Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              909      
910
       911              982       983       end
  

ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)
  
 
Ulff
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #1 · p.910 #1 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Budapest by night (Zeiss ZE 100 2.0):







Nov 20, 2013 at 03:48 PM
Frogfish
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #2 · p.910 #2 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Many beautiful, and in some cases world-class, work has been posted over the last few pages since I last looked at this thread. I gave 'Likes' to those that popped my eyes, but there are so many I had to leave some very good shots out. My work isn't anywhere near that level but I am looking, learning and continue to aspire to reach those peaks

A couple from NZ earlier this year. C&C always welcome so don't spare the lash !

D800 & Zeiss 21mm






Nov 20, 2013 at 06:43 PM
zhangyue
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.910 #3 · p.910 #3 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Ulff wrote:
Budapest by night (Zeiss ZE 100 2.0):
http://www.paintingwithlight.de/FilesEx/ze100_61.jpg

Super image!



Nov 20, 2013 at 06:51 PM
Samuli Vahonen
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #4 · p.910 #4 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Ulff, nice church-photo.



I have had APO-Sonnar T* 2/135 already some time, but I have been shooting almost exclusively nature with it. On my "summer holiday" few weeks ago I visited Malta, and shoot first time some "urban" scenes with 2/135. Bokeh is very nice, for a long time I enjoyed browsing photos on computer (I typically hate everything requiring to sit indoors in front of computer, smells like work...). Bokeh is not too smooth, but also it's never too rough either - on my books this is very close to perfect.

Carl Zeiss APO-Sonnar T* 2/135 @ f/2, 1/15s, ISO 100, polarizer


Carl Zeiss APO-Sonnar T* 2/135 @ f/2, 1/30s, ISO 100, polarizer


Carl Zeiss APO-Sonnar T* 2/135 @ f/2, 1/320s, ISO 100, polarizer


Samuli



Nov 20, 2013 at 09:02 PM
RiverGuy
Offline

Upload & Sell: On
p.910 #5 · p.910 #5 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Beautiful harbor images with the 135/2, Samuli.

Clarity....Like I could paddle over and touch those boats.

Edited on Nov 21, 2013 at 01:33 PM · View previous versions



Nov 21, 2013 at 12:27 AM
darbo
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.910 #6 · p.910 #6 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


RiverGuy wrote:
Beautiful harbor images with the 135/2, Samuli.


+1 They're excellent.



Nov 21, 2013 at 01:08 AM
Samuli Vahonen
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #7 · p.910 #7 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Just checked stats from Malta 2/135 shots - total 137 photos of which: f/2 53pcs, f/2.8 1pcs, f/4 19pcs, f/4.5 1pcs, f/5.6 99pcs, f/6.3 1pcs, f/8 65pcs, f/9 1pcs, f/10 16pcs, f/11 42pcs, f/13 14pcs, f/14 1pcs, f/16 3pcs, f/20 1pcs. Can't resist shooting wide open, specially urban subjects. For nature more often larger DOF is required for subject matter, hopefully not too many need deconvolution sharpening to restore dullness caused by small aperture.

Not sure if I dare to put these "ooh nice bokeh" shots to my webpage, artistically they have about zero value. But for gear forum these suit well, specially since there haven't been very many samples of 2/135. Sorted by "warmness" from coldest to warmest

Carl Zeiss APO-Sonnar T* 2/135 @ f/2, 1/800s, ISO 100, CZ T* polarizer


Carl Zeiss APO-Sonnar T* 2/135 @ f/2, 1/320s, ISO 100, CZ T* polarizer


Carl Zeiss APO-Sonnar T* 2/135 @ f/2, 1/320s, ISO 100, CZ T* polarizer


Carl Zeiss APO-Sonnar T* 2/135 @ f/2, 1/320s, ISO 100, CZ T* polarizer


Samuli



Nov 21, 2013 at 05:20 PM
Ronny _Olsson
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #8 · p.910 #8 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Awesome shot's Samuli
Great to see some vacation photos
Please link your website

Ronny//



Nov 21, 2013 at 05:28 PM
Samuli Vahonen
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #9 · p.910 #9 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Ronny _Olsson wrote:
Awesome shot's Samuli
Great to see some vacation photos
Please link your website

Ronny//

Thanks, http://www.vahonen.com - thou if you follow this thread and Zeiss thread, you have seen all my images, actually much more than what I post to website. Updating website is boring (like work), so I have been very lazy - Also I don't like writing but for a blog one has to write something. Don't all go there, I pay for the traffic if it goes over x GB/mth limit...

Samuli



Nov 21, 2013 at 05:39 PM
Rajan Parrikar
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.910 #10 · p.910 #10 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


More in my blog post.

5D Mark III + Zeiss ZE 15 f/2.8 Distagon -








Nov 21, 2013 at 05:46 PM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



RdEoSg
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #11 · p.910 #11 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Lots of amazing work here!

So I have a conundrum. I guess I should start with what I own. I have a Canon 5DmkIII with a 24 f1.4L fist version, a 50 f1.4, and a 100 f2. I've had the opportunity to shoot with the Zeiss 50 f1.4 ZE and really love it. I know it's not much sharper or showing less CA than the Canon really, but I just prefer the look over all.

So my question is this. I also own a Leica M6 with a pair of lenses. As much as I so love my Leica, it hasn't been used in probably 4-5 years and it's becoming such a hassle to process and scan, I'm thinking possibly of selling it to fund some lenses for the Canon that I actually use.

My first thought its the 50mm f2 Makro-Planar which looks to be the nicer of the two 50mm lenses.

My second thought is I have no idea! I love the look of the 21 and know it's considered one of the best, if not the best ultrawide of all. My hesitation is that I really don't shoot ultra wide very often. I had a 16-35 that I sold because I found that among other reasons, I didn't need the range and usually shot around 24mm, hence my 24mm f1.4 which I love.

The 35mm range is my favorite, so the 35 1.4 or 2 seem like good choices.

I also love portraits so the 85mm 1.4 was near the top of my list, but I find that I shoot usually wide open or with in a stop, and usually very near the minimum focus distance, so I'm not sure if that's a good choice or not from the comments and reviews I've read about the focus issues.

What doe you guys think?



Nov 22, 2013 at 12:26 AM
carstenw
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #12 · p.910 #12 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


I would start with the lens you have tried and love. The 50MP is very different, sharper, but with much less attractive boke and more neutral rendering. I have both and prefer the Planar. The price is also very attractive.

Once you have that, you might look at the 35s. I prefer the f/1.4, but it is huge and expensive, and quite hard to focus. The 35/2 is also very nice, but with less subtle rendering, but more obvious 3D.

The 85/1.4 is great, but has focus shift and is hard to focus as well. For people at close range this lens requires quite fine control.

The 100/2 also has beautiful rendering, and has 1:2 near-macro range ability. This might make a nice second or third lens, or perhaps the 135/2 if you can use the range and don't do macro.

The 21/2.8 is legendary, but if you don't shoot that wide, then perhaps it is pointless. The 25/2 is meant to be great, but I don't own it and cannot verify that. In any case, it sits in the same spot as your existing lens.

The 28/2 has a mixed reputation. It has field curvature, which can cause boke problems in the corners, but it has this very gentle, beautiful boke for certain subject/background ranges, and I love mine. It has been called an artist's lens, not implying that anyone who doesn't like it isn't an artist, of course, but giving some sense that it isn't great for purely technical matter, perhaps.



Nov 22, 2013 at 09:51 AM
bushwacker
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #13 · p.910 #13 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Samuli Vahonen wrote:
http://www.vahonen.com/2013/Q4/10-19%20Pulkalajarvi,Pirkkala/20131019_12-05-41_35mm_f4_1per13s_972.jpg

Samuli



Samuli,

What's your subject to camera distance here?



Nov 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM
Samuli Vahonen
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #14 · p.910 #14 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


bushwacker wrote:
Samuli,

What's your subject to camera distance here?

I don't remember the shooting situation accurate enough, but the tree diameter is 35cm/14inch +-few centimeters


carstenw wrote:
The 21/2.8 is legendary, but if you don't shoot that wide, then perhaps it is pointless. The 25/2 is meant to be great, but I don't own it and cannot verify that. In any case, it sits in the same spot as your existing lens.

25/2 is great with few flaws; field curvature on extreme corners and change of getting very rough bokeh. Lens is very well corrected, has best colors of ZE/ZF lenses I have shoot with (I don't own 15, 18 or Otus).

carstenw wrote:
The 28/2 has a mixed reputation. It has field curvature, which can cause boke problems in the corners, but it has this very gentle, beautiful boke for certain subject/background ranges, and I love mine. It has been called an artist's lens, not implying that anyone who doesn't like it isn't an artist, of course, but giving some sense that it isn't great for purely technical matter, perhaps.

+1 - I'm happy with the lens, and I have learned to work with corner bokeh issues (lens barrel too small and DOF is larger on corners, can be very problematic on someone like me who shoots 90% of time inside the forest - if you browse my posts from few past years you will find samples about this issue). Mostly I use this lens for wide angle shooting, partyly due to 50mm is my favorite focal length and mixing 35 and 50 is hard because they are so close that I would have hard time opening bag and changing to different camera body for such small FOV difference.

Samuli



Nov 22, 2013 at 12:24 PM
Ronny _Olsson
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #15 · p.910 #15 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


D700 + 100MP
Almost over sharpened .. blaming it on flickr







Nov 23, 2013 at 02:25 PM
Ronny _Olsson
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #16 · p.910 #16 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


D700+Zeiss 100MP



Nov 23, 2013 at 04:22 PM
JaKo
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #17 · p.910 #17 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Kodak Portra 160 emulation













Nov 23, 2013 at 08:42 PM
rodizzle33
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.910 #18 · p.910 #18 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


My attempt to do a HDR panoramic with the Zeiss 100MP with a D800 at the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles.


Griffith Park Pano HDR by rodknee_ty2003, on Flickr


Single shot with the Zeiss 100MP


Sunset at Griffith Observatory by rodknee_ty2003, on Flickr


This is a Wide Angle HDR with a Zeiss 21mm ZF.1


Sunset at Griffith Observatory HDR by rodknee_ty2003, on Flickr



Nov 24, 2013 at 12:17 AM
Taylor Sherman
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #19 · p.910 #19 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


I think the 21mm shot is the winner there, and the single-shot 100mm I like too.


Nov 24, 2013 at 01:56 AM
Taylor Sherman
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.910 #20 · p.910 #20 · ZE/ZF/ZM Images (Official Thread!)


Ronny _Olsson wrote:
D700 + 100MP
Almost over sharpened .. blaming it on flickr


My favorite "jumping dog" shot of yours so far!




Nov 24, 2013 at 01:57 AM
1       2       3              909      
910
       911              982       983       end




FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              909      
910
       911              982       983       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Reset password