 |
|
|
LMT1972
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 26, 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 271
|
|
Review Date: Nov 22, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $5,500.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, lighting AF, handles TC's very well.
|
|
Cons:
|
A bit pricey in Oz. Lens foot is next to useless.
|
|
Bought this secondhand in great nick for a bargain price and couldn't be happier with my purchase.
IQ is just superb and there's really not much difference in centre sharpness between f2.8-5.6, though the corners do improve noticeably as you stop down. I use this lens with the 1.7 quite a bit and while sharpness is reduced it is still very good and easily useable wide open though I tend to use it at f5.6-6.3 (I used to own the Tamron 200-500 and the 300VR + 1.7 TC blows it out of the water @ 500mm). Oh, and the bokeh rocks on this lens as well and is great for protraits :D
AF is very quick and makes the 70-200 look slow in comparison. With the 1.7 TC it still does a stellar job (BIF's are no worries) though obviously a bit slower than the naked lens.
VR works very well and I use it a lot with the 1.7TC even at higher shutter speeds for easier framing/composition of images.
Handholding is possible but only in short bursts with VR on to steady camera shake. I use mine mostly on a tripod or monopod with a Wimberley SK and it works very well.
Also bought the Kirk lens foot for mine and is so much better than the woeful Nikon one and also provides better balance on the Wimberley SK.
I use mine on a D300 which does a good job but I still think it limits the allround capabilities of this lens, so I can only imagine how it performs on a D3s/D3x.
Conclusion - if you can afford one, get it!!! Also with the 1.7TC it becomes a very nice 500 f5
Cheers
Leigh
|
|
 Nov 22, 2009
|
|
Len Shepherd
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 15, 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 235
|
|
Review Date: Aug 19, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Adding to previous comments (it is an excellent lens) one improvement over shorter focal length VR lenses (except the 200 f2) is the VR on off switch is a huge twist grip ring near the back of the lens, easily switched on or off wearing thick gloves - a major improvement on the small recessed slider switch on most VR lenses.
In the UK it is about 7.5% cheaper than the Canon.
|
|
Cons:
|
The tripod foot is unsuitable for twin screw long plates.
|
|
Excellent lenses.
|
|
|
Aug 19, 2009
|
|
hkurkela
Online
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 10, 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 23
|
|
Review Date: Apr 25, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Very quick AF, extremely sharp, very good VR
|
|
Cons:
|
Heavy, expensive
|
|
Got mine second hand earlier this year. I'm using this lens mostly to photograph wildlife with D300 and on monopod. The VR allows to use even 1/50 hand held with good success rate. Anyway I'm mostly using 1/100 or faster and VR on.
The lens is very, very sharp and I prefer to use it mostly without a TC. Adding TC 1,7 means slight drop in sharpness, but that can be easily handled by turning the aperature (F8-F11) and/or in Lightroom.
Highly recommended!
Here's some recent wildlife photograps taken with D300 and this lens (lens and lens+TC1,7).
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/765162
|
|
|
Apr 25, 2009
|
|
D.K. Owens
Offline
Image Upload: On
Registered: May 6, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 1
|
|
Review Date: Apr 15, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Excellent build, AF-Speed is blazing. Nails every shot on the D3.
|
|
Cons:
|
None!
|
|
A workhorse lens! I use this for NBA shooting and it nails 99% of the shots. Image quality is awesome. During a NJ Nets and LA Lakers game, mounted on the D3, I captured shots from everywhere on the court. ISO values never exceeded 1600 on the camera, although set to max out at 3200.
To my surprise, this lens shines in indoor sports arenas. Color and contrast are exceptional. At the same time the aperture can go as high as f/6.3 without any loss of speed and no visible grain (noise) shooting a pro game.
http://web.me.com/evilgenius44/Site/Sports.html
|
|
|
Apr 15, 2009
|
|
trenchmonkey
Online
Image Upload: On
Registered: Oct 22, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 21706
|
|
Review Date: Oct 5, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $4,350.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, fast, gorgeous bokeh
|
|
Cons:
|
Wish I'd bought it sooner. :)
|
|
One word...Awesome. Wide open goodness, 3D on a D3. Takes the 1.4/1.7
quite well with little loss of AF speed. Consider the RRS replacement foot,
makes a great handle. Handholdable especially with BushHawk. VR is
superb, static shots at 1/60th with TC commonplace with good technique.
I come from the 300 f2.8 IS/1DmkII school of BIF...I'm blown away. The
2nd best lens I've shot since turning to the dark side. #1's the 200 f2 VR
but not by much. It's a little more than the Canon version, the 200 f2 VR was
quite a bit less. I'd never hold price over IQ and this suckers got that in spades. 
|
|
|
Oct 5, 2008
|
|
General Tso
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 30, 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 87
|
|
Review Date: May 21, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Image Quality, Sharpness at f/2.8, VR-II, programmable AF buttons and tripod autodetection
|
|
Cons:
|
Priced higher than Canon's 300mm F2.8L, weight, size.
|
|
This is THE motorsports lens to use, hands down no debate about it. The build quality is what you would expect from a $4000 lens and optics is not compromised one bit. The lens is so tack sharp even at f/2.8 and the VR-II is very helpful considering the heavy weight of this lens.
It comes with a carbon fibre hood and overall, the lens is quite hand holdable unfortunately you will most likely need a good manfrotto pan head and tripod to get the best out of this lens.
When mounted on a D300, the viewfinder is BRIGHT and you will notice how well it performs with a D300. No doubt that this lens is probably one of Nikon's finest if not the finest 300mm lens ever produced and even surpassing the Canon's F2.8L. If you don't believe the hype, take a look at some of the sample images here:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/645372
The price is the only negative about this lens considering it is priced higher than the Canon's F2.8L. Why I do not see more Nikon in the sports field makes me believe Canon still has a "brand" loyal following - perhaps more so along the lines of sports shooter getting major incentives to shoot Canon at sporting events. I have no doubt that if you are a Canon shooter, having tried out this 300mm, you will not hesistate to come over to the "N" side.
Pictures speak for themselves, so look at the link above and judge for yourself. This lens is money but just like a ferarri, when you pay that much, you expect performance and the 300mm F2.8 VR delivers it.
|
|
|
May 21, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
