|
ukphotographer Registered: Dec 12, 2009 Total Posts: 1231 Country: United Kingdom |
I fancy trying out a collapsible stand with a fixed lighting setup. |
|
kdphotography Registered: Dec 22, 2005 Total Posts: 1161 Country: United States |
I can't remember why, but I went with the Cheetah stand. It works well and holds up well, but I wouldn't suggest anything heavy. It's a "fast" stand and great to move around quickly without the legs getting in the way. I use the Cheetah stand with a Quantum Qflash, Turbo battery, and Pocket Wizard attached. |
|
Jim Cowsert Registered: Jul 10, 2003 Total Posts: 1755 Country: United States |
I have the C8 and fairly happy with it when I use it on solid ground. It's not as solid as my other cheaper lightstands with tubular style legs. I know you're a Qflash shooter and that's what I mount on mine too with their 27" octobox. Handles it OK but a little flimsy and not all that sturdy when I need to extend the height. |
|
ukphotographer Registered: Dec 12, 2009 Total Posts: 1231 Country: United Kingdom |
I've heard that the larger ones and 'heavier' ones (C12) are too much on the heavy side and that the centre column works like a fourth leg - so not so good on uneven surfaces because of it (?) |
|
ukphotographer Registered: Dec 12, 2009 Total Posts: 1231 Country: United Kingdom |
I just found this review Link which says the Denny, despite having round tubes on the legs also has plastic tube locks (I'm not fond of plastic tube locks) and in this case the tubes separated in use. It was a while back, but not good. |
|
kdphotography Registered: Dec 22, 2005 Total Posts: 1161 Country: United States |
I think that may have been one of the reasons for my going with the Cheetah. I use the lightweight stand only with the Qflash, but only with the standard reflector or barebulb. Jim points out correctly about difficulties when using larger small modifiers--it pushes the capability limits of the small stand, and as with any modifier can catch more wind. If I'm using larger modifiers, I'll simply opt for a heavier stand and weights. |
|
ukphotographer Registered: Dec 12, 2009 Total Posts: 1231 Country: United Kingdom |
I regularly use the Qpaq's on Nano stands, even with the 27" octobox without any issues, but the additional weight of the Qpaq and large battery might actually be a help there in ballasting the stand. |
|
cgardner Registered: Nov 18, 2002 Total Posts: 9307 Country: United States |
Indoor or outdoor use? |
|
ukphotographer Registered: Dec 12, 2009 Total Posts: 1231 Country: United Kingdom |
Everywhere use. I doubt it will suffice in every case, but the majority of cases would be OK. |
|
cgardner Registered: Nov 18, 2002 Total Posts: 9307 Country: United States |
Now I'm a bit confused. Ease of movement it the primary advantage of the auto retracting feet vs. conventional stand but the description it sounds like mostly static rather than "run and gun" like a wedding where you are constantly moving the OCF around to follow the action. ![]() It's got a small 28" footprint and is nearly un-tippable. If it gets bumped it just rolls away. It works a treat indoors if moving around with a flash on bracket and one OCF as I do with speedlights. I occasionally find one at thrift stores. Got the idea working for Zucker. It's what he used, but his had 4 legs and a cast iron base. |
|
dmward Registered: Apr 12, 2002 Total Posts: 1784 Country: United States |
The value of the Cheetah stand is its ability to collapse its legs when picked up. |
|
dmward Registered: Apr 12, 2002 Total Posts: 1784 Country: United States |
UK, |
|
ukphotographer Registered: Dec 12, 2009 Total Posts: 1231 Country: United Kingdom |
I'm constantly moving the lighting around to different locations as well as getting the equipment to the location in the first place. |
|
ukphotographer Registered: Dec 12, 2009 Total Posts: 1231 Country: United Kingdom |
dmward wrote: |
|
dmward Registered: Apr 12, 2002 Total Posts: 1784 Country: United States |
UK, |
|
ukphotographer Registered: Dec 12, 2009 Total Posts: 1231 Country: United Kingdom |
dmward wrote: |