Upload & Sell: Off
| Re: The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2 |
Ian Boys wrote:
I honestly can't see why one would do this instead of the equally good 180/2.8. You can carry them, handhold them etc and they're far cheaper and I doubt anyone of us could tell the difference in a shot.
If you honestly believe that there's no difference, then consider yourself very, very lucky. Move on with the 180 2.8, save $4K and live happily ever after. Unfortunately for me, I can recognize a 200 f/2 shot from a mile away