 |
|
|
aladyforty
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 3, 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1348
|
|
Review Date: Mar 23, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,100.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
speed, focus, solid build, built in grip, beautiful files, easy to post process RAW shots, Battery lasts for ages
|
|
Cons:
|
noise of shutter is a bit loud, 10 megapixels although I'm not sure its that much of a con really
|
|
|
I decided to get this camera after struggling with the 7D focus and RAW images being so noisy. Picked mine up on eBay cheap with three batteries and it was in pretty good condition. I've used it in tandem with my 5DII at two weddings now and cant really pick which images come from which camera unless I look really close. The files are so easy to process and have a beautiful look similar to my old 5D classic. I cant really complain about anything with this camera, its become my go to over my 5DII
|
|
 Mar 23, 2013
|
|
Dono T
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 64
|
|
Review Date: Nov 4, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,100.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
frames per second, AI servo (focus in general is great, but the AI servo is what sold me on it), sensor size if you want something between full frame and 1.6x, viewfinder coverage, iso capabilities, battery life duration, build quality, dual card slots
|
|
Cons:
|
LCD screen.
|
|
|
Got a great camera for a great price. Will be a great pairing with my 5d2 for wedding photography.
|
|
|
Nov 4, 2012
|
|
mr_birdman
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 7, 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 10
|
|
Review Date: Oct 30, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Built like a tank. Easy to use once you know how a 1D layout works. Excellent customization options. Blazing fast AF acquisition and speed. A killer bird photography camera. Affordable now!
|
|
Cons:
|
None.
|
|
|
I dropped my 1D2n so got the insurance company to pay me the money out instead of repairing the camera. For nearly AUD2,500 I would've been nuts to repair a broken thing. And I LOVED my 1D2n, which I bought in pristine condition with 1,600 clicks just over a year earlier. I opted to get the 1DMkIII instead. The prices have dropped and to me the number of pixels is irrelevant as I am not a cropping (minimal crop is fine, but only minimal) type photographer like so many bird photographers in the universe. I like the challenge to get as close to full frame as possible. Even 8 megapixels is enough for book publications etc anyway. I bought the 1D MkIII and one thing I looked for was that the serial was not in the range of the numbers possibly affected by that AF debacle. I found one and bought it instantly. When it arrived I was astounded to see another pristine (albeit a little more used with around 40k shutter actuations) condition. It took me all of five minutes to set the CF parameters to my style of photography and had the first serious test run this morning. I am very pleased to say the least. AF is lightning fast with a bare 500mm f/4L IS USM lens and almost as fast with the EF 1.4xII TC. A little slower with the EF 2xII TC, but still fine. I can see a long love affair already with this camera body as it is just an insane piece of machinery to make sure I get the shot I want at the time I want it.
I would strongly recommend this camera, as it is a super bit of technology and now with prices at an all-time low you can pick-up a real bargain along the way. 10 megapixels are more than enough for most people I reckon anyway. It's not about the number of pixels in the end, but the quality of the pixels, the lens and the photographer's skill.
|
|
|
Oct 30, 2012
|
|
mrcolin2u
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 30, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 879
|
|
Review Date: Oct 25, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast accurate focusing. Superb picture quality. Its big and heavy, but I think this is a positive,I handhold most of the time and it feels solid !!
Excellent battery life.
|
|
Cons:
|
It's only 10mp , but I can live with that.
|
|
I've owned two Mark III's I regrettably sold the first for a MarkIV which I ended up selling and I bought another used mark III.
Here's a gallery of pictures taken with the markIII
http://mrcolin2u.zenfolio.com/p759804000
Colin
|
|
|
Oct 25, 2012
|
|
sivrajbm
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 15, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2772
|
|
Review Date: Oct 9, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,300.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Speed, handling, build, size, battery, Hi ISO performance
|
|
Cons:
|
19 selectable AF points
|
|
|
I got on the Mk3 train late in the game after selling my Mk2N's. I picked up a couple of these 3's for a great price and couldn't be happier.
Both bodies needed MAing to get the most from my lenses.
All the things I liked about my 2N's carry over here. I like the one button actuation and menu of the 3's (never thought the 2N's were a problem here). I still get the same keeper rate as the 2N's so I'm happy with that.
I like the Hi ISO performance and the speed boost writing to and viewing. I've been playing with these for several months now and I am very happy with them.
|
|
|
Oct 9, 2012
|
|
dalephill2
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Aug 26, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 736
|
|
Review Date: Mar 5, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Lighter than MKII and MKIIN, better battery, dedicated iso, 3.0 screen, liveview although manual focus, incredible clean noise even at 6400
|
|
Cons:
|
manual focus in liveview, can live with it.
|
|
I've had many cams, 10D,20D,30D,40D,50D,60D, 1D original,1DMKII,1DMKIIN, 1DsMKII, and the Images from the 1D3 out shines all, the noise from the MK3 is usable even at 6400 with alittle noise level from LR it is damn sweet, i do not see me needing another cam, the 60D with 18Mp does not look as good as the MK3, I did like the articulate screen and the live view and the wireless flash, but will forgo all of that for the images this puts out its that good. The cleanest ISO I have seen yet, have not put it agaist the D3s, or others no need.
these are all 6400 ISO
http://phillips.smugmug.com/Portraits/Portraits/i-NCLWBMk/0/L/9E3I8980-L.jpg
http://phillips.smugmug.com/Portraits/Portraits/i-GMQbj5c/0/L/9E3I8968-L.jpg
http://phillips.smugmug.com/Portraits/Portraits/i-NCm6jwm/0/L/9E3I8974-L.jpg
|
|
|
Mar 5, 2012
|
|
JackyFong
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Oct 15, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Built like a tank; lighter than the mk2; large LCD screen; fast AF speed; instantaneous preview of images after burst shots; one-touch preview like the EOS 7D; nice and crisp shutter closure sound
|
|
Cons:
|
Well, its MP count...
|
|
|
By chance I got hold of an used 1Dmk3 at S$2200/- with around 28K shutter count. Tested the set at an event. The EOS 1Dmk3 has fulfilled what its built for - durability and speed. Fast AF speed and shutter lag are its main advantages. It is built for event photographers who need their cameras to be "on the ball" always. Another good point about the mk3 is that its big 3" LCD screen. A tremendous amount of improvements over its mk2 brother on the preview screen. Now with the mk3, whatever burst rate I shot at, I got to preview almost straight on thanks to its dual "Digic III" processors - another leap over the mk2!
Next, the ease of previewing. A touch on the "preview" button instantly show the images taken. Its bigger brothers the mk1 & mk2, need to hold down 2 extras buttons and turn the dial before you could preview the images recorded. Now, with the mk3, previewing of images isnt a tiring and heretic task anymore.
My set of 1Dmk3 is combined with use of the EF24-105mm f4 L IS USM. on this 1.3 crop body, it is neither too wide or too tight. The experience gained using the 1Dmk3, with a f4 lens, an all round coverage of any event is almost possible without the need of a backup body. But having said that, I always believe in bring an extra camera body and extra speedlite, just in case!
With that, how I wish I could have the 1Dmk3 when it was first launch. Its latest successor, the 1Dmk4, triumph the 1Dmk3 over the megapixels count and cleaner noise level at higher ISO. But still, I reckon that 1Dmk3 will still be around for many years to come.
|
|
|
Oct 15, 2011
|
|
Jon_Doh
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 2, 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 116
|
|
Review Date: Sep 8, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $3,750.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
High quality files; need little pp. Fast accurate autofocusing. Accurate metering. Built like a tank, solid, weatherproof. Easy to operate controls - much better ergonomics than the pro level Nikons.
|
|
Cons:
|
Expensive. Smallish crop viewfinder. Wish it was a full frame camera or at least Canon used magnification in the viewfinder like Nikon.
|
|
|
Mine is a blue dot version and I've never had any problems with the autofocus. You do have settings and adjustments that can greatly change how the autofocus works, so be careful. The camera just handles like a dream. Autofocus is amazing, especially in low light and the meter is spot on. Shot a rapidly moving subject that is zig zagging and the camera will lock on and hold autofocus. Try that with the Mark IV and you'll quickly discover that Canon dumbed the autofocus down and it can't handle erratically moving subjects. This is where the Mark III simply shines along with superior low light focus.
It has features galore and can be highly customized. The detail in the raw images make you feel like you have 12 mp's, not 10. I've never found a need to shoot higher than 3,200 ISO, but images at 6,400 are very usable with light noise reduction.
|
|
|
Sep 8, 2011
|
|
photoelle
Offline
Image Upload: On
Registered: May 1, 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 242
|
|
Review Date: Aug 16, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Incredible AF, excellent IQ & colour quality, amazing battery life & build quality
|
|
Cons:
|
Heavy, lcd could be better
|
|
|
This camera produces very high IQ files, publishers just love them! The AF has never been a problem, its a blue dot body, and had the latest fix. AF is FAST and accurate for both sports and landscapes. Colour & contrast are well balanced and crisp, even in RAW files. The files can be described as "thick", and will take any amount of pp without falling apart. It is a heavy unit, but completely weather proof. The battery life is truly amazing.
|
|
|
Aug 16, 2011
|
|
jaredmizanin
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 19, 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 301
|
|
Review Date: Mar 19, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,275.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Awesome AF, impressive ISO performance, monster battery-life, weatherproof, built like a tank, dual memory card slots.
|
|
Cons:
|
No real complaints, although 12mp would've been slightly better, as would the current 920k LCD's.
|
|
|
I had no intentions of purchasing this camera, but a super cheap and low-mileage copy sprung up and I had to bite. On a cloudy day photographing gulls in flight, my former 50D just could not AF fast enough in the dismal light, so I tried the 1D3...no problem! The files are very low on noise...I feel comfortable going 1+ stops higher than I ever did before. And that battery...what longevity! If I am going out to shoot amphibians in the rain, this is my body (due to waterproofing).
|
|
|
Mar 19, 2011
|
|
dustnet
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jul 30, 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 5
|
|
Review Date: Oct 30, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $2,000.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
AF, Build quality, Speed, Feeling in hand
|
|
Cons:
|
10PM only, just a bit heavy, screen
|
|
Hi all,
As you all know, EOS 1D serie is the flagship Canon's serie. With the ESO 1D Mark III, Canon completely revamped it.
This camera is all about speed and build quality, don't buy it for anything else. If you need gorgeous image quality, rather go for a 5D II (about same price), but if you need an unsinkable tank that can take any job in any kind of weather, it's your choice, best for the money.
Hey, remember that a lot of people paid 4500$ for this body. I think that it goes very well with a 5D II, each bringing their specialty and creating a nice and well balanced kit.
As usual, here are my detailed pros and cons :
+ 10 fps is a nightmare in post but a dream for action shots. Even just for this feature, this camera worth it.
+ Build quality, weather sealing. I shot on heavy rain with it, no problem at all.
+ Double card (CF + SD), clearly nice to have.
- Well, 10MP don't leave much for cropping.
- In regards of latest sensors capacity, high ISO are not great.
- I would like more possibility in AF adjustments.
- Screen is a bit old, no way to use it for checking if something is sharp.
Need examples/samples ?
All wildlife and action shots are taken with the 1D on this story:
http://photography.emmanuelrondeau.com/index.php?mod=project_watcher&proj=7
Also check my blog for behind the scene tips.
http://blog.emmanuelrondeau.com/
Best regards,
Emmanuel.
|
|
|
Oct 30, 2010
|
|
CBDigital
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 26, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 315
|
|
Review Date: Jun 4, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $2,800.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Fast accurate focus, excellent image quality, fast, fast, fast
|
|
Cons:
|
Not much comes to mind
|
|
|
I last used a 1D shortly after the original 1D was introduced. I sold that when the 5D was introducted and have been using 5Ds and more recently a 5DMKII. The 5D and 5DMKII are exceptional cameras. The only thing lacking with the 5Ds is top notch focus ability. I have put the 1DMKIII through some typical use and I really like this camera. It is much more robust than the 5D series, focus is so much faster, very accurate, and the image quality is extremely good.
I give the camera a 9 rather than a 10 in overall rating because the 1DMKIII, like all of the canon systems, still has a inconsistent flash system. I've been using Canon ETTL for a long time, and I have learned to live with it, but it could be much better.
|
|
|
Jun 4, 2010
|
|
lwrnclightner
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 2, 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 611
|
|
Review Date: May 26, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Canon's top of the line algorithoms, superb IQ, confidence in knowing I will consistently produce in any shooting situation.
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
I recently acquired two mkIII systems. After owning the original 1d a while back, I knew I would never be happy until I was shooting with the 1d series. I put down the 1d mkI due to lack of modern tech and acquired the 40d which is more than capable in terms of image quality. However I longed for the focus reliability when it comes to using the outer points, the 40d was lacking in that area. I also wanted a crisper, clearer file, which is hard to describe but if you have ever shot with canons pro bodies vs the xxd line, then you possibly have an idea of what I am trying to say. I am not referring to noise, the 40d produces remarkably usable 3200iso files for me, and my leisure shooting with the mkIII's at iso 6400 shows me that I will not have to hesitate to use it when shooting for a client in concerts or a wedding if necessary.
The mkIII is the 40d on steroids and while I will continue to use my 40d's along side the mkIII's, when it comes to situations where I have to choose one or the other, it will without doubt be the mkIII.
It is an all around upgrade and will continue to be a top performer in my opinion for years to come. I probably won't feel the need to upgrade for at least 2 to 3 or more years. I simply don't have to have the latest technology to think I can get the job done. The mkIII is more than enough body for my style of shooting.
|
|
|
May 26, 2010
|
|
djpapa
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Nov 4, 2009
Location: China
Posts: 232
|
|
Review Date: May 24, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $2,400.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
1.3x ,Pro body feel, 2 card slots, battery life,C n custom, 10fps
|
|
Cons:
|
10.1 Megapixel ?
|
|
|
I have 5DII and want to buy second backup body for any event, 7D or used MarkIII both in my list ,after read difference review ,I'm still not sure which body suit until i try the MARK III in the shop ,and then ....Ooo
When i hold back my 5DII seem like not much better feeling in my hand...
Seriously don't try any ID's.....
This is not about the number of ISO or quality ..noise whatever ......
The camera plug with the battery grip is far from the feeling with IDseries.
That why i never buy the battery grip for my 5DII
***** about AF
I have to send back to CANON for fix the AF, the problem is the CMOS are in-correct position and make any pictures not in sharp focus(not focus shift) .
After that ....now FIXED ... all are wonderful .
5D2 is my backup body now....
|
|
|
May 24, 2010
|
|
Andre Goli
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 21, 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1819
|
|
Review Date: Apr 7, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $2,000.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
No more bulky grips
Amazing AF for moving object
Battery life (wow)
Lots of customizable functionnalities
1.3x nice to have for longer lenses when you already got another FF
Fast (120 frames/seconds)
File not too heavy because only 10Mp
Built like a rock
|
|
Cons:
|
Considering the new Mark4, would have loved to be 12mp because too close from the 1DII (8Mp) and far from the 1DIV (16Mp)
No videos
Noise after 3200 iso
|
|
|
After owning several FF like 5D and 5DII, wanted to try something faster and more professional... Got that one with a good price, and I am still amazed by its speed to focus, and to track moving subjects. Even the 85L I became very fast, even in low lite. Although I will keep my 5Ds for portrait, this one is becoming my walkaround. Perfect match with the my 85L and my 70-200L 2.8 for bokeh and IQ...
To make it short, even coming from the 5DII, this one is impressive... Will be perfect as a couple with the 5DII with eveything which is missing in the MarkIII from the MarkIV (low lite noise, big files and video) and which is into the 5DII. So I highly recommand it to anyone who already own a 5DII !
|
|
|
Apr 7, 2010
|
|
joshkrause
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 8, 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 126
|
|
Review Date: Mar 28, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $2,150.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Feels great, picture quality is astounding, 10fps, focus problems have been corrected and you can purchase one for cheap
|
|
Cons:
|
Heavy when paired with a big zoom lens, 10 fps eats up memory cards if you use it.
|
|
|
I love this camera. I had a 50D and a 7D and I sold the 50D to purchase a used 1D m3 and now I'm preparing to sell my 7D to get another. This camera is amazing.
The focusing is so fast, I love the 2000+ photo battery life, it fits my hand much better than a 7D with a grip, that's for sure.
I'm still figuring out the best setting for the AF servo, as it has many options and it does tend to jump around with focusing if you have the wrong settings. But when set properly, it's beautiful.
The best way to describe it:
"After driving a Ferrari, even a Porsche feels cheap."
|
|
|
Mar 28, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
138
|
173846
|
Mar 23, 2013
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
90% of reviewers
|
$3,747.88
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
9.73
|
8.61
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
