|
analogg Registered: May 24, 2012 Total Posts: 15 Country: Portugal |
Sold last year... |
|
freaklikeme Registered: Apr 08, 2005 Total Posts: 4287 Country: United States |
sebboh wrote: |
|
sebboh Registered: Nov 02, 2009 Total Posts: 7018 Country: United States |
freaklikeme wrote: |
|
Jman13 Registered: May 02, 2005 Total Posts: 8018 Country: United States |
Well, I pulled my 1Ds Mark II out of the bag for the first time in six months, and decided to take some pictures of the kit that replaced it as sort of the 'last hurrah' for my 1Ds II. I've been meaning to sell it for some time, and unfortunately, in the year+ that I should have been selling it, I've lost a fair bit of value, but oh well. ![]() Micro 4/3 Primes: ![]() All lenses that I regularly use. This somewhat illustrates why I switched. The FD lens is the 50-300mm f/4.5L. It weighs 4 lbs 0.2 oz. So that one lens weighs 5.3 ounces less than all of the other lenses shown combined (4 lbs 5.5 oz). To compare to a full frame kit...all 9 of the AF lenses shown combined weigh almost exactly the same (12g difference) as the Canon 17-40L and 70-200/2.8L IS II together. ![]() And my AF only kit: ![]() |
|
sculptormic Registered: Feb 05, 2012 Total Posts: 436 Country: Netherlands |
You are very well covered in M4/3 gear! Nice! Only no Pana 21? |
|
Lee Saxon Registered: Jun 07, 2012 Total Posts: 466 Country: United States |
Rented for a comparison test. |
|
weezintrumpete Registered: May 18, 2005 Total Posts: 2173 Country: United States |
Not really alt, but... |