|
kkennardis Registered: Jan 08, 2008 Total Posts: 309 Country: United States |
Went out the out local arboretum today and found once of these. Is this a Red Shoulder Hawk? ![]() Ken |
|
mark fadely Registered: Oct 09, 2005 Total Posts: 2658 Country: United States |
Nice shot Ken, and yes, I believe that is a Red Shoulder. |
|
Mr Zoom Registered: Jul 03, 2006 Total Posts: 7913 Country: United States |
That's a RSH for sure and quite a beautiful specimen. |
|
kkennardis Registered: Jan 08, 2008 Total Posts: 309 Country: United States |
I checked the web for the Red Shoulder and i could not find any exactly the same as this one. |
|
David Israel Registered: Nov 06, 2007 Total Posts: 1109 Country: United States |
Nice capture. I'm curious where the lens was relative to the RSH, as I don't see these guys close to the ground very often. Were you up off of ground level for this shot? Thanks, and congrats on the capture. |
|
kkennardis Registered: Jan 08, 2008 Total Posts: 309 Country: United States |
No i was on the Ground.when taking this shot. This Guy was up in a tree about 30 off hte ground. I was about 50 yards back using a EF 400mm /f/5.6L USM on a 40d body. |
|
David Israel Registered: Nov 06, 2007 Total Posts: 1109 Country: United States |
Hi Ken, I don't think that I have any relatives in Dayton. But I'm not much into geneology, so you never know. This was a good capture, given your vantage point. I'm finding myself tempted to get a 400 f/5.6. I do use a 100-400 on the 40, but have seen so many great shots from the 400/5.6 that I'm begining to think it would be worth the investment (as birds are my favorite subject and I can't afford a 500/4). |