|
Bob Jarman Registered: Feb 04, 2007 Total Posts: 4754 Country: United States |
Not really happy with the original re-work, posting an alternative for your comparison and thoughts. Original had really bad artifacts if you look closely. |
|
ben egbert Registered: Jan 31, 2005 Total Posts: 3754 Country: United States |
As you know, I am not a fan of B&W, but I prefer the top one to the bottom. I don't care for the tone or the halo created around the head. |
|
AuntiPode Registered: Aug 05, 2008 Total Posts: 5886 Country: New Zealand |
Brightening the immediate surroundings dilutes the attention on the subject. |
|
Bob Jarman Registered: Feb 04, 2007 Total Posts: 4754 Country: United States |
Ben and Karen, |
|
AuntiPode Registered: Aug 05, 2008 Total Posts: 5886 Country: New Zealand |
You could select the hand, feather the edge and apply lens blur: |
|
oldrattler Registered: Aug 04, 2009 Total Posts: 3928 Country: United States |
I have a self-imposed rule of never reworking the image of a child... Therefore, I will say I prefer #1... The color cast on #2 is not-pleasing to my eye... For me the image is a great family portrait and should be left as such... |
|
AuntiPode Registered: Aug 05, 2008 Total Posts: 5886 Country: New Zealand |
When I was in the portrait biz, you'd be surprise how often the first question from the mother before I even started a shoot was "can you retouch ..." (fill in the blank). |
|
Bob Jarman Registered: Feb 04, 2007 Total Posts: 4754 Country: United States |
AuntiPode wrote: |
|
Bob Jarman Registered: Feb 04, 2007 Total Posts: 4754 Country: United States |
oldrattler wrote: |