|
snapsy Registered: Feb 24, 2008 Total Posts: 2328 Country: United States |
SNR performance nearly identical to 5DM3, High ISO DR materially better than 5DM3 (1/2 stop) and just a bit shy of the 1DX |
|
ben egbert Registered: Jan 31, 2005 Total Posts: 3760 Country: United States |
Looks like a good landscape and starscape camera. |
|
skibum5 Registered: Jan 21, 2005 Total Posts: 12991 Country: United States |
Wow they seem to have actually broken the 5D3 record for most color-blind ever! Much more color-blind than the D600 or 5D2 never mind 1Ds3 or some older cameras. Man they are taking the CFA color blindness awfully far.... |
|
skibum5 Registered: Jan 21, 2005 Total Posts: 12991 Country: United States |
snapsy wrote: |
|
skibum5 Registered: Jan 21, 2005 Total Posts: 12991 Country: United States |
DR is about the best Canon has ever done though, if not by much (but nothing like Exmor or even non-Exmor 1D4, not that I expected them to do it in the 6D). |
|
snapsy Registered: Feb 24, 2008 Total Posts: 2328 Country: United States |
skibum5 wrote: |
|
chez Registered: Nov 26, 2003 Total Posts: 5839 Country: Canada |
So basically tweaked 5D sensor technology? |
|
Geoff D F Registered: Nov 02, 2012 Total Posts: 37 Country: Australia |
chez wrote: |
|
sdeutscher Registered: Feb 19, 2004 Total Posts: 142 Country: N/A |
Geoff D F wrote: |
|
D. Diggler Registered: Dec 27, 2011 Total Posts: 2749 Country: United States |
skibum5 wrote: |
|
ben egbert Registered: Jan 31, 2005 Total Posts: 3760 Country: United States |
D. Diggler wrote: |
|
StillFingerz Registered: Jul 29, 2010 Total Posts: 2011 Country: United States |
Given the lateness of the 7D upgrade, perhaps the 6D is the last of the .25 fab process and subsequent bodies will be based on the new .18 fab...only time will tell, I'm thinkin 2014 might be an interesting year, maybe even an updated M with a viewfinder, faster AF |
|
thw2 Registered: Dec 27, 2004 Total Posts: 2479 Country: N/A |
StillFingerz wrote: |
|
eskimochaos Registered: Jun 16, 2011 Total Posts: 764 Country: United States |
Another poor Canon sensor. |
|
PeaktoPeek Registered: Dec 20, 2005 Total Posts: 1725 Country: United States |
eskimochaos wrote: |
|
Fred Miranda Registered: Dec 31, 2001 Total Posts: 15994 Country: United States |
"The EOS 6D offers a well-balanced performance across all three testing metrics, doing enough to put it into 10th place overall on the sensor rankings. Given the price, this does offer very good value for money, matched only by the Nikon D600. It suggests that this new market segment could be a real hotbed of key models for the major manufacturers and is therefore one to watch carefully" Read full measurements The Canon EOS 6D is now in stock: B&H Photo | Amazon.com | Adorama |
|
Gochugogi Registered: Jun 25, 2003 Total Posts: 8380 Country: United States |
The differences sure seem minor although I certainly wouldn't characterize this performance as poor, just not cutting edge for 2012. I wonder if the slight improvements in 6D DR and high ISO are more related to the CMOS having slightly larger [corrected!] pixels (fewer MP) rather than real advances in processing and sensor design? |
|
D. Diggler Registered: Dec 27, 2011 Total Posts: 2749 Country: United States |
Gochugogi wrote: |
|
curious80 Registered: Jun 18, 2010 Total Posts: 982 Country: United States |
With DxoMark it is much more informative to look at detailed graphs rather than the scores. Here is 6D against D800 and D3s: ![]() ![]() The SNR is pretty much identical and the differences are primarily in dynamic range. 6D has basically joined D3s as the high-ISO king and edges above the D800 at high ISO. At low ISOs of 100-400 the Sony sensor keeps its dynamic range advantage. Though at a DR of just over 12 EV at low ISOs, 6D is still excellent. I am a fan of Sony sensors with their great low ISO DR, but I don't know how many of those who are complaining about this sensor actually make use of 13 or 14 EV DR in their pictures. My Sony NEX-5N with 12 EV of DR already has so much room to pull out shadows that unless I am careful with my processing I can easily get my photos to start looking like HDRs. With 12 EV you are already getting into fairly deep shadows and the 13th and 14th stops are really really deep shadows - the range which most people will turn into black anyway. In reality I suspect that for most users the high ISO advantage has more practical value than the extra 2 stops of ultra-deep shadows. |
|
WAYCOOL Registered: May 15, 2004 Total Posts: 2313 Country: United States |
StillFingerz wrote: |