 |
|
|
brightondale
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 20, 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 1
|
|
Review Date: Jan 3, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $899.00
|
|
Anyone noticed the higher price tag on this lens lately? I saw the average price paid here was $633.50, but I didn't see it for sale anywhere for less than $700. I paid the B&H price because I didn't trust the lower price stores. I used to see them sell used for as little as $250 on ebay, now I never see them go for less than $600 on ebay.
I tried to first get it from Adorama (same price as B&H). After I placed the order, they sent me an email saying it was out of stock. If you order from Adorama, call to check for actual availability first since the website doesn't actually get this data. Or you could just go to B&H first where they will even tell you the exact day it would arrive before you place the order!
I haven't used the lens enough yet to give an evaluation.
|
|
 Jan 3, 2010
|
|
Kathy Li
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Nov 16, 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 13
|
|
Review Date: Feb 5, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $600.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
It's an 8mm circular fisheye; CA control much better than f/4 version; no vignetting. Wide-wide angle of view. Can cover sphere with four shots handheld.
|
|
Cons:
|
Not the sharpest; inaccurate focus scale and autofocusing at infinity; expensive.
|
|
A good solid lens that does its job well, if not spectacularly. I bought this lens to replace my copy of the f/4 version for cubic panorama shooting, and I'm very glad I did.
The image circle will have a bluish border to it, but unlike the f/4 version of the lens, vignetting has been eliminated, and the CA is much better controlled. And while a shade sharper than the f/4 version, it's still difficult to get tack sharp with the lens. Live-view has gotten some pano shooters realizing that the focus scale is inaccurate. Focus to infinity actually happens about halfway between the 0.5m and 1m marks.
I use the lens on a Canon XT, and on a crop body, it becomes halfway between a circular and a diagonal. This is actually very useful. I merely need to crop (or in moments of insanity use a 1.4x tc) to fill the corners, and I get a much wider FoV for pano shooting. You can indeed cover an entire spherical view handheld with four shots. If, however, you plan on shooting panos with a tripod and panohead more often than handheld, a Nikkor 10.5 might be a sharper choice.
|
|
|
Feb 5, 2009
|
|
burningheart
Online
Image Upload: On
Registered: Mar 20, 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1230
|
|
Review Date: Apr 27, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Excellent color, Great detail even at minimum aperature F3.5. Minumum focus distance is closer then advertised.
|
|
Cons:
|
Blue Vignette around the image circle. Occasionally the AF doesn't stop when shooting the picture
|
|
This is an excellent lens on the 5D. Colour and detail are excellent even at minimum aperature. The lens cap comes in two parts that you can use to advantage. Just take off the front cap and not the ring and you shoot a little less than 180 degrees. In this way you can block off the tripod leg, your feet etc. Watch out for stray light though as it will reflect off the ring cap. I found I could focus down to a couple of inches which is less than Sigma states. Fairly quick to auto focus but the odd time it continues to focus as the picture is being shot.
Here are some sample shots including Actual pixel crops.
http://www.robert-chisholm.com/Circular_Fisheye/index.htm
|
|
|
Apr 27, 2008
|
|
KETCH ROSSI
Offline
Image Upload: On
Registered: Sep 11, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 220
|
|
Review Date: Nov 25, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $667.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Good built, Fast AF very fun lens
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
This lens was purchase mostly to test the fun one can have with a distorted fisheye lens, and this Circular fisheye is the one I had chosen to do just that.
I like this lens a lot but it can not find space in my case as I would only use it in such a few situations that again it is not warted keeping.
But by no means this lens is not a keeper, infect I think is a great lens and would esitate in recomending it to any one I know that has a geographical, landscape or just need for a fun lens to shoot with.
I can not give a detailled review as I have use it so little (two times) but I like the images it produced and I would have loaded a simple one I just toucked for a fellow FM user that ask me to post in the buy/sale threads.
Buy it and have fun.
/Users/ketchrossi/Desktop/_MGL0922.jpg
Ciao,
KETCH ROSSI
www.KETCHFRAME.com
|
|
|
Nov 25, 2007
|
|
Tony Rogers
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jul 9, 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 81
|
|
Review Date: Jul 12, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
a full hemisphere in a circular image (on full-frame) - works well on Canon 5D
|
|
Cons:
|
learning to keep my feet out of the shot! Must switch off auto-focus to focus manually.
|
|
I haven't had this lens long - I will try to edit this review after I have more experience with it.
The lens feels solid and well made.
It has an unusual "lens-cap + ring" arrangement, because the front element has to protrude to be able to shoot a full 180 degree (horizontal and vertical) image. You can remove cap+ring together (it just tugs off)
It auto-focuses quite quickly and quietly. It does NOT have full-time manual focus - you must switch off auto-focus to use manual focus.
Although this lens can be used for scientific purposes, I intend to use it mostly for special effects. It's certainly not something you would use as a general purpose lens.
|
|
|
Jul 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
