 |
|
|
stan_g
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 9, 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 232
|
|
Review Date: Mar 31, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $1,500.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp, Fast AF
|
|
Cons:
|
size/weight
|
|
|
Amazing lens, if you don't need or can't afford the IS version, a great used value. Still not cheap as it is well known as a excellent lens.
|
|
 Mar 31, 2003
|
|
sdai
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 3387
|
|
Review Date: Mar 30, 2003
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
One of the two best zooms Canon ever made
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
Enough has been said about the 70-200, I tried this one but bought the IS version because I thought IS might be good ... but then I replaced the 70-200 with several primes within its range. If I will ever buy it again, I would definitely choose the non IS version - despite the addition of IS, there's no quality difference between the versions ... it's all about your own shooting style.
|
|
|
Mar 30, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
178
|
390482
|
Jan 26, 2013
|
|
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
|
98% of reviewers
|
$1,132.91
|
|
|
Build Quality Rating
|
Price Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
9.85
|
9.11
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
