OM-D & PEN Images
/forum/topic/1127925/215

1       2       3              215      
216
       217              263       264       end

Jochenb
Registered: May 25, 2010
Total Posts: 1712
Country: Belgium

Nice shots people!

E-M5 + PL25:


Prego by Jochen-B, on Flickr



ariel777
Registered: Feb 12, 2009
Total Posts: 287
Country: United States

Excellent, String.....fascinating perspective.



mawz
Registered: Sep 11, 2005
Total Posts: 7499
Country: Canada

Wilbus wrote:
Gorgeous Mawz, it pops right out of my screen!


Thanks!



cputeq
Registered: Jun 25, 2008
Total Posts: 4643
Country: United States

Sky this evening.



carstenw
Registered: Dec 26, 2005
Total Posts: 15064
Country: Germany

Nice! Great caption too



mawz
Registered: Sep 11, 2005
Total Posts: 7499
Country: Canada


The Descent by Mawz, on Flickr
E-M5, ZD 14-54 II



juju1958
Registered: Apr 27, 2009
Total Posts: 663
Country: United Kingdom


BODMIN MOOR by JuliandeCourcy, on Flickr



dukenukem
Registered: Oct 04, 2012
Total Posts: 291
Country: Spain


Lasaña de Pollo y Beicon por _dUkEnUkEm_, en Flickr
OMD EM5 . Pana 12-35



carstenw
Registered: Dec 26, 2005
Total Posts: 15064
Country: Germany

Yum!



carstenw
Registered: Dec 26, 2005
Total Posts: 15064
Country: Germany

Fantastic shot, Julian! Makes me think of Arthur Conan Doyle et al.



juju1958
Registered: Apr 27, 2009
Total Posts: 663
Country: United Kingdom

carstenw wrote:
Fantastic shot, Julian! Makes me think of Arthur Conan Doyle et al.



Thank you and yes, it is after all the environment for many the occasional Daphne du Maurier's novel as well.



RickPerry
Registered: Mar 29, 2009
Total Posts: 581
Country: United States

Finally received my EM -1 with 12-40 and 75 1.8. I really like the feel of the camera - weight, size, build quality etc. Took it out for a spin at the boatyard and a few shots in the house. Very pleased with IQ, color and handling of the camera. Not too thrilled with the menu system but I am sure I will figure it out eventually.



RickPerry
Registered: Mar 29, 2009
Total Posts: 581
Country: United States

Oooops - looks like I loaded it in twice- sorry.



Kingfishphoto
Registered: Nov 26, 2005
Total Posts: 6782
Country: United States

Two sunrise shots from yesterday and two ho-hums from today.
Harry Palmer



cputeq
Registered: Jun 25, 2008
Total Posts: 4643
Country: United States

10-shot Pano this morning from my roof, JPEG mode Follow flickr links for the full-sized (58MP) version

Out the back yard - Full by J L Smith, on Flickr


I need to get myself a telephoto, but still unsure what to go for, as I'm seriously debating between the 35-100 and adapting the SWD 50-200. I have a feeling the SWD would be disappointed in AF speed, especially after using the 12-40.



httivals
Registered: May 08, 2004
Total Posts: 972
Country: United States

Re autofocus speed, I expect that the SWD 200 would be quite good. I am using the 150mm f2 and it is very good when using CAF (not tracking) and the 9 center points. Also using the focus limiter switches makes it that much better. No, you can't compare it to the speed of the 12-40mm (have that too), but it's very good. The 150mm f2 at least keeps up nicely at about 5 fps, and probably could do 6.5 fps with greater that 10 feet away using the focus limiter switch.

The 35-100mm I'm sure would be better for autofocus speed so if that's the range you need, I'd go for it.



cputeq
Registered: Jun 25, 2008
Total Posts: 4643
Country: United States

httivals wrote:
Re autofocus speed, I expect that the SWD 200 would be quite good. I am using the 150mm f2 and it is very good when using CAF (not tracking) and the 9 center points. Also using the focus limiter switches makes it that much better. No, you can't compare it to the speed of the 12-40mm (have that too), but it's very good. The 150mm f2 at least keeps up nicely at about 5 fps, and probably could do 6.5 fps with greater that 10 feet away using the focus limiter switch.

The 35-100mm I'm sure would be better for autofocus speed so if that's the range you need, I'd go for it.



Thanks for the info. Problem is, I have limited funds and I want them all

I owned the 50-200 SWD back when I had the E-5 and loved loved it, but I'm not sure how well it would handle compared to the 35-100, which seems tiny in comparison. I'd love the extra range, though, and I used to use it with a 1.4x TC with favorable results, also.

Me, being the idiot I am, didn't order the MMF3 and get the rebate, so if I go that route, I'll have to pick it up and actually pay for it.


Edit - Bah, I'll just go for the 35-100, as I know I'll get tired of the weight and bulk of the 50-200, as good as it may be.



bobbytan
Registered: Feb 03, 2004
Total Posts: 7418
Country: United States

Steve Huff picked the E-M1 as Camera of the Year … over the Sony a7r, Nikon Df, and Leica M240. Wow … that's quite an achievement for the E-M1.

http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2013/12/03/my-pick-for-camera-of-the-year-2013-the-olympus-om-d-e-m1/



juju1958
Registered: Apr 27, 2009
Total Posts: 663
Country: United Kingdom


MEVAGISSEY FEAST by JuliandeCourcy, on Flickr



THE VIEWERS by JuliandeCourcy, on Flickr



mawz
Registered: Sep 11, 2005
Total Posts: 7499
Country: Canada


The Evils of Caterpillars by Mawz, on Flickr
E-M5, m.Zuiko 12-50



1       2       3              215      
216
       217              263       264       end