Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

My posts · My subscriptions
  

  Previous versions of RustyBug's message #11087580 « silly inverse square law question. »

  

RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: silly inverse square law question.


curious80 wrote:
Man you have to read the whole thing.


Trust me ... I did, several times.

As to the white square / black wall ... I'm still trying to figure out how both you and Neil Armstrong can take a picture of the moon in accordance with your theory regarding ISL @ camera to subject distance.

Let's see, Neil is shooting from 5 feet away ... we are shooting from (238,900 x 5,280) 1,261,392,000 feet away.

By my calculations 2^30.25 = 1,276,901,417 ... suggesting that the illumination falling on Neils camera would be 30 stops brighter than that which falls on ours.



Nov 02, 2012 at 11:45 PM
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
Re: silly inverse square law question.


curious80 wrote:
Man you have to read the whole thing.


Trust me ... I did, several times.

As to the white square / black wall ... I'm still trying to figure out how both you and Neil Armstrong can take a picture of the moon in accordance with your theory regarding ISL @ camera to subject distance.

Let's see, Neil is shooting from 5 feet away ... we are shooting from (238,900 x 5,280) 1,261,392,000 feet away.



Nov 02, 2012 at 11:26 PM



  Previous versions of RustyBug's message #11087580 « silly inverse square law question. »