Upload & Sell: Off
I've a question, in particular for Jako. I read in many reviews of leica and vintage in general lenses, (for example see slrlensreview.com), that many lenses, especially the older ones, show less resolving power of sensors on a large megapixel camera.
In fact, when I moved from the first model 5d (12mpx) to the mark II (21mpx), I noticed in the Summicron 35 further deterioration of the edges and of overall image quality. While on recent lenses, like the 35-70 f4 (I regret selling it), and not only at the edges, seem to me much better performers. I have no doubt that the 80-200 ROM I have outresolves the 5D II. On the other hand, reading reviews about other older design lenses, in particular the 60 elmarit, would seem to contradict this.
So the terrible question is: does it makes more sense to invest in modern zeiss optics than older leica lenses on large megapixel sensors? Mine is not a swipe versus leica, obviously. I prefer the leica character too