 |
|
|
Keith B.
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 6, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 676
|
|
Review Date: Feb 2, 2015
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Striking, anti-blue, saturated color and high contrast even when resolution is down at the edges of the frame.
|
|
Cons:
|
Illumination falloff at the edges and corners is more than you get with a good zoom. Wave distortion, but not terrible.
|
|
|
I really like the 18mm focal length on 24x36 imagers. I've got this lens, the old Nikon 18/4, the Nikon 17-35/2.8, and the Nikon 14-24/2.8 that all cover this focal length. I plan to acquire a copy of the Nikon 18mm/3.5 Ais---which has a similar imaging style to this lens--- sometime in the future.
This lens takes a bit of practice to learn. You can get edge-to-edge sharpness, and then blurry edges on the same shoot at the same aperture.
I suspect there's a bit more convex-to-the-lens curvature of field than one could wish for.
Interestingly, this lens was close to my ancient Nikon 18mm/4 in resolution on the test charts, but the color and contrast are way higher than the old Nikon.
The Nikon 14-24 is superior in resolution and absence of illumination falloff on those same charts. However, this 18mm Distagon does not weigh one kilogram. And, the Nikon 14-24 doesn't have the Zeiss coloration which I describe as "anti-blue' rather than "warm".
This is the best 18mm prime---new or used---currently available for Nikon.
|
|
 Feb 2, 2015
|
|
rbussmann
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 11, 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Jun 25, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,295.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Size, weight, color rendition, IQ.
|
|
Cons:
|
Maybe price, but you pay for what you get.
|
|
|
This is really an underrated lens. Yes, wide open the borders are said to be less sharp than in the 21mm. On the other hand the lens is really small, and ideal for travel. And it IS wide. Right now nothing in the Canon line-up comes even close. The built is stunning - makes you get addicted to Zeiss!
|
|
|
Jun 25, 2013
|
|
victoriae
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 13, 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Mar 8, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,000.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Size, ease of use, build quality, IQ, contrast
|
|
Cons:
|
Large filter size
|
|
|
I'm in agreement with those who feel this is an underated lens. OK it's not as sharp as the 21mm from what i have seen on reviews etc. It produces superb images, a bit of CA easily corrected in Light room. Set at around f8 most things are in focus and manual focus is not a problem for me. Typical Zeiss look to the images, small light and compact. I now have the 35mm f2, 50mm MP, 85 1.4 and this 18mm f3.5. Took me a while to get into these lenses but i have to say they are all superb. Wish i could afford more?
|
|
|
Mar 8, 2013
|
|
kzaret
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 6, 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 12
|
|
|
Feb 20, 2013
|
|
Doo-bop
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jul 17, 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 167
|
|
Review Date: Dec 23, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
lightweight and small, superb build quality, sharp into the corners
|
|
Cons:
|
light fall off, cost
|
|
|
IMHO the lens is underrated on FM. I have it to complement my 24-70 on the wide end and appreciate the small size. Not using it everyday it is still in my bag and gives me good image quality when I need it.
|
|
|
Dec 23, 2011
|
|
Steve Perry
Online
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Oct 9, 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4991
|
|
Review Date: Dec 10, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,300.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, lightweight, nice rendering, takes a polarizer
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
OK, I keep seeing all the so-so reviews for this lens and just had to speak up.
I own a lot of high-end glass - including the Zeiss 21 - so it does take a lot for me to be impressed with a lens.
For my usage, this lens is excellent. I use it exclusively for landscape work and find across the frame sharpness to be exceptional - and I love the way it renders.
I'm generally shooting it on a D3x in the F8-F11 range, so maybe stopping down is the trick to using this lens (honestly, never used it wide open). All I know is when I need to go wide I don't hesitate to grab this lens. It's been a consistant producer for me.
|
|
|
Dec 10, 2011
|
|
Edgars Kalnins
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 9, 2007
Location: Latvia
Posts: 708
|
|
Review Date: Sep 5, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
resolution, colours, contrast
|
|
Cons:
|
do not see any on canon 30D
|
|
|
I have only used it on a crop sensor camera - Canon 30D. This is the 5th Zeiss ZF lens I have used (not counting Contax) and I can say it is very good. Sharpness is very good, very little postprocessing is needed. I do not need to add any contrast at all. I have not used other lenses this wide apart from canon EF-S 10-22, which while nice was not as good. I have to stress though that i can not comment on the corner sharpness due to the camera I use!
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2010
|
|
mattrosc
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 7, 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Jul 23, 2010
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 4
|
|
Pros:
|
Build quality
|
|
Cons:
|
Poor optical quality at edges of frame and at most apertures.
|
|
|
Think of any company that produces a range of superlative products eg Lexus. Now think of one outstanding product after another and then they produce a clonker. This is what Zeiss have done. This is in my view a real contradiction, because most anyone you speak to who produces quality will avoid marketing something or working to a standard that is well below their usual, and believe me this is. I found I could just about get an acceptable picture if I shot at f8 and then cropped to the equivalent of a 20mm lens coverage, and since I have the 21mm distagon....
|
|
|
Jul 23, 2010
|
|
ic2foto
Offline
Registered: Jun 19, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 3
|
|
Review Date: Jun 19, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,400.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
I am currently renting this lens and an 35mm ZE from BorrowLens.com. I have very good lenses (selected Zeiss/Contax lenses) to compare them to and am satisfied that these are the next step up in quality. While expensive, you more often than not get what you pay for and these are the best that I've yet to experience. Are they perfect - no. Are they the best you can get - very likely!
35+ years of serious work can be found at www.Image-Circle.com
Cheers
|
|
Cons:
|
Lens cap is nice looking - but problematic as others have stated. Buy a generic at your convenience give the Zeiss cap to a fellow photographer with ambition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 19, 2010
|
|
burningheart
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 20, 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2562
|
|
Review Date: Apr 15, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 7
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharpness across the middle, color, contrast, closeups, controls flare and CA extremely well
|
|
Cons:
|
Light loss at wider apertures also causes noise, uneven color in the sky, distortion, hood
|
|
|
Light loss in corners of about 1 stop in the corners upto F5.6. At F3.5 the loss adds noise to the image. There is distortion for straight lines, not really noticeable for landscapes. Hood does not allow you to easily rotate a slim polarizer. The hood mounts in multiple ways but only one way is correct. When you mount the hood look through the viewfinder to confirm it does not block out part of the scene. Watch out for unevenly lit skies in the final image.
Only use slim mount filters otherwise it will cause vignetting.
Good contrast like other Zeiss lenses, color is excellent, does excellent closeup shots. Controls flare and CA extremely well. Excellent center sharpness.
For IR shooters hotspots with RG715 starting at F8 and F5.6 with a B+W 093.
Knowing the shortcomings of this lens is half the battle. This lens can deliver some outstanding images and I like what it can producs for landscapes and extreme closeups. If you are looking for edge to edge sharpness wide open with no light loss get a 14-24. If you are into IR, get the 1st version of the Leica 19mm. If you like landscapes and Zeiss drawing, colors or extreme closeups this is the one for you. My copy is the ZF version and I use an adapter to mount it on a Canon when needed.
|
|
|
Apr 15, 2010
|
|
Lotusm50
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 26, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 6230
|
|
Review Date: Apr 2, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,240.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Excellent center sharpness, Zeiss color, contrast and pop, compact size, build quality, image characteristics consistent with rest of Zeiss ZF/ZF/ZK lenses.
|
|
Cons:
|
light falloff and corner sharpness at larger apertures.
|
|
|
Whether you like this lens or not depends on what you expect from it. It is a significant improvement over the older Zeiss 18mm f4.0 for Contax. However, it does not reach the exceptional standard reached by the ZF/ZE 21mm. It is not a wider version of the 21mm Distagon. Then again it is not designed to be. It is designed to be less expensive and more compact and therefore certain compromises were made. Like most ultra wide angles, it shows an average amount of field curvature -- not out of the ordinary for an 18mm lens, it's just not as corrected as the 21mm. It needs f5.6 or even f8 to get the extreme corners sharp -- but is fine to the edges of the frame. Light falloff could be better wide open -- probably a function of keeping the design small. It is, perhaps the smallest modern 18mm out there. It is dwarfed by the Nikon 14-24, the Zeiss/Sony 16-35 and the Zeiss/Contax 17-35 an the Canon 16-35 LII. It won't be as sharp into the corners as the Nikon 14-24, but many will find the typical Zeiss color and pop of the ZF 18mm to produce a nicer image. All in all, this is a very good lens, but not an exceptional one. It is not without flaws -- tradeoffs for price and size. If you like Zeiss lenses and their imaging characteristics in general, there is a good chance you will like this lens. One wonders if Zeiss might have been better designing a larger, more highly corrected, lens that would sell for $2000, rather than this compact tradeoff for $1240. I think there would be many that would prefer the later. Zeiss obviously thinks that this lens, as designed, will suit the needs of many other buyers -- sufficient to produce the lens. Which side of that design choice are you on? That will determine whether this lens is for you, or not.
|
|
|
Apr 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
11
|
23172
|
Feb 2, 2015
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
91% of reviewers
|
$1,247.00
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
9.82
|
8.11
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
