|
saywhuut Registered: Jul 13, 2006 Total Posts: 141 Country: United States |
Hello, |
|
waterboiler Registered: Jun 15, 2005 Total Posts: 149 Country: Canada |
As a general purpose lens the 24-105L is very good. But as most 'jack of all trades', it is a middle of the pack at best. The zoom range is great but the f/4 is not really all that fast - meaning that the IS comes into play quite a bit. As well the f/4 makes low light shooting really iffy. At the wide end there is quite a bit of distortion. All that said, I have one and love it. |
|
ken.vs.ryu Registered: Apr 24, 2005 Total Posts: 2330 Country: N/A |
24-70 |
|
Dpic_arctic Registered: Nov 01, 2009 Total Posts: 2374 Country: United States |
I haven't heard much about it yet, but the 15-85mm IS might be an option if you're using APS-C. An option that is about as expensive as the 100-400mm L IS is the 16-35mm f/2.8L. It is one of the highest quality wide angle lenses that Canon makes. It is the choice of many Pros. |
|
Gary Gray Registered: Jan 06, 2008 Total Posts: 403 Country: United States |
I'd give some thought to the 28-300L. Very similar to size and in functionally to the 100-400L, but gives you a much broader range of applications. This way, you'd still have a little reach for occasional wildlife and achieve enough wide-angle and normal focal length for most everything else. |