 |
|
|
corgiwcn
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 8, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 50
|
|
Review Date: Aug 10, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $330.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Very sharp and contrasty; the color is nicely saturated and the bokeh is nice. Fast, accurate, and silent focusing. Solid build and good price.
|
|
Cons:
|
CA or blooming on digital sensors when wide open. It's possible to find them under an overexposed area even at f/8. Lousy hood attachment design.
|
|
|
Buy this lens.
The image quality deliever by the 85mm f/1.8 is very good. Wide open at f/1.8, it's much better than the 50mm f/1.8 II (As I said in the review of 50/1.8, this is probably caused by the 50mm's primitive autofocus system). When both lenses are in f/2.8, the difference is almost gone. The shallow DOF along with good optical elements produces very nice bokeh that cannot be found in 50mm f/1.8. The color rendered by this lens is very similar to the "L-color" found in my 17-40 f/4 and 70-200 f/4 without the feel of being "gaudy" or "flashy." Compared with my 70-200 f/4, the pictures produced by this lens are more smooth and the bokeh more natural. In subtle scenes like portraits (of humans or flowers) where high contrast is undesirable, pictures taken by this lens express themselves with grace without sacrificing any details.
The USM is ghostly silent, unlike my 50mm f/1.8 and 35mm f/2 It focuses quickly and accurately without hesitation. It is really joyful to use this lens in all kinds of applicable situations. This kind of description also applies to my 17-4 f/4.
You can only fault this lens's optics when it's shot wide open under more contrasty lighting conditions. I don't know whether film will respond like that, but my 300D consistently shows purple fringes (blooming or CA?) everywhere. The 50mm f1.8 also shows the same thing but in a much less pronounced way.
One the usability part, the hood is the worst kind of design I've ever seen: attaching and detaching is a constant struggle.
Overall, this lens is outstanding for its capabilities and quality. Moreover, the price is good for a lens with such build and optics.
|
|
 Aug 10, 2004
|
|
KevinRiggs
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 7, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 413
|
|
Review Date: Jul 23, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $275.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, contrasty, great bokeh, fast, lightweight, easy to handle, relatively quick to focus
|
|
Cons:
|
Little slower to focus than 70-200 f/2.8 L IS. Not built like a tank.
|
|
|
This lens excels at optical quality (perhaps it has CA around the outside of the lens but since I only have a 10D I don't notice it). It has a shallow DOF when opened wide but it is a wonderful lens to have.
I already had the EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS USM lens when a friend decided he wanted to unload this little gem. I considered, reconsidered, requested comments from other users on FM. I finally decided to pick this up and it is incredible. I can easily see uses for it that complement the 70-200.
The construction and focus speed are slightly better than the EF 50mm f/1.8 lens and I think the optics are better as well.
|
|
|
Jul 23, 2004
|
|
AlfonsoC
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 30, 2004
Location: Spain
Posts: 98
|
|
Review Date: Jun 8, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $325.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Lightweight, compact and razor sharp and contrasty. robably Canon will made a mistake by not putting a red line insted of a gold one on this lens.
Uses cheap 58mm filters, so for getting high quality filters for your lens you don't need to shell lots of bucks.
|
|
Cons:
|
None! love it and don't understand how I've been so many time without it.
Beware of shooting wide open to very near objects! Ridiculous DOF (focus on the eyes). Place your subject between 2 and 3 meters and you will be happy and everything will be in control.
|
|
|
Needed a sharp lense for many purposes (available lightning pg and outdoor portraits), this lens fills completely my needs regarding a medium tele for outdoors.
Use this lens sometimes for doing night clubbing photos with available light, along the 50mm f1.4 (are my two main ammo for this kind of work).
The quality of the lens allows you to shoot almost wide open (in fact mine lens peaks around f2.5). Many people blames about lens flare - use the hood! is ugly but makes their work well done. For many people this lens will rival with L counterparts without the associated expense of L primes.
With subjects between 2 and 3 meters of distance is their preferred distance, you can blurr the background magically going wide open.
The focusing is quick and reliable. It doesn't hunt nor fails (and you can ever focus manually thanks to the FT-M).
Many people asks to choose between the 85 1.8 & 100f2. For a 1.6 crop camera you will be quite happy with the 85 (around 135mm). If you insist on film (1.3 crop of FF), your best bet is the 100 or the 135mm.
|
|
|
Jun 8, 2004
|
|
thejaybird
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 9, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 1138
|
|
Review Date: Jun 1, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $360.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, fast focus, f/1.8, great build quality
|
|
Cons:
|
Chromatic aberration (with some sensors, anyway)
|
|
|
Paired with a good low-noise sensor, this lens is worth it's weight in gold in low-light conditions. I use it mostly for candids of my family. The only flaw is slight CA at wider aperatures. This may be a problem only with digital sensors (angle of incident light is more important with digital sensors than with film), but is almost always easy to correct. My favorite lens so far.
|
|
|
Jun 1, 2004
|
|
roanjohn
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 9, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 58
|
|
Review Date: May 4, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $350.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Razor sharp at f2.8 and beyond, beautiful bokeh, light and solid.
|
|
Cons:
|
CA wide open.
|
|
|
An excellent portrait lens. The buttery smooth bokeh this lens produces are amazing. Also an excellent companion with the 50 f1.8 for low light indoor events.
About the only thing I can say thats negative about this lens is that it produces purple fringing wide open and at f2. I have to return my first copy as it produces fringing even at f2.8. My second copy, thank goodness, is able to control it better.
All in all, would not trade this lens for anything...........Okay, maybe the 85 f1.2 L (but thats a different story, and pricepoint).......:-)
Ro1
|
|
|
May 4, 2004
|
|
Heather_R
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 6, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 197
|
|
Review Date: Apr 13, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $335.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
This is my favorite portrait and low light lens, especially for the money. Great DOF and bokeh. Excellent lens.
|
|
Cons:
|
none for me...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 13, 2004
|
|
Mr645
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 7, 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 1292
|
|
Review Date: Mar 26, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $329.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Small, silent and fast AF. Nice MF ring, excellent optics, low cost
|
|
Cons:
|
none that I can think of
|
|
|
I have been using this for studio portraits on a Canon D60 and Kodak 560. This lens is as sharp as any I have used. Beats the 24-70 and 70-200 F4 for absolute detail. I have not really had much of a chance to shoot it wide open, but from F5.6 to F11, it's probably one of the sharpest lenses out there. It's also small, light and easy to handle. Well built and the wide MF ring, and USM makes manual focus a pleasure.
|
|
|
Mar 26, 2004
|
|
kahfluie
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 25, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 116
|
|
Review Date: Mar 7, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $320.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
size, weight, fast focus, sharp and contrasty - excellent!
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
|
Excellent lens to use if you are shooting indoor concerts. Exceptional lens for low-cost. If this lens is not in your bag, you'll want to give it a try.
|
|
|
Mar 7, 2004
|
|
gmcfly
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 9, 2003
Location: Brazil
Posts: 81
|
|
Review Date: Jan 5, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $340.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, perfect portrait lens with 1.6 FOV, bright, very fast AF, good build quality.
|
|
Cons:
|
None. Just caution with large apertures: small DOF.
|
|
|
Sharp @1.8, very sharp @2.8 and more.
|
|
|
Jan 5, 2004
|
|
spartan123
Offline
[ X ]
Registered: Nov 9, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 3683
|
|
Review Date: Dec 6, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $325.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Everything
|
|
Cons:
|
Noticed some CA in photo's, soft wide open.
|
|
|
If this lens is not in your bag then it should be. The pictures provided from a lens at this price level are absolutely incredible.
|
|
|
Dec 6, 2003
|
|
ShootsQA
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 28, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 26
|
|
Review Date: Nov 20, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $320.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Size, weight, super quality
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
Absolutely my favorite lens in the bag. Super quality with really nice color and very, very sharp. No drawbacks at all.
|
|
|
Nov 20, 2003
|
|
ikiteboarder
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 27, 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 90
|
|
Review Date: Nov 12, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $330.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
very fast autofocus, excellent bokeh, sharp lens. 9.5/10 for this lens.
|
|
Cons:
|
doesn't come with lens hood
|
|
|
I've been using the lens along with my 300D for a few days now. Good people lens. On a 300D it's a 136mm - perfect for portraits.
When you use the wider apertures you have to make sure to focus on the eyes, else your pictures won't be useable. This is standard in all people photography, but with this lens it is even more important at f1.8 or other wider apertures. I find it to be sharp at f1.8 and do not experience any softness as reported by others - you will only experience it to be soft if you focused on the wrong point of your subject.
I can't find anything wrong with the optical quality, af focus speed or build quality. Money well spent.
|
|
|
Nov 12, 2003
|
|
Lars Johnsson
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 29, 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 32284
|
|
Review Date: Jul 25, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $355.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, Fast focusing, Good build quality, Great value
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
I really love this 85 mm lens. It's perfect for portraits on a 10D. Autofocus is very fast. The lens is very sharp also.
|
|
|
Jul 25, 2003
|
|
junbug
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 23, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 7
|
|
Review Date: Jul 4, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $300.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp, bright (f1.8), cost, good look on 10D
|
|
Cons:
|
misses focus sometimes
|
|
|
135mm equiv. on 10D. Perfect for my use (to get architectural details). Excellent image quality.
|
|
|
Jul 4, 2003
|
|
psquared
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 30, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 307
|
|
Review Date: Jun 4, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $275.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast AF; Excellent Bokeh; Silent focus; Sharp and Contrasty; Excellent value; Excellent build quality.
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
This is one of my favorite lenses in the lineup for portraiture and candids. The AF with the this lens is one of the fastest I've shot with, just lagging behind the 70-200/2.8L non-IS.
Shooting close quarters indoor candids, I tend to find this lens on my camera almost permanently for the working distance, the speed for lowlight, and the AF speed. This lens is very sharp around f/3.0 and up. Contrast and color are very good. Bokeh is pleasing.
|
|
|
Jun 4, 2003
|
|
hugoso
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jul 18, 2002
Location: China
Posts: 291
|
|
Review Date: May 27, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $300.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
fast focusing
sharp and contrasty, but not as good as 50/1.4
focusing accuracy is even better than 50/1.4
|
|
Cons:
|
my piece gethered quite a lot of dusts in the lens afer a few times uses.
|
|
|
excellent applicaion for snapshots of children/kids with 10D, even in low light.
|
|
|
May 27, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
307
|
463980
|
Feb 14, 2013
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
95% of reviewers
|
$349.50
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
8.92
|
9.46
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
