 |
|
|
chmod
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 18, 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 16
|
|
Review Date: Apr 30, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Predictability, focus lock, vibrancy
|
|
Cons:
|
nothing which matters
|
|
After reading many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the Canon 135.
For my purposes, this is a spectacular lens. I need fast auto-focus, predictable focus lock and natural, vibrant color rendition. This lens provides all of these requirements.
Do I wish it were manufactured with metal? Sure, that would be swell...but it doesn't impact how it performs for my purposes.
I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed images. For that I would investigate alternatives, just to make sure. I do not believe one lens works perfectly for all circumstances, after all.
My work requires auto-focus. I do not use burst mode, but the lens would produce movie-like frames. In fact, it might be fun to try!
On a full frame body, I rely upon this lens and it does not disappoint.
A recent stage show using this lens exclusively...
http://www.idyll.com/laneysat
|
|
 Apr 30, 2013
|
|
rbussmann
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 11, 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Apr 23, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Fantastic lens, wonderful color rendition, tough built.
|
|
Cons:
|
A bit long for interior work in small spaces.
|
|
|
Exceptional lens if you have enough work space, great bokeh.
|
|
|
Apr 23, 2013
|
|
kyerthenomad
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Nov 29, 2012
Location: N/A
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Feb 16, 2013
|
Recommend? |
Price paid: $1,000.00
|
|
Pros:
|
who doesn't like this lens? the best L for the money, great candid lens
|
|
Cons:
|
it's not as practical a portait lens as the 85
|
|
|
Love it love it love it! (who doesn't) it works well with my 50mm 1.2 for weddings and events.
|
|
|
Feb 16, 2013
|
|
Stoffer
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 463
|
|
Review Date: Feb 8, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Extreme sharp, superb bokeh, fast AF, outstanding value
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
An outstanding gem in the Canon lens-lineup. Extreme sharp even wide open, wonderful bokeh to kill for, fast autofocus all at an great price. Great on both APS-C and full-frame. Good MFD.
I'm adding an EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II to my lens setup because I need the shorter focal range and IS when shooting indoors in low light, but it is much more heavy. The 135 F2.0L is way more stealthy when you need the for candid street shooting.
|
|
|
Feb 8, 2013
|
|
paulw
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 19, 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1
|
|
Review Date: Dec 14, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Compared to 70-200 f/2.8isII it's so light, and pin sharp at f/2 after careful AFMA
|
|
Cons:
|
I miss the IS. In some respects the f/2 advantage is diminished by this.
|
|
|
Out of curiosity I tracked the focal length used for portaits over a four week period using the 70-200 f/2.8isII. A staggeringly high percentage were in the 120-150mm range. So that quickly turned my attention to the 135 f/2. AF is very fast but doesn't seem quite up to the 70-200 f/2.8isII.
After autofocus microadjustment (AFMA) on my 1D4 and 5D3 it's settled in just fine delivering stunning files even at f/2. BTW the AFMA for both bodies needed -9.
|
|
|
Dec 14, 2012
|
|
kyerthenomad
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Nov 29, 2012
Location: N/A
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Nov 29, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,000.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Canon's best L lens for the money. Size and weight. It's a an excellent candid lens
|
|
Cons:
|
not much... perhaps it's not as practical for portraits as the 85 1.2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 29, 2012
|
|
vaflower
Online
Image Upload: On
Registered: Oct 21, 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 73
|
|
Review Date: Nov 27, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 27, 2012
|
|
sgtbueno
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 30, 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 182
|
|
Review Date: Nov 25, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Price!! Image quality, bokeh
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
This is an amazing lens, I just can't believe that is so inexpensive.
Dont worry about non IS, this lens is great, my keeper rate with this lens on my 5dm11 is above 95%, and thats amazing with any lens on the mkii.
It is sharp and prodice an amazing bokeh,you will not find anything to hate about this lens, along with the 35L, is all you need for any wedding or event.
|
|
|
Nov 25, 2012
|
|
Rob Holloway
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 28, 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Oct 28, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,050.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Color rendition
Contrast
Speed of focus
Bokeh
Balance
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
The first L lens I purchased. Every time I looked through shots from a weekend these just shined. The lens yields great blacks and my keep rate is very high.
135mm might seem like a focal length you won't use. On a FF body it's awesome for portraits without being in the subjects face.
Bokeh is wonderful!
Another important point for me is that the lens is not white and obtrusive.
I have about 13 lenses and this is always in my bag.
|
|
|
Oct 28, 2012
|
|
James Markus
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jul 19, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 3840
|
|
Review Date: Sep 21, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $850.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast, well built, superb optics, and bokeh to die for.
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
As you can tell by the average user rating (9.9) here on FM that this is an exceptional lens. This is one of the finest lenses I have ever used, and I have used many, many lenses with many formats & manufacturers. Chromatic aberration is extremely well controlled. I have not experienced ghosting or lens flare at all...coma distortion is non-existent. A truly magic lens! Get it!
Sample:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/hosting-data//500/76816SomeMorePlease_135mm_Sample-Web.jpg
|
|
|
Sep 21, 2012
|
|
n210s
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: May 6, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 151
|
|
Review Date: Aug 4, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $800.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, fast, lightweight and super nice bokeh.
|
|
Cons:
|
only if we can get IS for the same price
|
|
|
This is the third time I own this lens and will stay full time on my 1dmkII/5dc this time. Very sharp, very fast focus, light weight(compare to 70-200II) and great bokeh and did I say very sharp at f2
|
|
|
Aug 4, 2012
|
|
Ulan
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 14, 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 97
|
|
Review Date: Jun 13, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Very sharp, fast AF, nice OOF blur, well built, crispy colors. A jewel.
|
|
Cons:
|
No IS.
|
|
|
An outstanding lens.
|
|
|
Jun 13, 2012
|
|
polizonte
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 25, 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 8
|
|
Review Date: May 22, 2012
|
Recommend? |
Price paid: Not Indicated
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast focus, high contrast, brilliant colors, no distortion, great resolution.
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
Years ago I used this lens on my former 40D and was impressed. This year, while on vacation in Medellín, Colombia, I used another EF 135mm f2 mounted on a 5Dmkii and I was amazed. Colombia. Wildlife shots, landscape, portraits - a perfect lens on full frame DSLR.
|
|
|
May 22, 2012
|
|
wendra21
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jul 12, 2011
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: May 14, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $900.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
SHARPPPPPP!!! amazing bokeh, light, tough..
|
|
Cons:
|
i think 72mm
|
|
|
i just bought this lens... and i can't stop to say WOW, OMG.. love this lens.. BOkeh, sharpness, speed AF, weather sealing.. everything is almost perfect...
|
|
|
May 14, 2012
|
|
nswelton
Offline
Image Upload: On
Registered: Jan 16, 2006
Location: N/A
Posts: 234
|
|
Review Date: Apr 11, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
unbelievably sharp, inexpensive for what you get, light
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
best canon prime made and it can be had for a song on the used market. a bread and butter lens for wedding photography - once i invested in this lens i never again brought the heavy 70-200 2.8 to a wedding job again. 135 is long enough to shoot ceremonies with but also light enough to carry in a belt bag all day long.
|
|
|
Apr 11, 2012
|
|
Kevin Sherman
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Nov 11, 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1042
|
|
Review Date: Jan 19, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp sharp sharp, incredible bokeh, great value
|
|
Cons:
|
135mm can be a little long if you don't have a varied collection
|
|
|
Fast, light and sharp as heck. I love using this lens to cover the beam routines in gymnastics. the f2 vs f2.8 lets you drop a whole ISO stop cleaner, makes a HUGE difference in the quality of your pictures. The bokeh on a FF lens is so wonderful, it should be illegal.
Only caveat is that 135mm is pretty long, especially if you aren't using it on a full-frame body.
|
|
|
Jan 19, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
382
|
503170
|
Apr 30, 2013
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
96% of reviewers
|
$1,301.92
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
9.80
|
9.40
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
