Home · Register · Join Upload & Sell

  

  Previous versions of StillFingerz's message #11792004 « Canon 300mm f/2.8 vs f/4? »

  

StillFingerz
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Canon 300mm f/2.8 vs f/4?


A Vette\'s backside, hand-held, 40D, 300 f4L IS...the IS does help this aging, shaky cripple
The f4L is great with extension tubes as well as T/C\'s; the Mark III T/C\'s are a bit sharper and faster AF wise.
I\'m glad Canon makes these slower, lighter \'L\' teles...am looking forward to their using the 400 f5.6L.



Sep 07, 2013 at 06:09 PM
StillFingerz
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Canon 300mm f/2.8 vs f/4?


A Vette\'s backside, hand-held, 40D, 300 f4L IS...the IS does help this aging, shaky cripple
The f4L is great with extension tubes as well as T/C\'s; the Mark III T/C\'s are a bit sharper and faster AF wise. I\'m glad Canon makes these slower, lighter \'L\' teles...



Sep 07, 2013 at 06:07 PM
StillFingerz
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Canon 300mm f/2.8 vs f/4?


A Vette\'s backside, hand-held, 40D, 300 f4L IS...the IS does help this aging, shaky cripple


Sep 07, 2013 at 06:00 PM





  Previous versions of StillFingerz's message #11792004 « Canon 300mm f/2.8 vs f/4? »

 




This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.