 |
|
|
trenchmonkey
Online
Image Upload: On
Registered: Oct 22, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 18305
|
|
Review Date: Aug 15, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $350.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
One of the true perks of shootin' Nikon.
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
Coupled with fast primes this TC really shines. Outstanding IQ/AF speed
with my 200 f2/300 f2.8 VR's This little addition has actually saved me thousands
of dollars not having to purchase a 500...love when that happens! 
|
|
 Aug 15, 2009
|
|
svx94
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Mar 25, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 591
|
|
Review Date: Aug 10, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $370.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
No IQ lost at all
|
|
Cons:
|
not yet identified
|
|
I have used this converter on 2 lenses so far:
Nikon 80-200/2.8 AF-S;
Nikon 105/2.8 VR micro
And, I did a comparasion between the 105 + 1.7x and the 80-200 (which is considered as one of the sharpest lens from Nikon), there is no drop of image quality as I can tell.
In short, I don't have any negative to say about this one.
|
|
|
Aug 10, 2009
|
|
84FJ60
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 20, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 164
|
|
Review Date: Sep 5, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $349.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Great build & image quality
|
|
Cons:
|
pricey
|
|
Bought this teleconverter in June 2008 to use with my 300f4 AFS Nikkor. Fantastic combo. Autofocus works well with adequate daylight. Image quality is quite good.
I chose the grey market offering due to the $75 price difference.
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2008
|
|
Aqualung
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 19, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 70
|
|
Review Date: Apr 2, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharpness (if you don't open it up)....flexibility, adds good reach to my 70-200.
|
|
Cons:
|
not as sharp as the TC1.4...
|
|
I bought this last year shooting large field sports like LAX and a lens larger than my 70-200 wasn't in my budget.
I was pleased w/ the combo. Note that I took the recommendations found here: http://zaps21.com/photo/TC17tests/TC17tests.htm
very helpful and as a result I scrupulously avoid shooting it wide open.
Now that I have a 120-300f2.8, I probably won't use it too much, but I'm going to hang onto it. I do think that I might add a TC 1.4 to my stable, in the future.
|
|
|
Apr 2, 2008
|
|
cheiklefou
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 2, 2005
Location: France
Posts: 59
|
|
Review Date: Mar 18, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $420.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp en light. with a 70-200 f2.8 you have a 340mm f4.5. on my D200 it's a 510mm f4.5 !!!!! you keep a fast focus
|
|
Cons:
|
nothing
|
|
it's perfect to shoot out door, animals or sport. in concert or spectacle, it can be limited.
|
|
|
Mar 18, 2008
|
|
JoeTym
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 17, 2008
Location: China
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Mar 18, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Really sharp in combination with my Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 VR and D300.
|
|
Cons:
|
Haven't found any yet.
|
|
I'm an American living in Beijing. I have a D300 and a Nikkor 70-200mm f2.8 VR lens. I bought the Nikkor TC14E II about 6 months ago. I read a review that it was amazinly sharp in combination with the 70-200mm f2.8 VR. It was. Now having bought the TC17E II, I wish I handn't bought the TC14E II. I think I will only carry the TC17E II, so I may sell the TC14E II. Not that the TC14E isn't super sharp (it is), but I don't need both, since they are so close. Once I find out how good the TC20E II is, I may end up with the TC14 and the TC20 and sell the TC17, since I think all three is overkill.
This review is not based on a lot of shooting, but I am very happy with the TC17E II. I saw that no one else had written a review, so I thought I should try to contribute something, even though preliminary.
|
|
|
Mar 18, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
