|
MikeW Registered: Dec 06, 2009 Total Posts: 1177 Country: Canada |
@ 204,800 iso. |
|
Alan321 Registered: Nov 07, 2005 Total Posts: 9222 Country: Australia |
When forced to use high ISO and if the scene allows it, try over-exposing the subject by a stop to greatly reduce the noise level. Just don't go so far that you lose highlights that you want to keep. I expect you might have lost little detail in the stones and tree trunk but gained a lot on the bear so long as it was not moving too fast and in the vegetation. |
|
Dan Bellyk Registered: Dec 24, 2007 Total Posts: 1699 Country: Canada |
ISO 204,800.....not much room for overexposing |
|
MikeW Registered: Dec 06, 2009 Total Posts: 1177 Country: Canada |
It was the last shot as he/she went bush. I wasn't taking the image to keep, I knew the iso was up there. |
|
ytwong Registered: Dec 29, 2003 Total Posts: 1077 Country: China |
If you have room to over-expose you don't need to use such high-iso to begin with |
|
MikeW Registered: Dec 06, 2009 Total Posts: 1177 Country: Canada |
F4 I believe, was at 5.6. I could have slowed the shutter down to lower the iso but last time I was at 200/s with the 300 F4 the images weren't as sharp as I hoped. |
|
MikeW Registered: Dec 06, 2009 Total Posts: 1177 Country: Canada |
|
|
Chris Court Registered: Dec 02, 2007 Total Posts: 203 Country: United States |
Regardless of whether alternative setting may have given a better result or not… ISO 204,800… WTF!!! How far we have come. |