 |
|
|
miataroy
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Nov 8, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 271
|
|
Review Date: Nov 29, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $6,000.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp! Great Price Fit and Finish
|
|
Cons:
|
No IS but I DID know this going in
|
|
|
This is my second copy of this lens... yea.. second.. Unfortunate fall took my last one.. as with the first lens this lens will render super images of great color and sharpness.. this like all long lenses is realized by employing good telephoto technique. A sturdy tripod or a good Bean Bag will do the trick.. Sigma really got it right with their long telephotos both the 800 5.6 and 300-800mm 5.6 are great hitters.
|
|
 Nov 29, 2011
|
|
KKFung
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Dec 19, 2008
Location: China
Posts: 1559
|
|
Review Date: Jan 10, 2011
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $5,368.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp image, fast AF
|
|
Cons:
|
too long MFD
|
|
|
Excellent PQ (sharp and nice boken), fast and accurate AF impress me when first time trying this lens after bought it recently.
I concern this lens have no stablizer before but now I found it is not an issue because I only use it for birding on a tripod
The only thing I found not good enough is the MFD, 7 meters sometimes force me need to step back when shooting small forest bird in close distance.
Excellent money / performance rating!!
|
|
|
Jan 10, 2011
|
|
HerbChong
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Dec 1, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 7276
|
|
Review Date: Jul 12, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $4,000.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
light for its length, inexpensive for its length
|
|
Cons:
|
not as sharp as manufacturer's primes
|
|
|
i bought a used version of the non-DG version of this lens and have been shooting birds and wildlife with it. before this, i was using a Nikkor 300/4 AF-S with Nikkor TC-14E II and TC-17E II extenders.
the 300/4 is an exceptionally sharp lens and is considerably ahead of the 800/5.6 in sharpness. however, with careful post processing with a good sharpening filter, it's possible to come close, certainly good enough for high quality 8x10 prints nearly indistinguishable from shots taken with the 300/4. at 11x14, there is a larger difference, but after post-processing, the results from the 800/5.6 are more than acceptable.
the 800/5.6 isn't as contrasty as my other Nikkor lenses. post processing can remove most of the difference, but images taken with it appear slightly flat compared to ones from my other lenses. this can be seen in side-by-side comparisons, but otherwise isn't noticeable.
the DOF on the 800/5.6 is extremely thin. even at 50 or 80 feet, a duck facing sideways will be entirely in focus, but a duck facing the camera will have at least one part of the body noticeably out of focus. larger birds can be worse.
AF speed is quite good on a Nikon D2-series body. it is able to keep up with larger flying birds at a distance and smaller birds that flit from branch to branch. using the focus limiter helps if the shooting range doesn't change much. it's not as fast as the 300/4 with the 1.4 extender attached, but the difference is small.
i have tried using a Kenko Pro 300 1.4 DG extender with the 800/5.6 and AF is inconsistent to non-existent even in very bright conditions. it's best to manual focus using an extender. the resulting 1120mm/8 lens doesn't deliver especially sharp results. it is better than just cropping and enlarging by 1.4X when printing, but not by much. the extra magnification also magnifies vibration blur.
the lens, like all Sigma lenses i have owned, has strange bokeh. it's not as obvious or as objectionable as i have seen in other Sigma lenses, but it is not a smooth as Nikkor or Pentax lenses that i own. the very limited DOF helps because if the bird is in the air or on a branch, the background is completely blurred. it's only when objects are near to the plane of focus that the bad bokeh shows up most.
at just over 10lb, the 800/5.6 is fairly light as far as ultra long telephoto lenses go, but even so, you will need a very sturdy support. i use a Wimberley head on a Gitzo 1325 and it is about as light as i recommend going. a 1548 would not be out of place supporting this lens.
the Sigma 800/5.6 APO EX HSM represents a good value in a super telephoto but at a noticeable, although acceptable, compromise in quality. much of this can be made up by careful post processing, but not all. it offers a good alternative to the manufacturer's offerings where cost is extremely important. it's the only AF 800/5.6 on the market and that counts for something.
|
|
|
Jul 12, 2006
|
|
raceroy
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jul 21, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 89
|
|
Review Date: Apr 5, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $3,000.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Size, Mechanical Build Quality, Image Quality, Fills a focal length hole in the Canon EF lens list
|
|
Cons:
|
Internal finish could be better
|
|
|
This review will be a simple one.. the other reviews have covered most issues well. This lens is sharp and as long as you employ good technique you will realize it's potential.. I have not been impressed with it's performance with Converters .. I have tried the Canon 1.4II the Canon 2X II and the Sigma APO 2X with mixed/poor results.. The lens begs for a stable platform.. I have been using a Gtizo 325 and a Wimberley with great success... Colors good, contrast good, AF great for getting you close and then manual to tweak... and with a lens of this length, tweak is something you have to do.. as depth of focus is THIN .. but back grounds creamy smooth... and after all, that is what I bought it for!! This is the EX HSM model and I am told that the DG model has addressed my only beef with this lens .. the internal finish.. How does this compare to my 500 F4 IS? Well I will say this.. I do miss the IS !!!!! Big time... but extra reach without the degradation of an extender WOW... money well spent!!
|
|
|
Apr 5, 2006
|
|
TimMunsey
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 6, 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1748
|
|
Review Date: Apr 7, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, cheap, light for size.
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
To see for yourself how good this lens is have a look on my website in the 2004 section I've indicated which lens was in use. www.wildphotolife.co.uk
Sadly sigma are no longer making this prime, and now only produce the 300-800mm, so this review is only of use to those looking for second hand ones.
It's a big beast but as I've said its light for its focal length, at 4.74Kg its lighter than the 600mm canon and 600mm nikon. So a tripod is needed, but I have shot many flight shots handheld successfully, also have taken shots at low speeds balanced on walls and fence posts. It's just a matter of technique. With extension tubes its a cool, if somewhat excentric, macro lens. The bokeh is excellent.
I have sharp images with a 1.4 teleconvertor, I don't have a 2x so haven't tried that.
It's a bargain!!
Tim Munsey
|
|
|
Apr 7, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
5
|
91925
|
Nov 29, 2011
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
100% of reviewers
|
$4,592.00
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
8.20
|
9.40
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
