Digital darkroom
about | support
home
 

 

Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Post a Review
Reviews Views Date of last review
178 352708 Mar 31, 2003
Recommended By Average Price
96% of reviewers $1,167.51
Build Quality Rating Price Rating Overall Rating
9.42
8.31
9.5
ef_35_14_1_

Description:
L-series professional f/1.4 wide-angle lens with an aspherical lens element to correct aberrations. The floating system enables high picture quality to be obtained over the entire focusing range. Autofocusing is quick and quiet with rear focusing and ring USM. Full-time manual focusing is also possible.

Focal Length & Maximum Aperture: 35mm 1:1.4
Lens Construction: 11 elements in 9 groups
Diagonal Angle of View: 63°
Focus Adjustment: Rear focusing system with USM
Closest Focusing Distance: 0.3m / 1 ft.
Filter Size: 72mm
Max. Diameter x Length, Weight: 3.1" x 3.4", 20.5 oz. / 79.0 x 86.0mm, 580g
Keywords: EF 35mm f/1.4L USM
Darkroom software:
Stair Interpolation  PC | Mac Intellisharpen II  PC | Mac Dynamic Range Increase  PC | Mac
BW Workflow Pro PC | Mac FM Frames PC/Mac Noise Reducer (ISOx Pro) PC | Mac
Velvia Vision PC | Mac Web Presenter Pro PC | Mac Warm-Cool PC/Mac
Color Fringing RX PC | Mac Digital Soft Focus PC/Mac Color noise remover PC/Mac


 


Page:  1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11>  next
   
hatch1921
Offline
Image Upload: On



Registered: May 13, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2981
Review Date: Jul 16, 2010 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $1,260.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Super sharp! Great color and contrast. Hits at F/1.4 and does it well. Love the bokeh!!!
Cons:

Made use of the Bing cash back and Mr.Rebates.com... picked the lens up for $1260.

Bokeh is fantastic on this lens! I sold the Canon 24-70 to fund this lens...very pleased I did.

Well worth the money IMO.
Hatch


Full res samples here.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hatch1921/sets/72157624371998443/with/4795136074/



Jul 16, 2010
View profile View recent posts Visit Homepage Add hatch1921 to your Buddy List  
felipin
Offline
Image Upload: Off



Registered: Dec 1, 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 41
Review Date: Jun 16, 2010 Recommend? yes | Price paid: Not Indicated | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Sharpness, color, contrast.
Cons: None.

If you are a photographer, you MUST learn to shoot with a 35mm lens. And if you are a Canon photographer, you MUST choose this gem.

Jun 16, 2010
View profile View recent posts Visit Homepage Add felipin to your Buddy List  
leftheaded
Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: May 2, 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 0
Review Date: Jun 7, 2010 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $1,400.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: sharp fun lowlight indoor street
Cons:

this is my main walk around lens with a full frame sensor (5d mark 2). me and my family simply love the results this combo delivers. so fun

Jun 7, 2010
View profile View recent posts Add leftheaded to your Buddy List  
Mike Mahoney
Offline
Image Upload: Off



Registered: Mar 8, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 4381
Review Date: Jun 2, 2010 Recommend? yes | Price paid: Not Indicated | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Sharp wide open, colors, lack of CA and purple fringing, quick focus
Cons: Price, build quality, severe vignetting at wider apertures

Based on the many reviews and comments on this lens I was expecting to be blown away, but my overall feeling is just a moderate positive one .. yes it is a great lens, but nothing like the heaven sent experience some reviewers claim to have with it.

It is sharp from wide open and my copy has very little (if any) CA and zero purple fringing, even wide open. The colors are good and the bokeh renders a nice pop to your subject, even if it is a bit nervous. Focus is quick and accurate. And yes, it does have that certain "Je ne sais quoi" about it that separates it from the rest of the pack but let's get over it just a little bit .. it's not the holy grail of lenses.

Build quality is a bit plasticky (think 50 1.4 or 85 1.8), not on par with my 24-70 2.8, or even my 135L. And in $1,350 price range, it is a bit expensive for what you get.

If you're a dedicated prime user needing low light performance or just like wider angle bokeh this lens will suit you. But if you're using lenses in the 2.8 or smaller range look elsewhere.


Jun 2, 2010
View profile View recent posts Visit Homepage Add Mike Mahoney to your Buddy List  
LeoJan
Offline
Image Upload: Off



Registered: May 26, 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 0
Review Date: May 25, 2010 Recommend? | Price paid: $1,050.00

 
Pros: You can use this lens from F1.4. Lens is normal sharp, good color, nice weight and size. Nice bokeh.
Cons: Lots and lots of CA. Even at F8.0 I had green fringing in the corners. Not so very nice.

I use this lens very much and I love it and hate it. The CA is a real problem and sometimes simply ruin's you photo. I love 35 mm, if I should have to chose I chose 35 mm. And there is no alternative so you pay big money for a lens witch is far from perfect.

May 25, 2010
View profile View recent posts Visit Homepage Add LeoJan to your Buddy List  
djpapa
Offline
Image Upload: On



Registered: Nov 4, 2009
Location: China
Posts: 83
Review Date: May 25, 2010 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $1,400.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: image quality , colors contrast ,boken, special color tone.
Cons: none

This is the LENS I'm still miss it when i sold it almost 2 years for some reason.

special color tone in canon.
Amazing sharp and boken .



May 25, 2010
View profile View recent posts Visit Homepage Add djpapa to your Buddy List  
JetwashImages
Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Jan 24, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 39
Review Date: May 5, 2010 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $1,399.95 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Amazingly sharp, build quality, well balanced, bokeh, quick AF, contrast and color is outstanding. You get what you pay for.
Cons: CA wide open, not weather sealed.

Such an amazing lens. So sharp and really fun to use. I am using this lens on the Canon 7D. I cannot wait for the next rendition of the 5D (mark III?) to be introduced. I'm sure this lens on a FF body will produce even more incredible results.

I own several Canon primes now and can honestly say that I will probably never buy another zoom lens again. The 24-105mm F/4 L IS is convenient and has good sharpness but the 35mm/F1.4 L is on a whole different level.

The only zoom that I may consider is the new 70-200mm F/2.8 L IS II, just based off the positive reviews that say it smokes the original version... maybe this is a sign of good things to come for other Canon zooms that are released? Time will most certainly tell.

Back on topic, I highly recommend the 35mm/F1.4 L. There is really no need for Canon to introduce an updated version. Not much they can do to improve this fine lens other than maybe weather seal it.


May 5, 2010
View profile View recent posts Visit Homepage Add JetwashImages to your Buddy List  
willie mac
Offline
Image Upload: Off



Registered: Jun 15, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 22
Review Date: Mar 21, 2010 Recommend? yes | Price paid: Not Indicated | Rating: 9 

 
Pros:
Cons:



Mar 21, 2010
View profile View recent posts Add willie mac to your Buddy List  
Beverly Guhl
Offline
Image Upload: On



Registered: Nov 11, 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2948
Review Date: Mar 20, 2010 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $1,400.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Super sharp, DOF range, creative options, lightweight, size, solid build.
Cons: none for me

I'd come across some wonderful portraits of people and pets with a really shallow DOF and asked the photographers what lens they used, and this was it. I knew I had to have one. I LOVE this lens. It gives color, clarity, and sharpness mixed with a creamy bokeh that makes you just sit back and be awed by the images. The razor thin DOF can be challenging, but for creative, artsy effects for portraits, pets, objects it's fabulous. Landscapes and everything in between are rich and and crisp. The creative options and versatility make this a great lens to own. The price is probably just about right for a lens of this quality, but don't we all wish they were cheaper.

4 sample shots taken with this lens:

http://www.beverlyguhl.com/35L_samples/35L.html


Mar 20, 2010
View profile View recent posts Visit Homepage Add Beverly Guhl to your Buddy List  
Dietr
Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Feb 11, 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 9
Review Date: Feb 16, 2010 Recommend? yes | Price paid: $1,275.00 | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: Sharp, great perspective for casual portraiture, nice bokeh
Cons: None

Bokeh is just a little nervous compared to some of the other L lenses in this category...like the 50 and 85. But that is only a small problem and not a real concern. Lens is Sharp and I mean SHARP. Right from 1.4 the center is razor and the slightly wide perspective gives a great feel to casual portraits of children. Puts you right into the action and emotion of the shot. I sold my 50L to get this one and have ZERO regrets! For the shots where I want a creamy soft background I will mount the 85L.

Feb 16, 2010
View profile View recent posts Add Dietr to your Buddy List  
maiaibing
Offline
Image Upload: Off

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Location: Japan
Posts: 10
Review Date: Jan 8, 2010 Recommend? yes | Price paid: Not Indicated | Rating: 10 

 
Pros: colors, fast focus, build, bokeh,
Cons:

This lens delivers wonderful results. It is the perfect standard lens for a crop camera and it creates beautiful pictures on FF.

The bokeh is great, it's truely razor sharp from f/1.8 and only marginally soft wide open. It's focus is soundless and lightning fast.

I shoot mainly portraits with the 35L wide open and at f/1.6.and people are really impressed. Have also had many pictures published in all kinds of media from book covers over newspapers to TV with this lens.

Did I mention that the colors are deep and saturated too?

It can go close and take pictures at available light from amazing perspectives. For indoor use is shines at taking pictures of family and friends with both crop and FF.

Of all my lenses it is the one I will always bring along - and the one I use the most. It's worth every cent you pay for it.

It may show some CA, PF etc. wide open as others have mentioned, but so does the 50L, 85L and the 135L (a sacrifice made to improve the bokeh). For this reason I often tend to shoot @ f/1.6 for just a little better colors and contrast.

The 35mm 2.0 is a close as Pluto when it comes to functionality and image IQ.


Jan 8, 2010
View profile View recent posts Add maiaibing to your Buddy List  
Sobax
Offline
Image Upload: Off



Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 360
Review Date: Dec 20, 2009 Recommend? yes | Price paid: Not Indicated | Rating: 8 

 
Pros: Sharp even at 1.4, great colors and contrast.
Cons: 1st and 2nd copies with huge front focus....3rd perfect. Seems like there is some really bad copies on the market.

My advice: BUY IT LOCALLY ...not online....and DO NOT give it to Canon if you get bad copy...just go to the store and exchange. took me 7 weeks and 6 trips to Canon Service my 2nd copy (1st the same ) had a front focus....Canon service was not able to repair it...after 7 weeks the admit it and gave me new copy the 3rd one (which is great).
Cheers
Could be 10/10 but to much problems with those bad copies that I had.


Dec 20, 2009
View profile View recent posts Visit Homepage Add Sobax to your Buddy List  

   

ef_35_14_1_


Page:  1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11>  next