|
|
dave chilvers
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jan 11, 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1702
|
|
Review Date: Jan 22, 2012
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Hardly notice hen it`s in place
|
|
Cons:
|
None really
|
|
|
Glad I purchased mine a few years ago before the price increases. Having said that I must say that without checking the exif data it`s hard to tell when you have used it or not so even at the latest prices its worth the money IMHO. I`m using it now on my 70-200f4 IS and I couldn`t be more pleased with the results! it`s that good. You`ll be surprised how handy that extra bit of reach can be. I keep it on the lens all the time as I only reach for the 70-200 when I need a decent tele and it`s a breeze to remove it if you need the 70mm end. It`s also good on the 135 but I rarely use that combo.
|
|
 Jan 22, 2012
|
|
juan65
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 4, 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 305
|
|
Review Date: Mar 23, 2010
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $250.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Incrise focal length 1.4 times, sharp, read below
|
|
Cons:
|
none, if you read a lot before you buy it
|
|
I found this TC in c...gs list from a local guy, it is pristine like new on it's box,
I was able to test it at the site with my 7D and 300 F4 IS USM,
check a picture a shot here; http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/ufiles/18/418718.jpg
I Recomend to test it in a tripod and with manual focus, you can deal with the micro adjustments later if your camera suports it.
I recomend you read a lot before you decide to buy it.
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2010
|
|
Phil UKNet
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 20, 2007
Location: Thailand
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Apr 9, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
A light, easy and not too expensive way to extend the focal length of your existing lenses with no noticeable degradation in image quality. Minimum focusing distance of the lens remains the same when the teleconverter is used.
|
|
Cons:
|
One stop loss of light. A bit fiddly assembling in the field. Used with lenses that have F5.6 maximum aperture, this is reduced to F8 which then means that autofocus won't work on xxD bodies.
|
|
The 1.4x converter works very well on my 300mm F4L IS and 70-200mm F4L IS lenses. It's small, light, easy to carry around and gives me a lot more flexibility.
There's not a great deal else to say. I've read lots of reports about image degradation but although this may be noticeable under lab conditions, I can't see it in real world photos.
Judge for yourself. I've posted some shots using the lenses mentioned above with and without the teleconverter. These images will give you an idea of both the magnification effect and the image quality.
http://phil.uk.net/photography/canon_14x_teleconverter.html
|
|
|
Apr 9, 2009
|
|
Lon Houseman
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 6, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 51
|
|
Review Date: Apr 4, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Excellent product, not much added weight. MIne is the old MK1 version.
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
|
Here are a couple of test shots in my back yard of a 200 2.8 cropped to match the 200 2.8 with 1.4TC
http://www.lhouseman.com/20090404-200mm-vs-200plus14tc/
|
|
|
Apr 4, 2009
|
|
Badmono
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 9, 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Mar 19, 2009
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Must have product if you use 'L' primes
No noticeable Image degradation
Fair price for doubling your lenses usefullness
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
Works well with all my 'L' primes and extends their usefullness
Small and light - retains the weatherproofing.
No noticeable slowing of AF when used with 400 F2.8 IS - in fact the 400 F2.8 ought to come with this convertor as standard, when this combination makes Canon's 500 F4 and 600 F4 'L' primes obsolete IMO.
|
|
|
Mar 19, 2009
|
|
scalesusa
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 2, 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 3571
|
|
Review Date: Nov 15, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $265.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Lightweight, keeps the existing focus range of your lens
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
|
Something often missed is that the extenders also work with the TS-E 90mm Tilt-Shift Lens. This is already a close focusing prime lens, and very sharp. With a Extender, you get more magnification so that it can double as a Macro lens, and the tilt mechanism helps you take macro shots that are in focus over a greater depth for those cases where you cannot physically put the axis of your lens perpendicular to the object.
|
|
|
Nov 15, 2008
|
|
philber
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: May 20, 2008
Location: France
Posts: 10289
|
|
Review Date: Jul 16, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
maintains lens IQ, solid build, works without fuss
|
|
Cons:
|
Nothing at all
|
|
|
I use it mainly with my 135L, giving me an equivalent just short of 200mm, f:2.8. I just love it. For modest price and weight increases, I own another L lens, same fabulous IQ. It also goes well with my 300mm f:4, which it stretches to 420mm f:5.6. What's not to love?
|
|
|
Jul 16, 2008
|
|
sivrajbm
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Mar 15, 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 3430
|
|
Review Date: Jun 26, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $240.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Great quality, only one stop light loss, works great on my 135L & 70-200/2.8is, weather sealed
|
|
Cons:
|
one stop light loss, slows lens focus slightly
|
|
|
Works great with my 135L and 70-200/2.8is. Slow AF slightly, Provides excellent IQ.
|
|
|
Jun 26, 2008
|
|
Pat DiGeronimo
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Sep 30, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 111
|
|
Review Date: May 12, 2008
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $295.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Out of this world.
|
|
Cons:
|
Auto focus on larger lens.
|
|
|
I have trouble getting the autofocus to work at the longer focal lenths of my Canon 100-400, 4-5.6. But I love it.
|
|
|
May 12, 2008
|
|
Hitendra
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 15, 2007
Location: India
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Oct 23, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: $299.00
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Build & Image quality.
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 23, 2007
|
|
Colin Key
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Jul 8, 2007
Location: Portugal
Posts: 637
|
|
Review Date: Aug 27, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
An excellent way to give me 700mm on my 500mm f/4 with no obvious deterioration in IQ when mounted on my 400D (XTi) or 1D Mk III.
|
|
Cons:
|
None really (but see comment below).
|
|
|
Have only used this on two lenses: my 500mm f/4 and my recently acquired 100-400mm zoom. I am a bit disappointed with the extender's performance on the zoom - it seems to slow down the AF on my Mk III and the shots look a little "soft". With primes I think it is excellent.
|
|
|
Aug 27, 2007
|
|
rwangsa
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 0
|
|
Review Date: Apr 27, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
doesnt affect image quality at all - cheap
|
|
Cons:
|
slow operation
|
|
|
Replying to question from Chris Frank, I am using 70-200 f/4 with IS, and it works! Strange they did not put that one in the list.
|
|
|
Apr 27, 2007
|
|
CyberDyne
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Oct 7, 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1566
|
|
|
Mar 9, 2007
|
|
Herb Houghton
Offline
Image Upload: On
Registered: Feb 14, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 29637
|
|
Review Date: Mar 3, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
image quality,price
|
|
Cons:
|
none yet
|
|
|
Ive had this for a week with the rebel XTi body and the 70-200 F4 L lens. It has very clear images. It's on my rebel all the time now.
|
|
|
Mar 3, 2007
|
|
motionid
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Location: Japan
Posts: 1
|
|
|
Feb 24, 2007
|
|
aladyforty
Offline
Image Upload: Off
Registered: Feb 3, 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2027
|
|
Review Date: Feb 21, 2007
|
Recommend? yes |
Price paid: Not Indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
wonderful, little reduction in photo quality
|
|
Cons:
|
none so far
|
|
Ive only had this for 3 days but so far Im impressed. Ive done a bit of testing attaching this to my 70-200 F4 L lens and its quite sharp.
heres a few of my first test shots
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/511119
If you cant afford another lens, get one of these.
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2007
|
|
