Upload & Sell: Off
There is often something interesting going on in fb101's pictures on a symbolic level, he seems to apply a sculptor's sense of three dimensional space to some of his pictures, and they generally have a gritty-though-polished feel to them that I find appealing. Besides, they have naked chicks in them. So I consider it art with naked women (some nude, some uninhibitedly naked), who admittedly could sometimes use a hamburger...
Regarding that comment by Mulgrew re: anorexia, I am constantly astonished at the close-minded attitudes of people here. Similarly, in merirem's threads people constantly rag on her photos and model with the upper lip stud, though she shows more style and talent than many here (granting that almost everyone here is above my level of talent). What, can't one take a picture of a thin woman these days? Is it off limits to take an honest, stylish picture of a woman with embedded jewelry-- is that subject now off limits photographically? Maybe the intent of the pictures you're looking at is not to titillate you erotically, or even to present an image of a woman in a way that most would find most pretty-- ever think of that?
If I shot nudes, personally, I would seek at least some of the time to escape from the tyranny of the semi-erotic nude. One must be able to take a photograph of a woman or man from other than the model's "best" angles, our sense of which is really driven at bottom by biological impulses and cultural stereotypes and memes. How could one ever discover something new of interest if one stuck to the same old poses and settings?
And fb101 does post on others' threads here. I don't think you should smear someone if you don't know what you're talking about.