edwardkaraa Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
I'm generally not a fan of Leica rendering, except their recent designs that try to emulate the Zeiss look, very successfully I have to admit.
But if you're really keen on the Lux, I think that absolutely you won't need the CV 50 and 75 (the latter is a weak lens anyway). You will probably end up getting the 35 Lux or the 28 Cron, once you start getting into Leica glass, so selling the CV 35 and 28 will only accelerate the process
KatieInTexas wrote:
Okay, tell me what you think guys. I've gone through my over-stocked inventory of lenses and think that it's time for a sell-off so that I can fund the 50 lux asph.
If I sell:
CV 28 1.9
CV 35 1.2
CV 50 1.5
CV 75 1.8
AND an entire stocked bin of MF film along with *maybe* my Bronica ETRS with 3 PE lenses (50, 75 and 105)
I should come close to being okay with getting the 50 lux asph.
I would be keeping my CV 21 1.8 and my 25mm (to use on the R4A) and already have 35mm covered by Fuji (x100). From what I've read and seen, the 50 lux is an almost necessity and I wouldn't miss the 50 or the 75 CV lenses. I'm iffy on the 35, as I really like that lens, but suppose I could purchase another 35 down the road if I wanted to. This lets me continue to shoot film in 35mm format (for which I have the R4A, two minoltas, an underwater Nikonos and tons of odd point and shoots). I haven't shot MF film in quite some time, and never really preferred it much over 35mm anyway...
What would you do? ...Show more →
|