Registered: Feb 23, 2004
Total Posts: 12080
Country: Canada
pmagrawal wrote:
How close were you to these birds...looks like art 60 mm u had to be really close...
60mm on a camcorder does not equal 60mm on a DSLR. 
|
Imagemaster Registered: Feb 23, 2004 Total Posts: 12080 Country: Canada |
Not great quality, but what do you expect from a camcorder? Video quality is excellent and great seeing it on the TV. Not much control over the stills, since it is recording video at the same time. |
|
Imagemaster Registered: Feb 23, 2004 Total Posts: 12080 Country: Canada |
#2 |
|
Imagemaster Registered: Feb 23, 2004 Total Posts: 12080 Country: Canada |
#3 |
|
Imagemaster Registered: Feb 23, 2004 Total Posts: 12080 Country: Canada |
#4 |
|
Imagemaster Registered: Feb 23, 2004 Total Posts: 12080 Country: Canada |
#5 |
|
pmagrawal Registered: Aug 02, 2006 Total Posts: 98 Country: United States |
How close were you to these birds...looks like art 60 mm u had to be really close... |
|
Cliftonyte Registered: Jan 28, 2004 Total Posts: 703 Country: United States |
#4 is really nice |
|
Imagemaster Registered: Feb 23, 2004 Total Posts: 12080 Country: Canada |
pmagrawal wrote: |
|
cbright Registered: Jan 30, 2005 Total Posts: 6256 Country: United States |
Wow, Tony. A different take on stills for sure. Why do I smell a JB in your future? |
|
PhotoHound Registered: Aug 26, 2004 Total Posts: 1562 Country: United States |
Interesting, thanks for sharing. Camcorder stills have slowly gotten better over the years; these are quite good for a combo-device. How munch control do you have over the settings (Av, Tv, M...)? |
|
photonutt Registered: Apr 02, 2005 Total Posts: 4906 Country: Canada |
Wow, surprising quality for a camcorder, must be fun watching it on the big screen |
|
SJMD Registered: Nov 13, 2004 Total Posts: 12424 Country: United States |
It shows you know how to use any camera. |
