ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)
/forum/topic/860134/862

1       2       3              862      
863
       864              1078       1079       end

Picture This!
Registered: Aug 03, 2010
Total Posts: 2129
Country: United States

Martynas, great shot and processing to match !



rji2goleez
Registered: Jun 24, 2003
Total Posts: 6074
Country: United States

Grenache wrote:
If you still have it, the Contax 85 is great with IR. Really has profound 3D and limited or no hot spot up through f/8. If I recall, it picks up a little but manageable hot spot above f/8.

Jim


I was thinking exactly that when if I drag out the 20D . . . the Contax 85 would be a great lens to try. And yes, I most certainly still have it.



JaKo
Registered: Aug 08, 2011
Total Posts: 1762
Country: Canada

Diploneis, your PP truly adds to the experience. Could you please post larger size in HD thread?














user222
Registered: Sep 13, 2007
Total Posts: 817
Country: United States

ZE 1.4/35

another day by craig_coonrad, on Flickr

ZE 2/25

malheur wildlife refuge by craig_coonrad, on Flickr



Ronny Olsson
Registered: Jun 24, 2012
Total Posts: 4593
Country: Sweden

Great shot Craig and Jako

85 P @ f2.0

Carl Zeiss 1.4/85 ZF by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr



Ronny Olsson
Registered: Jun 24, 2012
Total Posts: 4593
Country: Sweden

85P @ f1.4

Carl Zeiss 1.4/85 ZF by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr



user222
Registered: Sep 13, 2007
Total Posts: 817
Country: United States

Ronny...super nice work with the 85. Great background, your daughter is lovely.



philber
Registered: May 21, 2008
Total Posts: 9121
Country: France

user222 wrote:
Ronny...super nice work with the 85. Great background, your daughter is lovely.


+1 !



darbo
Registered: Mar 10, 2012
Total Posts: 1028
Country: United States

I love the bug shots Ronny; very nice!

Head-shots of two sculptures:

1.4/35mm @ f/2:

Guardian by David Arbogast, on Flickr

21mm @ f/2.8 (and it really is a sculpture!):

A Blank Stare by David Arbogast, on Flickr



Ronny Olsson
Registered: Jun 24, 2012
Total Posts: 4593
Country: Sweden

Thanks guys



Rodluvan
Registered: Sep 01, 2010
Total Posts: 713
Country: Sweden

All 3 with 50MP







taran
Registered: Mar 02, 2012
Total Posts: 747
Country: United States

Some incredible work in this thread. Thank you all.



Grenache
Registered: Dec 18, 2008
Total Posts: 2154
Country: United States

Ronny, great portraits. Rodluvan, that last expression is fantastic. He looks like he is about to fall apart.

Couple color versions from the 15/2.8 ZE.
Jim


Standing Proud by Only_to_be_kind, on Flickr


Lake Effect by Only_to_be_kind, on Flickr



user222
Registered: Sep 13, 2007
Total Posts: 817
Country: United States

Nice works David, Rodluvan and Jim.

ZE 100MP


born in the sun by craig_coonrad, on Flickr


poppy hatch by craig_coonrad, on Flickr


foxglove by craig_coonrad, on Flickr


azalea by craig_coonrad, on Flickr



philber
Registered: May 21, 2008
Total Posts: 9121
Country: France

Great stuff, Craig!



Ronny Olsson
Registered: Jun 24, 2012
Total Posts: 4593
Country: Sweden

philber wrote:
Great stuff, Craig!

+1



canerino
Registered: May 28, 2005
Total Posts: 11074
Country: United States

Lee Saxon wrote:
That's some pretty bad Photoshop :/

Wonder why he lied about it.



A friend of mine directed me to this thread. Here I am...feel free to ask me any questions. No lies ever necessary on my end.



Ronny Olsson
Registered: Jun 24, 2012
Total Posts: 4593
Country: Sweden


Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 Vivitar Nikon AT-3/AI Extension Tube by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr

Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 ZF by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr



canerino
Registered: May 28, 2005
Total Posts: 11074
Country: United States

AlexDROP wrote:
The plane of focus must be reflected on the ground showing a narrow sharp line that is absent on the shot. Moreover the foreground is heavily patched and has some evident areas of recurring textures/patterns. And it's a little bit more than "blah,blah, blah... just levels honestly". No doubt he is lying. Though I don't have enough facts to state that the background picture and the boy shot were taken separately.



A friend directed me to this thread. Nice to meet you Alex. Sorry to say that you are wrong and I dont appreciate being called a liar. Feel free to ask me any questions you'd like.



canerino
Registered: May 28, 2005
Total Posts: 11074
Country: United States

Samuli Vahonen wrote:
kwoodard wrote:
Unless the guy is lying, its not a PS job... (but I agree, looks too good to be true)

He is lying, the kid has too big DOF. Dodging and burning explains why kid's shoes don't have vignetting as much as background. The amount of background blur doesn't look weird to me (before moving to Zeiss I shot a lot with 85/1.2mkII), but it won't make the image great - typical 85/1.2L image; cardboard people on blurry background - people don't have clear shape and volume, just damn flat cardboard figures - definitely not even slightest hint of 3D in these.



Samuli



Pleasure to meet you, Samuli. I'm sorry to tell you that you are wrong and that I am not lying. Feel free to ask me any questions you'd like.



1       2       3              862      
863
       864              1078       1079       end