I'm not in a hurry for a camera, but I really want a D600 (new preferably) and I missed out on the recent deal they had with the kit lens. Should I wait for another deal like that or am I going to be waiting for a long time?

Here ya go, took me 3 seconds to find one for ya here...at a great price
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1175261

trenchmonkey wrote:
Here ya go, took me 3 seconds to find one for ya here...at a great price
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1175261


its Will the personal shopper!! Monkey, I am looking for a new(used) car, watcha got??

newtophoto wrote:
I'm not in a hurry for a camera, but I really want a D600 (new preferably) and I missed out on the recent deal they had with the kit lens. Should I wait for another deal like that or am I going to be waiting for a long time?

There's no crystal ball but Nikon somehow manages to hold the line for pricing very well. The deep discount on the D600 package was a shock to many here, even with all the price speculation that commonly occurs. I would not expect anything similar until next Christmas. But, I'm not getting rich in the stock market either.

You ought to buy the one that Trenchmonkey points out above (although I don't like his payment requirements). That will be the seperated going rate for a bit... But the new ones offered for sale will get bought up fairly quick.

I thought about it and ended up buying a D600 "kit" at beyond the last minute on the 29th of December. Not sure what I'll do with the lens, but that's OK.

boshek wrote:
trenchmonkey wrote:
Here ya go, took me 3 seconds to find one for ya here...at a great price
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1175261


its Will the personal shopper!! Monkey, I am looking for a new(used) car, watcha got??


Who knows when the deal comes back? It was a very special deal due to dust/oil issue. When Nikon fixes that, they won't give the deal again. If you/OP want to buy new right now, just pay for the full price otherwise, get refurbished/ used-like-new. I think it's very simple and no argument needed.

No it wasn't. That's ridiculous to say. Any evidence to support that assertion?