 |
|
|
Dpedraza
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 8, 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 45
|
|
Review Date: Apr 29, 2013
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $500.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
IQ, build, ergonomics, full frame,
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
This was my first Full frame camera that I bought. It took some adjusting to my wide angles, but it was def one of my top favorite cameras. Even at max Iso 3200 the iq isn't terrible at all. I loved this camera and for the price it's definitely still a good way into full frame and I would HIGHLY recommend the 5d
|
|
 Apr 29, 2013
|
|
oldschoolshots
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 29, 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Oct 29, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharpness, easy-to-use straight forward, weight, battery
|
|
Cons:
|
dust
|
|
|
This was my 2nd love in the series of film and digital camera bodies. First one was the old Contax RTS I used for a complete decade. This piece has the potential for that as well.
I like the grip of this camera and I find every button and feature without looking at it in darkness as I did with my old RTS. I don't care of a heavy list of features. The camera usage concept is simple and I don't miss anything really.
The battery charge lasts for a very long time including viewing images. I took just one charged battery on holidays without the charger and made hundreds of pics close to 1k without any problem.
The images are very sharp. Noise isn't a problem even if shot at ISO 3200. AWB is ok for outdoor. For indoor one should cool down the colour temperature a lot.
The sound of the shutter is not very nice like that of the 1d series, but very realiable, if the battery state is o.k. If something is wrong, the battery always was the reason.
AF accuracy is quite o.k. It is fast and hits the subject, if it is located in the screens center.
The only issue is dust. I never had a camera that had a viewfinder looking so ugly with dust in it than this one. Useless to clean it which is a nightmare anyway. It will attracts the dust again within the next 20 shots. Sensor dust is not a big issue. It's o.k., when you clean it with a brush every 6 mounths and change lenses carefully in a dustfree environment.
|
|
|
Oct 29, 2012
|
|
dhphoto
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 15, 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 8769
|
|
Review Date: Jun 14, 2012
|
Recommend? |
Price paid: Not Indicated
|
|
Pros:
|
Class-leading image quality even in 2012. Just great digital files (using RAW)
|
|
Cons:
|
Slow, clunky body, slow FPS, no sensor cleaning, no live view, no video, not 100% viewfinder, average focusing system (centre point only in reality), poor LCD, old-fashioned menus, no weathersealing.
|
|
|
An update to my first 5D review from 2005 (I think).
I've owned three of these over the years partly all at the same time, they are just fantastic digital cameras.
Don't expect to be spoiled though (which is a good thing) you actually have to set your own ISO (which is perfectly usable up to 1600 ISO with correct exposure and noise free at 800), you really have to use manual focusing or the centre AF point, I don't trust the others.
But it takes great pictures with a very convenient file size and no fuss. I've never had one fail.
It's a classic for a reason, it's supremely good at it's basic purpose, taking pictures. Use RAW and your brain and you won't be disappointed.
|
|
|
Jun 14, 2012
|
|
aladyforty
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 3, 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1349
|
|
Review Date: Apr 28, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $800.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Full frame, beautiful files
|
|
Cons:
|
clunky shutter, sensor gather dirt fast
|
|
|
I got the 5D "used" a couple of years ago and was amazed at the beautiful files, they have a creamy look about them and I prefer the look of them to my 5DII files. I only upgraded to the mark 2 for the bigger LCD and more mega-pixels. I have since sold the 5D but regret it. It is well built in my opinion. As a first time full frame I don't think you can go wrong. If you don't need video and just want to get into full frame cheaply, go for it
|
|
|
Apr 28, 2012
|
|
JesseShotland
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 17, 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 98
|
|
Review Date: Jan 8, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Full Frame,
|
|
Cons:
|
Cheap feeling body, bad battery life, small/low res screen
|
|
|
The 5D is the worst feeling camera to hold. It feels like plastic, but it's heavy like metal. The screen is low res, small, and discolored. The menu system is horribly lacking.
The only reason I absolutely love this camera is because it's full frame. Full frame to me is worth more any bells and whistles.
|
|
|
Jan 8, 2012
|
|
capitalK
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 25, 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1024
|
|
Review Date: Apr 23, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,000.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Comfortable size, even without the grip. Nice files.
|
|
Cons:
|
Low flash sync speed - 1/160th with non-Canon strobes. No intermediate 1/3 stops between ISO 1600 and 3200. Sensor is a dust-magnet.
|
|
|
Took me a long time to buy this camera. Wish I had tried it sooner. Files are beautiful out of it. I love the size of the body, IMO it doesn't need the grip unless you're attaching a long heavy lens to it (to balance it out) and this is coming from someone who was accustomed to a 1D. I don't really care about video at this point in time so I don't miss it.
Against my better judgment I used this camera to shoot basketball and when set up properly and using only the center focus point it actually performed fairly well. Not in the 1D league by any means but its not supposed to. Had to anticipate peak action because I didn't have 8 fps to bail me out to pick the best out of a sequence.
I would have marked it a 9.5/10 but because that wasn't an option I rounded it up to 10/10. This camera is not perfect but for me it comes pretty close.
|
|
|
Apr 23, 2011
|
|
veroman
Offline
Image Upload: On
Registered: Aug 19, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 3507
|
|
Review Date: Mar 17, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
• Image quality
• Image quality
• Image quality
|
|
Cons:
|
• None
|
|
|
Compared to the higher resolution, HD video and other bells and whistles of the latest cameras, the Canon 5D seems pretty basic if not bare-bones. It's LCD monitor pales by comparison to the newer ones, and auto-focus can sometimes be troublesome.
But if what you're looking for is a pretty simple high performance camera that does the job at any ISO up to 3200, that gives you a full frame image with all of the benefits of full frame, that has sufficient resolution for printing as large as 20" X 30", that's about as reliable a camera as you'll find anywhere — the Canon 5D Classic is your best option.
I actually sold my original 5D in favor of the 5D II. A few weeks later I sold the 5D II and went back to the 5D Classic. To my eye, those larger photo sites in the original 5D make a difference that I always appreciate.
This is one great camera. That's why it's referred to as the 5D "Classic." At today's prices (March 2011), it's an incredible bargain.
|
|
|
Mar 17, 2011
|
|
Joe Lang
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 24, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 56
|
|
Review Date: Feb 7, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 7, 2011
|
|
asamimasa
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 29, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 196
|
|
Review Date: Feb 7, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,000.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Cheapest option for full frame, controls noise very well (especially considering its age)
|
|
Cons:
|
No weather-sealing, not fitted with a great AF system, ISO button awkwardly placed, low FPS
|
|
|
If you're wanting to go full-frame but can't spend over a thousand, you're pretty much for sure gonna end up with a 5D. It's a great performer in terms of noise, especially considering its only got a DIGICII processor.
Unless you need atmospherically high ISO or 10FPS or weather-sealing, you shouldn't have too many complaints with this body.
|
|
|
Feb 7, 2011
|
|
nycandre
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 23, 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 22
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2011
|
|
psteidl
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Austria
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Dec 18, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $850.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
very sharp, lot of details, not too big files
|
|
Cons:
|
no dust reduce
|
|
for everyone who wants to update from an 40D or above its a very big increase of image quality. i also tested the 7D or the 1D, but fullframe is fullframe 
The autofocus is fast enough.
The display is smaller but better than the 40D's is.
This camera is still a a real keeper - if you do not need all the new "features" and just like to make pictures.
highly recomended
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2010
|
|
nycandre
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 23, 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 22
|
|
Review Date: Jun 22, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,500.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Not expensive at all nowadays!
Great image quality, full frame takes full advantage of all lenses.
Great high ISO performance, still a notch above the rest. Well, at this price, can't complain really.
|
|
Cons:
|
High ISO performance lags * A LOT* behind the latest Nikon D700, never mind the D3s.. and the 5D Mark II, well not so far behind that I don't mind waiting for the next Canon real step improvement in high ISO perfomrance.
Focusing is so so with few tracking spots - and sensor dust cleaning is a real pain to do.
|
|
There are many things I'd wish the 5D would do. But it was produced a few years ago, so have to accept its limitations.
Coupled with great lenses it produces superb images. Even its own jpeg processor is excellent.
Best camera at its price level, a classic certainly - about $1,100 used/ refurb nowadays.
Images .. well you be the judge:
Outdoor, shot straight into the sun. Minimal post processing, actually used the small JPG, excellent rendition, not much to add - shot at 2.8 70mm with the 24-70L
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nycandre/4720515983/
Nice bokeh, with indoor daylight, shot handheld @ ASA 800
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nycandre/4684025954
Shot with the 100-400L - this is an enlargment, about 1/4 of the picture - the 5D resolves the 100-400 just rigth
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nycandre/4525240397/
Now for the pixel peekers .. shot with the 24-70 handheld, this shows how much it resolves.. the original is about 16 feet high
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nycandre/4636229292/
|
|
|
Jun 22, 2010
|
|
CBDigital
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 26, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 315
|
|
Review Date: Jun 10, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,700.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Great color, particularly good skin tone. Good clean shots, file size is just about right.
|
|
Cons:
|
In many situations focus is limited to the center point. Lots of focus-recompose with this camera. But I am used to that now and it's not such a big deal.
|
|
|
I have been using the 5D since it came out. I have probably shot a half million shots with my various 5D bodies. It's a really great camera. I do mostly people photography and I prefer the skin tones that I get out of the 5D over the 5D MKII.
This camera is a classic. It may be outdated on the 'newest-bestest' scale but it will always take great pictures
|
|
|
Jun 10, 2010
|
|
bilfoto
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 19, 2010
Location: Serbia & Montenegro
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Mar 19, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Superb IQ, fast focus, superb high ISO..........
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
Everything is already said, this is a great camera. Highly recommend ....
|
|
|
Mar 19, 2010
|
|
dkmiles1
Offline
Image Upload: On
Registered: Nov 19, 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 502
|
|
Review Date: Feb 13, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Image Quality is just fantastic - makes my L lenses (70-200 F/4 IS) just shine!
|
|
Cons:
|
Dust magnet (which everyone seems to already know), clunky controls, no live view, only 3 fps
|
|
I use this camera in conjunction with my 7D. I refer to the 5D as my "Artist" while the 7D gets my "Athlete" designation.
Combined with the 70-200 f/4 L IS, the 5D is nothing short of breathtaking for outdoor beach shots - check out this shoot from last week on the beach in Southwest Florida.
http://www.kaidenmax.com/www.KaidenMax.com/Amy_%26_Mike_Slideshow.html
It helps when the subjects are just gorgeous and the sunset is perfect and of course the fact that you're on the beach too. But just the same, you get the idea, the camera rocks!
At its very core the 5D is an artistic camera for photographers - it simply takes great pictures.
Don't hesitate to pull the trigger is your most important goal is image quality. You won't regret the decision. Great camera!
|
|
|
Feb 13, 2010
|
|
fabianfoo
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jul 18, 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Dec 11, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Full frame 35mm sensor.
Fantastic image quality.
|
|
Cons:
|
Crappy LCD screen.
Out-dated autofocus system.
Limited customisability.
|
|
|
Wow the Canon 5D has been around for years now and it's still going strong. Why?
Simple - pure image quality. Raw image quality out of this camera is still awesome. Sure, there's only 12 megapixels to play with, but when it's this good and off a full-frame sensor, 12 megapixels is plenty.
Yes, other Canons have leapfrogged it in terms of other features such as autofocus, LCD screen, menu usability, custom functions etc etc but if that is not as important to you as image quality, then this camera is a bargain.
Every photo in the following collection was shot with a 5D. The wide shots with a Tamron 17-35mm f2.8-4 and the telephoto shots with the Canon 70-200 f4 IS USM.
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fabian-f/collections/72157605174362401/">Flickr: North India.</a>
|
|
|
Dec 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
220
|
270312
|
Apr 29, 2013
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
93% of reviewers
|
$2,697.07
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
8.91
|
8.59
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
