James Markus Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
rafaelcasd wrote:
I have both in AIS guise, at f/2.0 to my eyes: the 35 1.4 has flatter field and is sharper at longer distances, the 35 2 is better at short distances, and shows less aberration on bright lights. Both are good lenses at 2.0. from 2.8 on the 1.4 is better, more even performance across the frame. If price is a consideration I would get the 2.0. If 1.4 is wanted, the 1.4 is a competent performer at full aprrture as long as no lights are in the frame. Here is a comparison for landscape, similar photo at f2 on both lenses.
These are full size on flickr
Thanks for the comparison. I've bid on 6 Nikkor 35mm f1.4s over the last few months. I'm not a low baller, but the lens seems to attract snipers - of which I am one. I almost always win auctions this way, but not with the f1.4. The price seems overly inflated in my opinion. I Enjoyed these photos of yours, Rafael...




|