fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | General Gear-talk | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
  

Archive 2010 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review

  
 
Sam tran
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review


I am one of those "vintage" folks, and one thing is concerned me about this type of trap-bag is for a long distant walk, it will weight like a ton on one shoulder, thus I would never go back to this design, instead buy one of the Kata's bag that allowed me to switch between a backpack (for long distant carry) and convert to swing bag (by remove one of the traps when I arrived at location) -which is easy to get my gear in & out. I gave up & sold the 6-millions bag for this reason.

Just my 02 cents.



Jun 03, 2010 at 08:23 PM
tanglefoot47
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review


chaddoyon wrote:
Does anyone know how this line compares to the TT Urban Disguise line? I love my UD40!

-Chad


I would take this one in a heart beat over a UD40



Jun 03, 2010 at 10:40 PM
Savas K
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review


Jim Levitt wrote:
The only thing that worries me about these ThinkTank bags is the lack of end pockets for the oddball "stuff" that needs to be along on a shoot: blower brush, other lens cleaning items, pen/pad, cable release, spare battery, etc. This is something I really like about the Domke bags. Are there inside pockets on the Retrospective line for these sorts of items? Having to add another bag on the end kinda defeats the sleek design of the bag.


There are places that sell zippered organizers with see through mesh that can handle the small stuff with a bag like the Retrospective. The organizers come in different sizes to suit. You give up a portion of interior space to accommodate the organizer.

Depicted are organizers I had on hand from computers bags long ago. I forget the make. The formerly useless pockets in my Tenba Messenger are now useful due to these mini-bags. The Tenba's upright slot pockets are too slim to get your hand into and things would be hard to find otherwise if you dropped stuff into them.

http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w134/_Savas/IMG_0537.jpg


http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w134/_Savas/IMG_0538.jpg


http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w134/_Savas/IMG_0539.jpg



Jun 06, 2010 at 08:49 AM
deepbluejh
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #4 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review


Just reviving this thread to see if anyone else has this bag. Comments on it? How well does it handle multiple camera bodies? Also, any comments on stacking lenses inside the bag? It would seem like it might scratch up the barrels of the lenses.


Oct 13, 2010 at 11:52 AM
kennedyma
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review


hfgarris wrote:
I also like the mounting straps on the ends of the bag which can be used for hanging small TT modular bags from their modular belt line. This allows expansion for another lens, flash, or small "stuff" bag when you need it. I like to put my "support gear" such as chargers, card readers, cables, etc. in a separate bag that I can easily remove and leave in the room or car when I am out walking around shooting. It is nice not carrying the extra weight, and it keeps it all together so nothing gets lost or left behind.

-howard


This is one of the main reasons I'm glad I got the 20. I already have 3 lens changer 35s that I us on the speed belt. Now I can just attach one or two of them to the bag an bam I got a bigger bag, if needed. Also I can use the bag to carry a ton of stuff and then pop off the 35s and the bag now becomes a day bag.

A+++ for all ThinkTank products.



Oct 13, 2010 at 09:47 PM
treacle
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #6 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review


I just got the Think Tank Retrospective 20 in pinestone. I've always been a TT fan. I've been using a UD40 and airport international for years. I may get the Retrospective 30 for when I need to carry 2 bodies but I usually don't like to shoulder that much gear so I'm thinking about it. I like to keep my lenses wrapped in something like Billingham Simplies or other lens pouches that are neoprene or lightly padded.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=billingham+lens&ci=15493&N=4291645577

Another option is the lens changer version of these bags that have slots for lenses but to place for a body.



Oct 13, 2010 at 10:00 PM
carstenw
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #7 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review


I have both the Retrospective 30 and the Tenba Large Messenger bags, and I by far prefer the Tenba. The Retrospective holds a lot, but the dividers cannot be attached to the bottom, and are not that tall either, and the shapes are just funny. The dividers are also rather weak, so placing a camera on top as in the first shot, makes it press down on all the lenses inside. I am always afraid that I'll get some pointless scratch on something from things rubbing together in the wrong way. My D3 is just a little too tall, so the prism pushes out the front of the bag a bit, and the only way I can stop this bag from becoming truly fat is to not use the two huge front pockets. The interior side pockets bulge in and get in the way when you don't use them. I keep a magazine and my iPad in the rear pocket, and even with just a couple of lenses in the bag, the fit is so tight that my iPad is showing rubbing marks on the screen, even though I have it in a leather protective case. When my D3 is in the bag, lens down, the hotshoe catches the edge of the interior front compartment, so the best thing I can do is not to use that, and zip it closed. The strap has metal buckles in exactly the places where a camera hangs, should I be silly enough to try carrying my camera outside the bag. All in all, I am just hugely disappointed in this bag. Every compartment is either too tight or too loose. Good bag, but certainly not great and I will replace it in a heartbeat when I find something better. The only satisfactory use I have found for it is to take my D3 with 200VR mounted. It is a squeeze, and nothing else will fit, but it works.

Note that I am not saying that anyone else is wrong about this bag, just giving an alternate opinion. Probably it is just a terrible bag for a pro camera and a great bag with a D700 and down.

Sadly the Tenba is not quite thick enough to take my D3 with a lens on, otherwise I would never have bought the TT. The Tenba is the exact opposite. The dividers are deep and attach at all the important places, earning my full trust. The size is much better, thinner but longer, and fits my MF kit or my LF kit with exactly the right shapes everywhere. I have considered switching my D3 to a D700, just to be able to use that bag again. The thin pockets mentioned above are great for things like an X-Rite Passport and other thin items. You would not want to put small items in there, as mentioned. I wish Tenba would make another bag, slightly thicker, to take a D3-size camera with lens on.



Jan 29, 2011 at 02:16 PM
passthegravy
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #8 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review


Carsten, is the Tenba bag noticeably lighter than the TT? I keep hearing that the TT bags are very well made, but are heavy even when empty.


Jan 29, 2011 at 03:10 PM
carstenw
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #9 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review


No, they are about the same. The TT weighs about 1350g without any dividers (carrying the 200/2 on D3), and the Tenba about 1550g with the full internal compartment and 2 dividers.

I need to make a small correction to my post above: the internal front compartment in the TT is not zippered, but has a velcro flap in the middle. Inside this compartment are numerous small pockets, but because the D3 is so fat, they are all useless, because you don't have enough space to open up and look in, unless you remove the camera, so I find myself just throwing stuff in and finding it again by feel. The internal rear compartment is zippered, and this is the one I usually leave closed, because the rubber on the base of the D3 catches it all the time. There are also small "ear" flaps on each of the four corners, which make it harder to get stuff in and out, for no tangible benefit that I can see. Argh.

The Tenba also has metal buckles on the strap, btw, one of the few flaws in that bag. And it has D-rings on the bag for the straps, which don't stay in their position, but rotate...

What is up with these companies? There should be something soft to cover all metal parts. I am not made of money, and do turn gear over from time to time, so scratches on my lenses and bodies cost me money for no gain.

P.S. my rant sounds a bit unfocused. I should really get my act together and make some photos to demonstrate my points. Let's see...

P.P.S. I should add that it looks like the TT does a lot better with a bunch of small lenses with no hoods. This doesn't help me much, because my most used lenses are long, fat or awkwardly shaped, and I always use the hoods: ZF21/2.8, Sigma 50/1.4, ZF100MP, 200/2VR.



Jan 29, 2011 at 03:42 PM
jprezant
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #10 · ThinkTank Retrospective 30 review


deepbluejh wrote:
Also, any comments on stacking lenses inside the bag? It would seem like it might scratch up the barrels of the lenses.


So?



Feb 19, 2011 at 03:14 AM
1              end




FM Forums | General Gear-talk | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account