|
tom lozinski Registered: Jul 14, 2011 Total Posts: 78 Country: United States |
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/manasquantom/6580975079/" title="Manasquan Reservoir under the stars4 by lozinskitom, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7026/6580975079_e6e0dfba37_o.jpg" width="1600" height="1060" alt="Manasquan Reservoir under the stars4"></a> |
|
tom lozinski Registered: Jul 14, 2011 Total Posts: 78 Country: United States |
Trying the BBC code instead of the HTML code. Not sure what bbc stands for but I'll give it a shot. Looked for a sticky giving instructions, I'll look a little more if this doesn't work. |
|
cgardner Registered: Nov 18, 2002 Total Posts: 9301 Country: United States |
I find the brighter foreground object and trees compete too much with the sky making them the stronger focal point, when the sky and stars is more interesting. Do you have any shots where less foreground lighting (or none) was used for comparison? |
|
RustyBug Registered: Feb 02, 2009 Total Posts: 9388 Country: United States |
Tried to balance the sky vs. foreground a bit with some selective edits... removed the distraction of the horizon lights and your watermark (unfortunately killed some reflection detail also). |
|
sbeme Registered: Dec 23, 2003 Total Posts: 14810 Country: United States |
Could you repost or post an additional version with long edge 800-1000? Too big to see on most monitors without scrolling. |
|
tom lozinski Registered: Jul 14, 2011 Total Posts: 78 Country: United States |
Here is a version without the foreground lit (the midground is still lit.) I guess I could average the two. I tried averaging the two but the problem is that the floating tree stump is moving and doesn't line up easily. Thanks for the comments, I did darken the horizon lights a bit. |
|
RustyBug Registered: Feb 02, 2009 Total Posts: 9388 Country: United States |
Duplicate layers, then selective adjust/delete/blend to taste. |