LR 4.2 Raw 7.2 vs DPP 3.11.31 rendered Detail
/forum/topic/1155660/0



DBotting
Registered: Jun 23, 2008
Total Posts: 38
Country: United Kingdom

I am finding for the first time that LR is producing more detail than DPP from CR2. It seems that Canon has been overtaken on their own Raw format.

Are others finding the same?

I am making sure everything is set to zero and the Adobe interpretation of the Canon standard shooting format used. There is quite a noticeable difference. Particularly at 200% where it makes the LR photo look like it was been shot with a sharper lens.

Well done Adobe.



DBotting
Registered: Jun 23, 2008
Total Posts: 38
Country: United Kingdom

Forget this. I had not zero'd all sharpening. Doh!

Two renderings very close now.

Sorry for wasting peoples time



abqnmusa
Registered: May 11, 2006
Total Posts: 2085
Country: United States

no, I find ACR still does not produce the clean conversions that DPP does.



wsheldon
Registered: Aug 05, 2009
Total Posts: 141
Country: United States

I haven't used DPP lately - how does it compare to the latest ACR and Lightroom 4 when it comes to noise control, defringing and lens corrections? I find those features of ACR/LR almost indispensable in cleaning up Canon 20D and 50D images at 800 ISO and removing purple fringing from chrome when using my 85/f1.8 wide open.