Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

My posts · My subscriptions
  

  Previous versions of StarNut's message #11001318 « Your choice of body for wildlife? »

  

StarNut
Online
Upload & Sell: On
Re: Your choice of body for wildlife?


OntheRez wrote:
Also, I'd advise against worrying about "reach." Some people - in defiance of the basic laws of physics - insist that you can get more picture from less sensor.

Robert


, indeed.

To use "the basic laws of physics" to try to refute the notion that a denser pixel array, all else being equal, results in greater resolution, is, uh, ironic.

When my 5D3 is significantly reach limited, so that the critter will also not come close to filling up the sensor of my 7D (using the same lens), I will, every time (assuming decent light; absent decent light, I don't bother trying), get a better, more detailed photo using my 7D than using my 5D3.

One might even say that any contrary assertion would be in defiance of the basic laws of physics....



Sep 28, 2012 at 08:55 PM



  Previous versions of StarNut's message #11001318 « Your choice of body for wildlife? »