Upload & Sell: Off
| Re: EF 16-35 4L IS || |
Interesting. Seems Canon is filling out it's parallel lines of fixed-aperture L zooms -- one f/2.8 and one f/4.
If the corner performance of the 16-35 f/4 is the same or better than the f/2.8 II version then count me in, especially if it's also cheaper. The 16-35 f/2.8 is good at f/4, but IS would be of more use to me at these focal lengths than speed. I'm less interested in a 14-24 because chances are it'll have a bulging front element (a pain for filters) and I've never really wanted to go wider than 16mm.