LeadyGonzales Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
few years ago i made a comparison on one day with 5D Mark II
here these shots (also posted in this forum):
|
|
|
|
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5078/5896865195_e4d2100d96_b.jpg |
|
|
|
|
58mm
|
|
|
|
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6060/5896865355_988a415c90_b.jpg |
|
|
|
|
50mm
|
|
|
|
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5075/5897431724_28948d5112_b.jpg |
|
|
|
|
58mm
|
|
|
|
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5079/5897431866_346e56b554_b.jpg |
|
|
|
|
50mm
|
|
|
|
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5310/5897432194_40483c0d84_b.jpg |
|
|
|
|
58mm
|
|
|
|
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5077/5897432016_94cddfecb0_b.jpg |
|
|
|
|
50mm
|
|
|
|
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5068/5897431164_a7fe67a65a_b.jpg |
|
|
|
|
58mm
|
|
|
|
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5262/5897431350_ed07fe10bc_b.jpg |
|
|
|
|
50mm
there the difference between 50 and 58 are not so huge ..
but this year i noticed, that on NEX + speed booster I do not like the 50mm 1.2 - up to now i do not understand, why. it is somehow not sharp in the corners, has strong vignetting (ugly, only in the very corners) .. don't know, need to test.
However, in my opinion the 58mm is the king !
(see sebbohs shots)
-L.
|