|
Ho1972 Registered: Dec 02, 2007 Total Posts: 983 Country: United States |
Does anyone else find the 640 pixel maximum frustrating? I know we all have to play by the same rules, but such a small size seems so... last century. |
|
ericb67 Registered: Aug 03, 2011 Total Posts: 42 Country: United States |
I know exactly what you mean! I reshot my entry because it looked so different at 640 than it did full size. |
|
Travis Rhoads Registered: Apr 28, 2009 Total Posts: 2932 Country: United States |
Agreed, very nice b&w conversion. |
|
Ho1972 Registered: Dec 02, 2007 Total Posts: 983 Country: United States |
Thanks guys. I would like to have shown more of the chain that the weed was growing through, but doing that (at the aforementioned cursed 640 size) made the seed head too small and caused too much detail to be lost. |
|
mark fadely Registered: Oct 09, 2005 Total Posts: 6797 Country: United States |
Great shot, and yes, the 640px is a restriction for sure. I also like the B&W presentation of this. I don't immediately get a sense of Urban. |
|
Ho1972 Registered: Dec 02, 2007 Total Posts: 983 Country: United States |
mark fadely wrote: |
|
Oregon Gal Registered: Nov 02, 2008 Total Posts: 1360 Country: United States |
The image restriction of 640 px can be an obstacle but with that said I like your B/W image over the color version. |