|
Fred Miranda Registered: Dec 31, 2001 Total Posts: 16120 Country: United States |
"This is short, sweet, and simple. The resolution absolutely, positively kicks butt and takes names. It is way better than the lens it replaces. It’s better at 70mm than the best Canon zoom I know of, the 70-200 f/2.8 IS II. It’s even better at 24mm than the sharpest 24mm prime we have, the Canon 24 TS-E. In the center, in the corners, it doesn’t care. We only had 5 copies to test, but they were all very similar with little copy-to-copy variation." Read the entire test and Imatest results | See lens teardown. Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II Pre-order: B&H Photo | Amazon |
|
pixelpix Registered: Jul 19, 2002 Total Posts: 376 Country: Australia |
Canon is putting a lot of effort into lens updates that offer increased resolution across the frame... if I was a betting man, I would say this is in preparation for a new high resolution body.... Bring It On! |
|
RobDickinson Registered: Sep 25, 2009 Total Posts: 2784 Country: New Zealand |
I've seen comparison samples between the 24tse and this and this does seem better! |
|
Schlotkins Registered: Aug 06, 2004 Total Posts: 1965 Country: United States |
Those resolution numbers are really impressive. |
|
jcolwell Registered: Feb 10, 2005 Total Posts: 15157 Country: Canada |
Awesome. |
|
ben egbert Registered: Jan 31, 2005 Total Posts: 3847 Country: United States |
Wish he had said something about the corners, its why I shoot primes now. |
|
RobDickinson Registered: Sep 25, 2009 Total Posts: 2784 Country: New Zealand |
ben egbert wrote: |
|
tanglefoot47 Registered: Oct 12, 2004 Total Posts: 14736 Country: United States |
Damn fixed income |
|
surf monkey Registered: May 24, 2005 Total Posts: 2024 Country: United States |
Like many others, at first glance I thought, "How dare they charge this much for this lens?" |
|
Fred Miranda Registered: Dec 31, 2001 Total Posts: 16120 Country: United States |
Added the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II teardown link. |
|
danZphoto Registered: May 26, 2010 Total Posts: 4 Country: United States |
surf monkey wrote: |
|
ben egbert Registered: Jan 31, 2005 Total Posts: 3847 Country: United States |
RobDickinson wrote: |
|
StanOPhoto Registered: Sep 20, 2010 Total Posts: 339 Country: United States |
Those resolution numbers are insane. I notice a significant difference in sharpness between my 70-200 f/2.8 IS II and my 24-70 and I would love to have my 24-70 be just as sharp, but not at $1,000 more. I'd rather invest in a fast L prime for variety. |
|
gvg45 Registered: Oct 05, 2007 Total Posts: 1050 Country: United States |
Damn, I thought this lens wasn't going to be selling too well by the first initial reports causing a price decrease sooner than later, but with a review like this I dont see that happening anymore. |
|
splathrop Registered: Feb 27, 2006 Total Posts: 437 Country: United States |
I would welcome a comparison of true focal lengths at nominal 24mm and nominal 70mm. Would be good to have that data for the 70-200 II as well. |
|
snapsy Registered: Feb 24, 2008 Total Posts: 2405 Country: United States |
The Tamron sure looks competitive in terms of resolution, VC, and price. |
|
pipspeak Registered: Nov 23, 2004 Total Posts: 2189 Country: United States |
gvg45 wrote: |
|
SKumar25 Registered: May 18, 2006 Total Posts: 1548 Country: Australia |
The price will come down. This is the initial price, as with every other Canon product, the price comes down over time. Will not surprise me if Canon rebates this within 6-12 months. |
|
skibum5 Registered: Jan 21, 2005 Total Posts: 13150 Country: United States |
SKumar25 wrote: |
|
kewlcanon Registered: Mar 28, 2009 Total Posts: 4107 Country: United States |
The most expensive zoom too ? |