the 10D isn't for you...go for the 5D or one of the 1 series cameras.
Conclusion:
For the money you won't find a better camera and deals can be found regularly here and elsewhere. I think this is camera is a great walkaround camera and for photogs on a budget. Its much better value than the Nikon equivalent. This is really more camera than the average person really needs. With the 1GB card and the resolution set at medium/fine there's room for almost 700 images.
|
|
|
May 26, 2007
|
|
|
