wayne seltzer Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
p.2 #11 · Which wides for Canon for landscape? | |
Luvwine wrote:
Well, I want to thank those of you who have responded as I have bought some glass. Just to update, I sold my OM 24 shift, my Canon 24 TS-E (version I), my 70-200 2.8L IS and my 35L 1.4 and bought a Canon 17L TS-E (got one used in mint condition to try out for a while and if it is too wide, I will sell but so far I like it tho I have not had an opportunity to really test it out yet), a Zeiss ZE 21 2.8, and I have ordered the Zeiss ZE 35/2 and 50/2. I will try these out and see what I want to keep. I really like the Zeiss 21 so far. I am not certain about the Canon 17L yet as it has a learning curve but seems like it has potential. I may eventually want to swap it for a 24 TS-E-II but we will see. What I am having trouble deciding is whether to keep the 16-35L-II as the 17L TS-E is better as is the Zeiss 21, but then my bag is heavier....time will tell, I guess. The age old debate between quality and convenience or quality and flexibility of framing versus need for cropping never ends.
I really like my 17 TS-E and carry it along with my 14-24G and ZF 35/2 and ZE 50/2 MP.
Saw Boris's comparison shots of 17 vs. ZE 21 but wouldn't mind seeing some more.
My 16-35L mk1 never made it back into my bag after getting the 14-24G and 35/2. 
I have only kept if for those rare cases when I want AF wide angle.
From limited shooting of Mark's copy of the 24-TS-Emk2 it seemed like although the 24 maybe slightly sharper in the center than the 17, that the 17 did better in the corners when shifted. Would be nice if someone else could confirm this. The 17 with a 1.4 TC is good enough for me for those times when I need a 24 T/S. Still the new 24 TS-E is a sweet lens though.
|