Mustang Air to Air: The Sequel
/forum/topic/600984/4250

1       2       3              4250      
4251
       4252              4344       4345       end

JWilsonphoto
Registered: Jan 16, 2002
Total Posts: 16221
Country: United States

Hey, 22,000 looks from now we'll push through 5M. How about a hangar party, we'll get Garth to come and play!



Jan-Arie
Registered: Dec 24, 2005
Total Posts: 3613
Country: Netherlands



http://theaviationist.com/2014/07/29/typhoon-comics-selfie/ cant find maker of photo but it is a cool one



Jan-Arie
Registered: Dec 24, 2005
Total Posts: 3613
Country: Netherlands

JWilsonphoto wrote:
Hey, 22,000 looks from now we'll push through 5M. How about a hangar party, we'll get Garth to come and play!


A Party with Garth is always good



stevezzzz
Registered: Aug 01, 2010
Total Posts: 3430
Country: United States

JWilsonphoto wrote:
Hey, 22,000 looks from now we'll push through 5M. How about a hangar party, we'll get Garth to come and play!


You know I'd be there, Jim...and I'm not even a big country fan.



nrferguson
Registered: Apr 20, 2004
Total Posts: 1726
Country: United Kingdom

A couple of pages back, someone said they liked shots of aircraft taking off away from the camera - like this?



stevezzzz
Registered: Aug 01, 2010
Total Posts: 3430
Country: United States

Another view of the Pipistrel Sinus Flex over the Colorado Front Range foothills. This was before 9:00am: the thunderstorms are kicking up pretty good this afternoon.



NightOwl Cat
Registered: Feb 19, 2007
Total Posts: 7748
Country: United States

If you're considering the 14-24, you may want to browse through this thread if you're ready to buy:

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1292521

Right now it's only 9 pages long.

BillyBlaylock wrote:
Any of you Nikon shooters have any experience with the 16-35 f4 VR? I understand the distortion can be tough below 20mm but is otherwise a sharp lens (according to all those online reviewers). I am looking at this for interior architecture. The 24 PC-E is on the wish list as well but I am not sure I am ready for that one just yet


---------------------------------------------

ELinder wrote:
I'm trying to decide myself between that one and the 14-24mm f/2.8G. By all accounts it's sharp everywhere, but costs a lot more. I thought about the PC-E, but either one of the zooms would be much more versatile.

Erich




msalvetti
Registered: Dec 20, 2003
Total Posts: 2872
Country: United States

BillyBlaylock wrote:
Erich,
I have looked at the 14-24 as well and it is defiantly tough to decide between that and the 16-35!

Jim,
You can add prophet to your business card (just use small font)!
I am trying to rationalize away the thought that I should bite the bullet and get the purpose built architecture lens and you are not helping . I am not a professional photographer (unlike you and others in this thread) but like have designs to move that way in the near future. The fiscally responsible side says get something that can be used for multiple purposes and sold rather easily if need be. The aggressive, quit leaving yourself an escape route, don't ever compromise your integrity, perfectionist side says bite the bullet and buy the $2,000 PC-E lens or you will always wonder if it mattered!

Well this turned into a psychology lesson rather quickly! I guess if it were easy everyone would do it and be good at it. Your answer was immensely useful and not boring at all - the bad thing is I had a good idea what your answer would be and I asked anyway...

Thanks all.


Not to be the one to push you over the edge, but there is a 24 PC-E on B&S right now:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1298578

Mark



Colin Giersberg
Registered: Jun 01, 2008
Total Posts: 2105
Country: United States

Nikon may be coming out with a medium format camera.

http://petapixel.com/2014/07/29/rumor-nikon-planning-release-camera-featuring-sonys-50mp-medium-format-sensor/



ELinder
Registered: Feb 14, 2010
Total Posts: 511
Country: United States

Argh!, you people are making it far too easy to spend money on lenses!
Thanks for the opinions.
Erich



Aviationbuff
Registered: Apr 09, 2011
Total Posts: 545
Country: United States



BillyBlaylock
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Total Posts: 73
Country: United States

Thanks! I will check that one out.

msalvetti wrote:
BillyBlaylock wrote:
Erich,
I have looked at the 14-24 as well and it is defiantly tough to decide between that and the 16-35!

Jim,
You can add prophet to your business card (just use small font)!
I am trying to rationalize away the thought that I should bite the bullet and get the purpose built architecture lens and you are not helping . I am not a professional photographer (unlike you and others in this thread) but like have designs to move that way in the near future. The fiscally responsible side says get something that can be used for multiple purposes and sold rather easily if need be. The aggressive, quit leaving yourself an escape route, don't ever compromise your integrity, perfectionist side says bite the bullet and buy the $2,000 PC-E lens or you will always wonder if it mattered!

Well this turned into a psychology lesson rather quickly! I guess if it were easy everyone would do it and be good at it. Your answer was immensely useful and not boring at all - the bad thing is I had a good idea what your answer would be and I asked anyway...

Thanks all.


Not to be the one to push you over the edge, but there is a 24 PC-E on B&S right now:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1298578

Mark




BillyBlaylock
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Total Posts: 73
Country: United States

Cool images. Thanks for pointing that one out.

NightOwl Cat wrote:
If you're considering the 14-24, you may want to browse through this thread if you're ready to buy:

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1292521

Right now it's only 9 pages long.

BillyBlaylock wrote:
Any of you Nikon shooters have any experience with the 16-35 f4 VR? I understand the distortion can be tough below 20mm but is otherwise a sharp lens (according to all those online reviewers). I am looking at this for interior architecture. The 24 PC-E is on the wish list as well but I am not sure I am ready for that one just yet


---------------------------------------------

ELinder wrote:
I'm trying to decide myself between that one and the 14-24mm f/2.8G. By all accounts it's sharp everywhere, but costs a lot more. I thought about the PC-E, but either one of the zooms would be much more versatile.

Erich





stevezzzz
Registered: Aug 01, 2010
Total Posts: 3430
Country: United States

Stereo-X pair of the Boulder Valley Velodrome, nearing completion.



Aviationbuff
Registered: Apr 09, 2011
Total Posts: 545
Country: United States



JWilsonphoto
Registered: Jan 16, 2002
Total Posts: 16221
Country: United States

Tough on us both for sure Nick. I love every minute that I spend with each of them and they are all growing up so fast that it makes me realize how fleeting all of this is. I hope that Chandler's and my time together, and the myriad of experiences that we share will provide him with great memories, some life experience and confidence so he can better handle what life will inevitably throw at him down the line. Who knows, he might be the one that decides to pick up my cameras and carry on.



JWilsonphoto
Registered: Jan 16, 2002
Total Posts: 16221
Country: United States

One thing we aviation photographers don't have to stay up at night thinking about


http://www.infocushd.com/blogs/news/14473789-5-000-reward-for-the-return-of-360-heros-rig



JWilsonphoto
Registered: Jan 16, 2002
Total Posts: 16221
Country: United States

Canon underwhelms for a second year............



stevezzzz
Registered: Aug 01, 2010
Total Posts: 3430
Country: United States

An air quality study on the Colorado Front Range deploys a swarm of air assets and some world-class acronyms.

http://bit.ly/1tZSQtn



Wrei
Registered: Aug 01, 2008
Total Posts: 2242
Country: United States

Here's a goofy thought: Why don't they develop or use a non-polluting sensing platforms (balloons/electric drones?) to sample/test pollution levels instead of adding to the problem?



1       2       3              4250      
4251
       4252              4344       4345       end