Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2010 · Tamron 200-500 & Canon 100-400
  
 
Imagemaster
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · Tamron 200-500 & Canon 100-400


Here are a few quick comparison shots with the Canon 100-400.
7D mounted on tripod, mirror lock-up, self-timer shutter release, all at exactly same distance, manual focus, from jpegs (with in-camera sharpening the same for all images).

If you want a better or more accurate test, you will have to ask someone else to do it. This was just for my curiosity.


Image 494186 not found



Image 494187 not found



Image 494188 not found





Dec 17, 2010 at 04:06 AM
Aaron D
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · p.1 #2 · Tamron 200-500 & Canon 100-400


Huh. Tamron doesn't look half bad to me. How's it look at the shorter end?

**EDIT**
Just read your review. I take it you never got the focusing mechanism fixed and use it strictly as MF?



Dec 17, 2010 at 06:38 AM
Imagemaster
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · Tamron 200-500 & Canon 100-400


Aaron D wrote:
Just read your review. I take it you never got the focusing mechanism fixed and use it strictly as MF?


You are assuming this is the same lens, which it is not. I had the other one repaired (not under warranty) for about $300, then sold it.

My comments on the new one are pretty well the same. The only advantages the Tamron has over the Canon are: cheaper, lighter, and 100mm more reach.

Tamron AF sucks compared to the Canon and lack of focus-limiter is stupid.



Dec 17, 2010 at 10:35 PM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



jcolwell
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · Tamron 200-500 & Canon 100-400


Plus, the Canon IS probably comes in handy when you forget to use a tripod.


Dec 17, 2010 at 11:12 PM
Techuser
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · p.1 #5 · Tamron 200-500 & Canon 100-400


For the price the tamron is a good lens
I would go for it just for the lack of stabilization

If I shot in sunny conditions it would be an option of upgrade for my 70-300 IS



Dec 18, 2010 at 12:38 AM
Aaron D
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · p.1 #6 · Tamron 200-500 & Canon 100-400


Imagemaster wrote:
You are assuming this is the same lens, which it is not. I had the other one repaired (not under warranty) for about $300, then sold it.

My comments on the new one are pretty well the same. The only advantages the Tamron has over the Canon are: cheaper, lighter, and 100mm more reach.

Tamron AF sucks compared to the Canon and lack of focus-limiter is stupid.

Indeed, I made the mistake of assuming. I forgot how quickly many seem to rotate their stock of gears here. Yes, gears.






Dec 18, 2010 at 07:45 PM





FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Reset password