|
|
Alex Yang
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jun 29, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 56
|
|
Review Date: Jul 11, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
easy to use, works perfectly with E-TTL II, cheap
|
|
Cons:
|
no manual controls, but you knew that going in.
|
|
I got an excellent deal for this on craigslist, and it has exceeded my expectations. I was using a 380ex for a while, but needed a swivel head. I exposes perfectly, and i was contemplating selling back the 580ex i just bought that is on the way. I need the manual controls though. For slave use, this is a great flash, if you can find one for a good price. recharge time is good, as long as you're not doing sports.
|
|
 Jul 11, 2007
|
|
marklarry28
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Aug 20, 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 20
|
|
Review Date: Sep 5, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Meet all my needs
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
I got an used 420Ex for a good deal. Henrys
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2006
|
|
svx94
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Mar 25, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 591
|
|
Review Date: Aug 28, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $180.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Light, very functional - GREAT PRICE
|
|
Cons:
|
Not for this price. Some controls can be easier, which Canon fixed them all with the new 430EX.
|
|
I bought 420EX as my first flash, knowing it will be the slave unit once I got a 550/580EX. I rearly rate anything 10 out 10, but for what I've paid, (and I know what I will get by then), I think 9 is not fair for this little flash. Whenever I use one flash, I still prefer the 420ex. Now I got two of them.
It works as salve flash, it does exactly what it should, and worked very well for me.
It is hard to find new ones now, and I am lucky to get it from B&H while it is still available 
|
|
|
Aug 28, 2006
|
|
arjini
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 12, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 37
|
|
Review Date: Mar 3, 2006
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $150.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Much more powerful than the built in flash on 20D. Tilt, swivel, cheap. Not as flimsy as I imagined once attached to the camera. Quite a deal if you get one used.
|
|
Cons:
|
Battery door does indeed suck. No manual controls.
|
|
Only real dissapointment was that despite the fact that I didn't think I needed manual controls, the very first thing I wanted to do was manually fire the flash a few times. Although I've been photographing for coming on 10 years now, I've never done any flash photography, so when I finally got the hang of getting at least some control over the flash, I was really impressed at the power of it. For the discerning flash photographer I'm sure this is the bottom of the barel, but for someone like me who has only used available light, suddenly being able to light objects from 30 feet away is pretty neat!
|
|
|
Mar 3, 2006
|
|
jgonzo
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Dec 18, 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Dec 22, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Price, acceptable speed, slave, movable reflector, stand, case
|
|
Cons:
|
Batterybox, missing 45°-position at reflector
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2005
|
|
abam
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 25, 2005
Location: Austria
Posts: 2236
|
|
Review Date: Sep 13, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 7
|
|
Pros:
|
i can only speak from my own experience. the 420ex works great in a 550ex/420ex/ST-E2/softboxes setup. with the ability to set FEC in the camera with canon's A digital bodies, and the ST-E2's ability to set ratios, you still get quite a bit of control over your 420ex's output. people sometimes bemoan the lack of manual controls; in complicated lighting situations they might have a point, but pertaining to most users (one and two flash setups) i'd worry more about light forming techniques (placement, ambient light, white balance of all contributing light sources, softboxes/umbrellas/bounce cards) than the shortcomings of the 420ex itself.
bounce capabilities are nice, works well with a sto-fen indoors (or gels to throw some color onto a background wall or scene behind the subject.
|
|
Cons:
|
no manual controls for as expensive as it is (at least 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 power settings would have been neato), although many problems with the 420ex can be overcome now that FEC is included in all of canon's digital cameras (now that the 300d has been retired). this was still a 200+ euro flash (unfortunately i bought it just before the 430ex came out and the 420's price was discounted. at least i could cash in on the 50 euro rebate:)). for 200 euros, you can get alien bees. the canon flash prices are rather high for what you get.
i recommend this flash only for those either needing a slave to complement their current flash setup, when a 550ex or 580ex are out of the question, or for the casual shooter that's looking to expand into fill flash.
|
|
reliable little slave flash in a wireless canon system. beefy enough for bounce flash indoors (smaller rooms). ok value, but consider the 550ex if you can swing it. (yes, the 580ex is out, but it's price isn't justified for non-professionals. the 550ex is more than enough for advanced enthusiasts).
happy shooting...abam
|
|
|
Sep 13, 2005
|
|
Canalman
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jul 24, 2005
Location: Panama
Posts: 6
|
|
Review Date: Aug 6, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $179.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
With the Rebel XT nothing, with the 20D very impressive nite shots..
|
|
Cons:
|
None for now....
|
|
Got mine to use with the Rebel XT, was dissapointed after I took some nite indoor shots, all pictures came out dark or too dark, like I dont use much nite shots I didnt pay too much of attention to quality until I decided to upgrade my camera to a 20D, I was going to get the 580 but made a test shot with 20D and the 420, same place same lightning almost same everything, camera was at same settings as Rebel XT, when I took the first shot and WOW! what a surprise, all pictures came out perfect, dont know what happened here, I am no expert,but photos came out impressive.
|
|
|
Aug 6, 2005
|
|
Rhys
Offline
[ X ]
Registered: May 5, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 3578
|
|
Review Date: Jun 27, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $200.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
That which it does, it does very well. I found the af assist to be helpful, the flash delivers just the right amount of power without overflashing the subject. The XT flash underflashes but this delivers the right amount when mounted on my XT
|
|
Cons:
|
The battery door is flimsy, awkward to open and I cannot imagine it'll be very long before it snaps off.
|
|
I bought this to replace the built-in XT flash and to use solely for portraits. Thus far it's an excellent performer and I have no regrets. I'm amazed at how fast it will recharge.
|
|
|
Jun 27, 2005
|
|
sino408
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Dec 30, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 900
|
|
Review Date: Mar 2, 2005
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $179.95
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Price, slave for 550EX+ flashes, swivel, tilt, zooms
|
|
Cons:
|
No manual override for distance, prolematic for any camera with a multiplication factor or lens that can't communicate zoom distance with camera. Only 90º swivel to the right. Can't use partial flash
|
|
Great deal for beginning photographers who want a more powerful flash than the native flash. Priced at almost half of the Canon 550EX, this flash is quite a bargain. Not recomended for pros (but you pros all know that already 
Good points include zooming based on lens, tilt from 0 to 90º, left swivel from 0 (directly in front) to 180 (directly behind) and right swivel from 0 to 90 (directly to your right). Also infrared metering in lowlight.
The lack of manual override is really bothersome if you don't have a lens that can communicate zoom distance with your canon (the flash automatically sets itself back to 24mm). This is also bad for cameras with multiplication factors since whatever coverage it indicates on the flash is always wider than the actual composition - you are essentially wasting light when flashing. The unit also cannot function unless fully charged, so no partial flashes.
|
|
|
Mar 2, 2005
|
|
atlantagreg
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 26, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 11
|
|
Review Date: Nov 27, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $229.00
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Reasonable price. Good features (swivel, etc). Decent coverage.
|
|
Cons:
|
AF assist light is not bright enough, causing some focusing problems.
|
|
Well I won't repeat everything else that's already been said by others on this. I use the 420EX on a Canon 10D, and for the most part in the short time I've had it, I like it.
There is ONE quirk, however, to be aware of. Especially if you're also a 10D user. The 10D usually uses it's pop-up flash as an AF assist light, giving out a "strobe" as the assist, locking focus, and then taking the shot. With the 420 attached it of course, can't do that, and relies on the built-in AF assist the 420 has, which is MUCH weaker.
So long as room lighting is fairly decent and the subject is pretty close it's fine to finetune the focus, but I have found that when this is not the case, the 420's AF assist will fire, and the camera will give a confirmation beep as though focus is locked on correctly, when it is not. It gives a false-positive lock, giving you a blurry photo as a result. It would have been better if Canon had incorporated a much stronger AF light on this flash unit, or, used a laser focus light similar to what Sony uses on it's cameras which works very well.
With the exception of this one quirk however, everything else is fine. It's worth adding this to your collection as you will soon discover that "bounce flash" effects are much better than using direct built-in camera flashes.
Greg
|
|
|
Nov 27, 2004
|
|
jtmcz777
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 25, 2004
Location: N/A
Posts: 3
|
|
Review Date: Sep 25, 2004
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $230.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Swivel and bounce, price, lightweight, uses all 7 focus points of the 10D and 300D
|
|
Cons:
|
Limited settings, Canon should have paid more attention to the design of the battery door
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 25, 2004
|
|
Sneakyracer
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 554
|
|
Review Date: Jul 18, 2004
|
Recommend? no |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 6
|
|
Pros:
|
Price, Size (small), Power (very good)
|
|
Cons:
|
VERY slow to recycle, rather flimsy/awkward battery door, and again slow from shot to shot.
|
|
I shoot events professionally from time to time and i get really anoyed waiting for the flash to fully recycle. Other than that its a good flash but i do miss the Nikon SB28 i had (when i used a fuji s2) which is similar in size but a tad more powerfull and MUCH more versatile since it can be manualy set at any power level right on the flash and also has a PC sync terminal! Something BOTH of Canons Flashes lack, yes even the 550ex doesnt have it.
|
|
|
Jul 18, 2004
|
|
|
