NEX Images Thread
/forum/topic/969329/592

1       2       3              592      
593
       594              705       706       end

Paul Yi
Registered: Dec 10, 2004
Total Posts: 5316
Country: United States

Rokkor 100/2.0






freaklikeme
Registered: Apr 08, 2005
Total Posts: 5887
Country: United States

Taylor Sherman wrote:
freaklikeme - thanks for the pics. Very interesting how variable the shift is. Usually when I get shift that strong in some of my shots, it's still noticeable in others (meaning with other lenses, no personal experience with that one).

The results, color shift aside, look pretty good. I think if I didn't already have the Elmarit 28 I'd be looking at getting the ZM25.


Anytime, and yes, with the exception of the Elmarit 24, that's been my experience as well. I don't have a shot with the pre-ASPH Elmarit 21 or CV 15 that don't show the shift, regardless of focusing or subject distance. Which version of the Elmarit are you using?



freaklikeme
Registered: Apr 08, 2005
Total Posts: 5887
Country: United States

sebboh wrote:
freaklikeme wrote:
sebboh wrote:
went to the beach today where it was unusually hot (for SF). here's a 50% crop from nex-7 + nikkor 105/2.5 AIS:

who says only the x-trans sensor can produce a watercolor effect?


That's cool. I love what it did to Cliff House.

That happened to me to a lesser degree when I was in Aptos last year, only the air temperature was fairly cool (mid-70s at the peak of the day). So I panicked when I saw the results, thinking there was something wrong with the camera, and it was probably an hour before I thought through the fact that the sand had the sun beating down on it all day, so the surface temperature was high, even though the air temperature was mild.


yeah, i probably would have been freaked out if the effect were less dramatic. i could really see the distortion happening in front of me without the camera.

i was fooling around and broke the picture into 4 little pieces (all basically 100% crops) that i kinda like:







I like the first one. The background kind of kills the second one for me. This one feels like a game. "Spot the vaguely pornographic elements."


freaklikeme
Registered: Apr 08, 2005
Total Posts: 5887
Country: United States

sculptormic wrote:
Agree with freaklikeme about the colour shift with the Biogon.
Close by it performs quiet well on the NEX as you can see in the tractor series.
Well I am glad I tryed it but I must say I overall prefer the lens on the GXR.

Where it is very obvious also is with surfaces like the next picture.


This one is a 5 image stich at infinity. I tryed to stich them before doing PP on each photo individually.
You see a dark vertical line above the bush. I tryed to get rid of it but it was beyond my skills in ACR. Very annoying.


Interesting. I wonder what causes that behavior.

I agree, though the trade off with the GXR, aside from resolution, is that you'll be correcting for moire instead of color shift. Even on the 7, moire is an issue with this lens (it's evident in every highlighted bit of fence on my first infinity shot). I really wish the GXR made me want to use it, but perfect corners just aren't enough to make me want to bring it instead of the 7.

And, yeah, there's no way to get around correcting the shift first before stitching. It's just like vignette correction, if you don't do it before stitching, you will likely never get it corrected on the full image.



Taylor Sherman
Registered: Mar 26, 2012
Total Posts: 1206
Country: United States

freaklikeme wrote:
Taylor Sherman wrote:
freaklikeme - thanks for the pics. Very interesting how variable the shift is. Usually when I get shift that strong in some of my shots, it's still noticeable in others (meaning with other lenses, no personal experience with that one).

The results, color shift aside, look pretty good. I think if I didn't already have the Elmarit 28 I'd be looking at getting the ZM25.


Anytime, and yes, with the exception of the Elmarit 24, that's been my experience as well. I don't have a shot with the pre-ASPH Elmarit 21 or CV 15 that don't show the shift, regardless of focusing or subject distance. Which version of the Elmarit are you using?


The latest, the ASPH. It's tiny!



freaklikeme
Registered: Apr 08, 2005
Total Posts: 5887
Country: United States

Taylor Sherman wrote:
freaklikeme wrote:
Taylor Sherman wrote:
freaklikeme - thanks for the pics. Very interesting how variable the shift is. Usually when I get shift that strong in some of my shots, it's still noticeable in others (meaning with other lenses, no personal experience with that one).

The results, color shift aside, look pretty good. I think if I didn't already have the Elmarit 28 I'd be looking at getting the ZM25.


Anytime, and yes, with the exception of the Elmarit 24, that's been my experience as well. I don't have a shot with the pre-ASPH Elmarit 21 or CV 15 that don't show the shift, regardless of focusing or subject distance. Which version of the Elmarit are you using?


The latest, the ASPH. It's tiny!


Nice. And it is tiny, particularly compared to the Biogon. What would you say its strengths and weaknesses are on the NEX?



sebboh
Registered: Nov 02, 2009
Total Posts: 10763
Country: United States

50 lux pre-asph wide open:











SKumar25
Registered: May 18, 2006
Total Posts: 1939
Country: Australia

Nice sets Paul / Sebboh.

Sebboh, enjoying the old school Leica rendering...



Taylor Sherman
Registered: Mar 26, 2012
Total Posts: 1206
Country: United States

freaklikeme wrote:
Nice. And it is tiny, particularly compared to the Biogon. What would you say its strengths and weaknesses are on the NEX?


Hmm.

+ great colors
+ high contrast
+ tiny
+/- f/2.8 is good but can feel a bit limiting some times
+/- strong vignetting at f/2.8, I generally like that though
+/- 42mm effective FL is good; I like it better than 50mm I think in general, but close to 35/36mm (I don't have a 24 that I use right now, though, so I guess that's moot).
- high contrast, when it's overcast around here it just takes some work to make the image not look like all white and black
- needs cornerfix on the 7 (but not on the 5N or 6)
- I like ZM-style focus "nubs" better than these poky tabs on the Leicas. The only ergonomic thing I don't like about them really.



alwang
Registered: Sep 02, 2011
Total Posts: 1050
Country: United States

All with CV15, converted with Silver Efex:


dock stumps by alwang, on Flickr


stalk higher by alwang, on Flickr


heavy pawns by alwang, on Flickr


light creeping by alwang, on Flickr



plasticmotif
Registered: Sep 23, 2010
Total Posts: 931
Country: United States



Phidippus putnami



alan_m
Registered: Jun 21, 2012
Total Posts: 231
Country: N/A

Just picked up a few lenses in a Brussels flea market - MC Tele Rokkor 135/3.5, MC W.Rokkor 28/3.5, Minolta Variable Auto Teleplus 2x/3x + Tube (all in original faux-leather zipped cases!) + Vivitar (28xxxx Komine-made) 70-200/4 in FD mount. All glass dusty but flawless, after a haw/rub of my shirt - and all for a grand total of Euro 50.

Can't google any hard info on the 135/3.5 - all MC versions I've found are QF (very different looking lens), but mine looks almost identical, but not quite, to the MD version. Has built-in hood. Initial 135 shots, wide open or a half-stop down:


Bramble flower by specularist, on Flickr


Thistle by specularist, on Flickr

Maybe f5.6 or f8:


Thistle by specularist, on Flickr

Closed the hood & aimed upward toward sun for this, wide open, just to see how it coped (sky was mix of cloud and bright sun):


Wild flowers, grass by specularist, on Flickr

Bit of purple fringing to remove in pp, otherwise seems pretty good, if I can hold it steady! The Rokkor 28/3.5 and Vivitar both seem very sharp from initial snaps. I wonder how the tele-extender will work?



JimParsons
Registered: Jul 06, 2003
Total Posts: 217
Country: United States

Love that waterfall shot Highfive.



Jim Schemel
Registered: Oct 18, 2006
Total Posts: 4822
Country: United States

Nex 7 / Canon 28 FD
-Jim














sebboh
Registered: Nov 02, 2009
Total Posts: 10763
Country: United States

4 shots of a random building while walking to my car. pen f 42/1.2, all are wide open except #3 at f/5.6:





















LightShow
Registered: Aug 03, 2009
Total Posts: 5200
Country: Canada

sculptormic wrote:
This one is a 5 image stich at infinity. I tryed to stich them before doing PP on each photo individually.
You see a dark vertical line above the bush. I tryed to get rid of it but it was beyond my skills in ACR. Very annoying.







Almost looks like one of the exposures was lower then the others, maybe try another stitching program to rule out ACR.


Sehfehler
Registered: May 13, 2011
Total Posts: 8
Country: Sweden





























Jim Schemel
Registered: Oct 18, 2006
Total Posts: 4822
Country: United States

Sehfehler - nice set.The last one is my favorite.Not sure if you added the vignette or not, but it might look better if you devignetted it for an even exposure even on the edges.
-Jim



sculptormic
Registered: Feb 05, 2012
Total Posts: 1522
Country: Netherlands

LightShow wrote:
sculptormic wrote:
This one is a 5 image stich at infinity. I tryed to stich them before doing PP on each photo individually.
You see a dark vertical line above the bush. I tryed to get rid of it but it was beyond my skills in ACR. Very annoying.







Almost looks like one of the exposures was lower then the others, maybe try another stitching program to rule out ACR.


Well seen LightShow! Thanks!

I reworked the file, there were even three different exposures in there and I tryed to match them.
Did some more PP on the induvidual files up front now.
In Photomerge again because I do not have another stich program right now.
It looks a bit better now. Still margenta in the air.







alwang
Registered: Sep 02, 2011
Total Posts: 1050
Country: United States

More CV15:


dumpster flare by alwang, on Flickr


stacked rungs by alwang, on Flickr


unfilled by alwang, on Flickr


tutu by alwang, on Flickr



1       2       3              592      
593
       594              705       706       end