Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

My posts · My subscriptions
  

  Previous versions of michaelwatkins's message #10453021 « Planar vs. Sonnar vs. Planar »

  

michaelwatkins
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Planar vs. Sonnar vs. Planar


I'm more than passively interested in this subject so have been looking around this evening for example images from both ZM50 variants.

Here's some images (including a few from posters here) on ZeissImages.com:

ZM 50mm f/2 Planar
http://zeissimages.com/standardgallery.php?lenstype=321&showall

ZM 50mm f/1.5 C Sonnar
http://zeissimages.com/standardgallery.php?lenstype=322&showall

EDIT, examples from other sites:

Street portraits, India; this person's blog contains quite a few shots with the ZM50/2 albeit on a M9 so the depth of field difference at any given aperture will be... different. Here's one post containing a few with the ZM 50/2 Planar:
http://www.hendralauw.com/2011/09/waiting-for-customers/

Flickr groups, 50/2 Planar:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/zeissikon50mm/
http://www.flickr.com/groups/86731438@N00/pool/tags/ZeissPlanar50mmf2.0

Flickr group, 50/1.5 Sonnar
http://www.flickr.com/groups/zeissikon50mm-c/

Decisions, decisions.



Mar 19, 2012 at 01:16 AM



  Previous versions of michaelwatkins's message #10453021 « Planar vs. Sonnar vs. Planar »