|
ssc45 Registered: Jul 18, 2010 Total Posts: 361 Country: United States |
I had enabled the safety shift on my 1dm3 for AV/TV. I had done this some months back and forgot. On my 40D I had auto ISO, which was OK, and used it a few times. The 1dm3 doesn't have auto ISO, but you can set the SS for ISO. So I am shooting the pipeline masters surfing competition here in Hawaii and take 1300 pictures the first day and when I get back to review them, many of the pics are OOF. I had set the camera to TV at 1250 and ISO to 200 and took a few test shots and got the ap at f8. However, in the changing light and conditions, the SS had lowered the speed down to 500 for some pictures. Also, the camera ran a bit sluggish and I do not know how to better say it. Just seemed slower. |
|
EB-1 Registered: Jan 09, 2003 Total Posts: 20296 Country: United States |
Aren't you looking through the camera and seeing the exposure settings in real time, or is it a remote rig? Manual exposure does not work for you? |
|
Fr3d Registered: Nov 29, 2008 Total Posts: 290 Country: Germany |
I hate safety shift, it bites me every time when I forgot that I enabled it. |
|
Richard Nye Registered: May 30, 2007 Total Posts: 2251 Country: United States |
I've got my 1D4 and 1Ds3 set up so I can download the camera settings from the SD card (I have a set of settings for surfing). That way I'm less likely to do something boneheaded. |
|
stanj Registered: Aug 05, 2003 Total Posts: 9362 Country: United States |
I have been using SS since the T90 days and love it. Just think about it, what would have happened in your case had you just turned it off? You would be shooting at Tv 1250 and eventually would have ended up with underexposed shots once you had reached the maximum aperture - just like with SS on. Would that have been better? The ISO 200 would have been too slow either way, with or without SS. The problem is you forgot to bump the ISO, not that you forgot to turn off SS. |
|
ssc45 Registered: Jul 18, 2010 Total Posts: 361 Country: United States |
Hi all. Surfing is exciting to me and I prefer to use TV. When using manual, I have more exposure issues. We have gone from dark skys, clouds, rain, blue sky and bright sunshine in as many minutes. Plus, when a surfer clears a wave and has nothing but sky behind him vs dropping into a dark pipe or coming out of a dark wave into a sea of white foam, I have had better luck with TV. Also, I am enjoying the action and don't concentrate on my settings in the viewfinder as much as tracking the surfer and anticipating his next move. So, as FR said, it bit me and as I stated, I made a stupid mistake. Further, I had no reason to check the speed because I forgot about the SS. I was checking the histogram. And yes it would have been better for me to have had underexposed shots as I would have noticed that in the histogram. I would have preferred underexposed sharp images vs proper exposed OOF shots, if those were the only choices. Frankly, I prefer properly exposed sharp pics |
|
jcolwell Registered: Feb 10, 2005 Total Posts: 15134 Country: Canada |
mumble, mumble... |
|
BrianO Registered: Aug 21, 2008 Total Posts: 7915 Country: United States |
ssc45 wrote: ...I would have preferred underexposed sharp images vs proper exposed OOF shots, if those were the only choices. |
|
Ferrophot Registered: Jun 11, 2010 Total Posts: 252 Country: Australia |
There was a time when most of my FPTs (Finger Put Throughs) were caused by deficiencies in the equipment, mostly shooting action in low light with 100 ASA slide film. I seem to get the same number of Ds (Deletes) now but nearly all of these are my fault because I've forgotten some previous setting or the control dial has turned halfway between settings all by itself. Ahhhh! the joys of photography. |
|
jcolwell Registered: Feb 10, 2005 Total Posts: 15134 Country: Canada |
Ferrophot wrote: |
|
ssc45 Registered: Jul 18, 2010 Total Posts: 361 Country: United States |
Brian, you are correct. I did not express myself correctly. Thanks for the clarification. And yes, I have learned over the years that most issues are my fault and not the equipment. I do know what you all mean about shooting exciting situations. Got into a bit of a scrape with a black rhino in Zim and all my pics were underexposed. |
|
BrianO Registered: Aug 21, 2008 Total Posts: 7915 Country: United States |
ssc45 wrote: ...Got into a bit of a scrape with a black rhino in Zim and all my pics were underexposed. |
|
BennyR Registered: Aug 08, 2006 Total Posts: 1391 Country: United States |
First thing I do when I get a new camera is enable SS. I'd rather get a shot outside of the preferred setting than get a badly mis-exposed shot. |
|
ssc45 Registered: Jul 18, 2010 Total Posts: 361 Country: United States |
Had three too close encounters with Black Rhino, but it is the too close encounters with snakes that cause me to run, screaming like a little girl. |
|
Beni Registered: May 31, 2005 Total Posts: 7700 Country: United Kingdom |
I don't have SS for iso on my 5D but love it there, I'm a wide open shooter and often it will save me when the sun comes out, shooting at f2.8 rather than f1.8 is better than blowing out by two stops! |
|
Scott Stoness Registered: Sep 11, 2006 Total Posts: 8947 Country: Canada |
I don't like shutter priority or safety shift for that reason. In the heat of the moment you get surprises. I have been burned on wolves that are almost a once in the lifetime event by shutter priority underexposing. |
|
Ian.Dobinson Registered: Feb 18, 2007 Total Posts: 10404 Country: United Kingdom |
Ok this is slightly off topic but since you mentioned it |
|
BrianO Registered: Aug 21, 2008 Total Posts: 7915 Country: United States |
Scott Stoness wrote: ... I have been burned...by shutter priority underexposing. Aperture priority...or manual is the answer. |
|
Scott Stoness Registered: Sep 11, 2006 Total Posts: 8947 Country: Canada |
BrianO wrote: |