BrianO Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
rogie wrote: ...the way i understood is that ff is able to achieve shallower dof because it can shoot closer with the same framing as a crop cam given the same lenses. is this right or not?
That is correct.
If the camera-to-subject distance is the same, the cropped-sensor camera will have less DoF with the same lens and aperture, but if you decrease the distance the DoF also decreases; and since you can get closer with the FF camera for the same FoV, you'll have shallower DoF than with the cropped-sensor camera, which must be further back for that FoV.
For example, using the same 200mm lens as in my previous example, to fill the frame of a 5D Mark II from top to bottom (in landscape orientation) with a six-foot tall man we would have to be 50 feet away. Assuming an aperture of f/8, for example, that would give a DoF of 9.1 feet.
To fill the frame of a 50D with that six-foot tall man, we would have to be 80 feet away, which at f/8 would give a DoF of 14.8 feet.
So in this example the FF camera has just a bit more than half the DoF of the APS-C camera for the same FoV.
|