 |
Page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5
|
|
|
|
mike kobal
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Feb 12, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 454
|
|
Review Date: Mar 30, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
sharp wide open, very little distortion, light weight
|
|
Cons:
|
small mf ring, noisy
|
|
|
excellent optical quality throughout all appertures. (2.8-11) very usable above. on ff.
|
|
 Mar 30, 2003
|
|
GrizzlyMike
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 23, 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 403
|
|
Review Date: Mar 30, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $375.00
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp and detailed images. Nice contrast
|
|
Cons:
|
Inconsistant exposure?
|
|
|
Quite sharp and good value for your money. Sharper than the Canon 17-35 at this focal length. Nice contrast.
A few problems with overexpsure when this lens was used with the Canon D60. Metering was inconsistant and often produced overexposed images. Best shot on manual.
|
|
|
Mar 30, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
66
|
240159
|
Mar 23, 2013
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
92% of reviewers
|
$271.17
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
7.81
|
9.13
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
